|
06-24-2013, 06:27 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 12,770
|
|
Bow trout fishery threatened
__________________
Dinos
681
Shove your masks and your vaccines
Non Compliance!!!!!!
"According to Trudeau, Im an extremist who needs to be dealt with"
#Trudeau must go
Wheres The Funds
The vaccine was not brought in for COVID. COVID was brought in for the vaccine. Once you realize that, everything else makes sense.” ~ Dr. Reiner Fuellmich
|
06-24-2013, 06:41 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,928
|
|
Too soon to tell, but the potential is there for sure. Big changes coming to the Bow once the water drops.
__________________
Respond, not react. - Saskatchewan proverb
We learn from history that we do not learn from history. - Hegel
Your obligation to fight has not been relieved because the battle is fierce and difficult. Ben Shapiro
|
06-24-2013, 06:44 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: on a mishn for fishn.
Posts: 8,790
|
|
Pesky scientist types like they know.Alberta trout dont need their book readns.(jk)
I hope everyone actually pays attention when the environment shows us we need to rethink some things. I hope the bow as we know it is not lost to 3-5 mtr walled flood canal. Sigh. Im am however afraid my first statement will ring true.
|
06-24-2013, 07:14 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: down by the river
Posts: 11,428
|
|
In crisis there is opportunity.
|
06-24-2013, 07:27 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 32
|
|
Does anyone else find it funny that a guy from the flat land, University of Saskatchewan is talking about the Rockies. He's clearly clueless when it come to the resiliency of fish, floods like this happen and fish come back on their own, otherwise we'd have no fish. Evolution works, despite what they may teach in Saskatchewan.
Nothing against Saskatchewan, it's just that... maybe they should have picked someone from Alberta or BC to talk about trout in the mountains.
|
06-24-2013, 07:55 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,230
|
|
10% truth and 90% dramatic false dogma.
|
06-24-2013, 07:57 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: on a mishn for fishn.
Posts: 8,790
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by walking buffalo
10% truth and 90% dramatic false dogma.
|
Please point out a few of the falshoods in the article.
|
06-24-2013, 08:19 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: down by the river
Posts: 11,428
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by walking buffalo
10% truth and 90% dramatic false dogma.
|
Yup
Dogma doesn't necessarily mean a falsehood FG.
|
06-24-2013, 07:55 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: on a mishn for fishn.
Posts: 8,790
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fedfred
Does anyone else find it funny that a guy from the flat land, University of Saskatchewan is talking about the Rockies. He's clearly clueless when it come to the resiliency of fish, floods like this happen and fish come back on their own, otherwise we'd have no fish. Evolution works, despite what they may teach in Saskatchewan.
Nothing against Saskatchewan, it's just that... maybe they should have picked someone from Alberta or BC to talk about trout in the mountains.
|
Im not 100% but we could call this the never seen before flood, so how do we know what affect it will have on fish habitat . Im just going to suggest everyones on the same page on this....a blank one.
|
06-24-2013, 08:30 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,706
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fedfred
Does anyone else find it funny that a guy from the flat land, University of Saskatchewan is talking about the Rockies. He's clearly clueless when it come to the resiliency of fish, floods like this happen and fish come back on their own, otherwise we'd have no fish. Evolution works, despite what they may teach in Saskatchewan.
Nothing against Saskatchewan, it's just that... maybe they should have picked someone from Alberta or BC to talk about trout in the mountains.
|
What difference does it actually make what university the person doing the study attends or teaches at? How do you know where they're from or what their qualifications are? I don't know many professors that were alive during the heyday of Ancient Greece, does that mean their knowledge and research is invalid?
Questioning the conclusions is one thing, but basing it on the fact that it comes from the U of S is just ridiculous.
|
06-24-2013, 08:44 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: CANADA
Posts: 6,269
|
|
here is his qualifications and its early yet.. but I think he has raised concerns for all the eastern slopes in the future
ps I would take his summation as best science
Food for Thought
David
http://www.usask.ca/hydrology/people/Pomeroy_John.php
|
06-24-2013, 08:48 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,939
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fedfred
Nothing against Saskatchewan, it's just that... maybe they should have picked someone from Alberta or BC to talk about trout in the mountains.
|
I guess Canmore is too flat land for you... as it says in the article "who spoke from the Alberta mountain community of Canmore, where he works at a field research station"
|
06-24-2013, 08:48 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 317
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fedfred
Does anyone else find it funny that a guy from the flat land, University of Saskatchewan is talking about the Rockies. He's clearly clueless when it come to the resiliency of fish, floods like this happen and fish come back on their own, otherwise we'd have no fish. Evolution works, despite what they may teach in Saskatchewan.
Nothing against Saskatchewan, it's just that... maybe they should have picked someone from Alberta or BC to talk about trout in the mountains.
|
Are you serious?? I know he has a huge part in watershed program in Canmore and has done endless studies on rivers( Sask and Alberta)
I find it more funny that you choose to attack his knowledge bc he is professor in Sask... Just made yourself lok more ignorant than anything
|
06-24-2013, 08:56 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: down by the river
Posts: 11,428
|
|
Yep
|
06-24-2013, 10:15 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 32
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by THERICARDO
Are you serious?? I know he has a huge part in watershed program in Canmore and has done endless studies on rivers( Sask and Alberta)
I find it more funny that you choose to attack his knowledge bc he is professor in Sask... Just made yourself lok more ignorant than anything
|
I'd trust an ecologist from a local university, both UofA and UofC have ecological studies on fisheries in Alberta. BC has done more research on fisheries than anyone else. The fact that he did studies outside his province shows he couldn't get the data from his region. At least he's trying.
Yes, I'm ignorant, but so is everyone else. If you want to be taken seriously, you should at least live/teach near the place you're researching.
|
06-26-2013, 07:34 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 47
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fedfred
Does anyone else find it funny that a guy from the flat land, University of Saskatchewan is talking about the Rockies. He's clearly clueless when it come to the resiliency of fish, floods like this happen and fish come back on their own, otherwise we'd have no fish. Evolution works, despite what they may teach in Saskatchewan.
Nothing against Saskatchewan, it's just that... maybe they should have picked someone from Alberta or BC to talk about trout in the mountains.
|
Just like the buffalo!!!
|
06-26-2013, 09:45 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,112
|
|
On a happy note, there were some adult mayflys around last night while I was walking the dog. Things look to be draining quite well, i am not sure how much rescuing will be needed.
Looks like there is a new channel by the Mallard Point foot bridge, and maybe those are the spots to focus efforts as they dry up. Any shallow flood pond will get past 75F pretty quick once it stops flowing killing what is there.
|
06-24-2013, 07:36 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,316
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeeGuy
In crisis there is opportunity.
|
Is this comment sposed to mean something?
Can you elaborate a little?
The one good thing about the Bow is that there are many tributaries for the fish to seek shelter.
It's the waterways that dont have shelter that will see more mortalities.
|
06-24-2013, 07:41 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: down by the river
Posts: 11,428
|
|
Which tributaries were you thinking about?
My statement was in reference to the article. Did you read it?
|
06-24-2013, 08:01 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: on a mishn for fishn.
Posts: 8,790
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MtnGiant
Is this comment sposed to mean something?
Can you elaborate a little?
The one good thing about the Bow is that there are many tributaries for the fish to seek shelter.
It's the waterways that dont have shelter that will see more mortalities.
|
Please point out which tributary south of the clearwater river in the south saskatchewan river dranage basin these trout were finding refuge in And just for the smart alec yes I know the clearwater drains into the north sask .lol
|
06-24-2013, 09:06 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,316
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fish gunner
Please point out which tributary south of the clearwater river in the south saskatchewan river dranage basin these trout were finding refuge in And just for the smart alec yes I know the clearwater drains into the north sask .lol
|
settle down GuppyGunner
I can only point out the areas I know of here in Calgary.
Must you troll on......maybe you should ask the mods to change your name to TrollGunner.
Smarten up sucka!!!!!
OMG!!!!!....the insulence of people that breath the same air as me
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:10 PM.
|