Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-01-2024, 07:16 AM
Moe Moe is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 249
Default Trans Mountain Pipeline

That's the thing about politics; 50% hate you and 50% love you. But for Alberta, this was one thing Trudeau did that will help a lot of people in the oil patch.
https://vancouversun.com/business/tr...n-oil-pipeline
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-01-2024, 07:54 AM
Walleyedude Walleyedude is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,709
Default

That reads as though you're giving Trudeau credit for Trans Mountain getting built. Is that how you meant it?

Because that's like thanking someone for not breaking your legs after they've already broken your arms and stolen your wallet...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-01-2024, 07:55 AM
Talking moose's Avatar
Talking moose Talking moose is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: McBride/Prince George
Posts: 14,613
Default

Trudeau for Prime Minister!!!!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-01-2024, 08:01 AM
BuckCuller's Avatar
BuckCuller BuckCuller is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,680
Default I will give no credit to the Liberals.

Or he could have just let it get built in the first place so it didn’t take so long and be so far over budget and maybe not waist a bunch of tax payer money.
They turned it into a financial disaster just like everything else they have touched!
__________________
As long as there is lead in the air there is always hope.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-01-2024, 08:02 AM
Twisted Canuck's Avatar
Twisted Canuck Twisted Canuck is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: GP AB
Posts: 16,289
Default

One thing Trudeau did?? What, stopped private capital from being able to build an enormously beneficial project with endless regulatory hoops and legislation and focused animosity on the energy sector, then after someone explained the repercussions, he does an about face and spends 5x the amount of public money to complete it? Yes, so grateful we should be.
__________________
'Once the monkeys learn they can vote themselves a banana, they'll never climb another tree.'. Robert Heinlein

'You can accomplish a lot more with a kind word and a gun, than with a kind word alone.' Al Capone
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-01-2024, 08:08 AM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Twisted Canuck View Post
One thing Trudeau did?? What, stopped private capital from being able to build an enormously beneficial project with endless regulatory hoops and legislation and focused animosity on the energy sector, then after someone explained the repercussions, he does an about face and spends 5x the amount of public money to complete it? Yes, so grateful we should be.
Exactly, he didn't do the oilpatch or the Canadian
taxpayers any service, he just delayed the project, and made us pay for it, instead of having the project completed by the companies that started the project. Only a true woke/socialist person would see Trudeau's interference in this, as a good thing.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-01-2024, 08:31 AM
Grizzly Adams1 Grizzly Adams1 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 3,875
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BuckCuller View Post
Or he could have just let it get built in the first place so it didn’t take so long and be so far over budget and maybe not waist a bunch of tax payer money.
They turned it into a financial disaster just like everything else they have touched!
There it is, the primary reasons for the massive cost over runs.
__________________
Woe unto them that join house to house, that lay field to field, till there is no place, that they be alone in the midst of the Earth.

Isaiah 5:8
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-01-2024, 08:48 AM
Drewski Canuck Drewski Canuck is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,985
Default

While the Liberals slap themselves on the back and sip back champagne for increasing the west coast access for oil export, does ANYONE here remember what he did on getting elected to the permitted, routed, and procured Northern Gateway Pipeline?

Apparently NOT. Northern Gateway would have taken oil from a number of
Alberta producers to the West Coast. One plan was Kitimat, but on the argument of tanker traffic and oil spill risk, it was cancelled by Trudeau. Another terminal could have been Prince Rupert.

That project was set to start construction in 2016, but was cancelled after the election of the Liberals. Trudeau claimed he had kayaked in the great northern rain forest so he declared himself an "expert".

Instead, we increased tanker traffic to Kitimat with an LNG terminal, and apparently an LNG tanker can do no harm if it hits a reef or runs aground.

So don't ask what Ottawa has done for you. Ask what Ottawa has done TO you.

Drewski
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-01-2024, 09:12 AM
W921 W921 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,476
Default

Plus its kind of to late. Would be a real Lazarus miracle to bring back what we once had. Its good that someday it will get built. But oil and gas sector so devastated I don't think it will ever be what it was.
To many bankrupted. To many outfits left the country and are busy in other spots in the world. Why come back and risk same nonsense?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-01-2024, 11:22 AM
huntinstuff's Avatar
huntinstuff huntinstuff is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 9,642
Default

If anyone in the real world did this, they would never be allowed near money again.

But government gets a pass.....got it
__________________
When you are born, you get a ticket to the Freak Show.
If you are born in Canada, you get a front row seat.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-01-2024, 12:04 PM
jstubbs jstubbs is offline
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Parkland County
Posts: 2,391
Default

Sigh. Why does the pipeline need to be sold? Why not keep it under crown corp so our future generations can enjoy prosperity? Instead, we’re going to sell it to the private sector corp at a likely $10-15,000,000,000 write down. Some estimated say after interest+debt repayments it’ll likely churn a profit for years to come.

Of course, Canadian taxpayers don’t deserve to reap the benefits of publicly paid for infrastructure, only shareholders (or worse, foreign private equity). I mean christ, it’s a pipeline, even if the operates it rather inefficiently, as long as the line maintains solid uptime it’s all negligible given the revenue it can produce.
__________________
And unlike the clock on the wall at your momma house, I do not have time to hang.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-01-2024, 12:16 PM
Sleddawg Sleddawg is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Alberta
Posts: 263
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jstubbs View Post
Sigh. Why does the pipeline need to be sold? Why not keep it under crown corp so our future generations can enjoy prosperity? Instead, we’re going to sell it to the private sector corp at a likely $10-15,000,000,000 write down. Some estimated say after interest+debt repayments it’ll likely churn a profit for years to come.

Of course, Canadian taxpayers don’t deserve to reap the benefits of publicly paid for infrastructure, only shareholders (or worse, foreign private equity). I mean christ, it’s a pipeline, even if the operates it rather inefficiently, as long as the line maintains solid uptime it’s all negligible given the revenue it can produce.
What now? You don't actually think that something owned by the government would benefit we the people in reality do you? No, it would be a place for them to make money to pad their pensions and ship overseas to please everyone but their own people.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-01-2024, 12:28 PM
jstubbs jstubbs is offline
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Parkland County
Posts: 2,391
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sleddawg View Post
What now? You don't actually think that something owned by the government would benefit we the people in reality do you? No, it would be a place for them to make money to pad their pensions and ship overseas to please everyone but their own people.
Nothing you wrote gives any reason to negate keeping it nationalized. Government spending is it’s own issue; I’m talking about revenue here.
__________________
And unlike the clock on the wall at your momma house, I do not have time to hang.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-01-2024, 12:29 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jstubbs View Post
Sigh. Why does the pipeline need to be sold? Why not keep it under crown corp so our future generations can enjoy prosperity? Instead, we’re going to sell it to the private sector corp at a likely $10-15,000,000,000 write down. Some estimated say after interest+debt repayments it’ll likely churn a profit for years to come.

Of course, Canadian taxpayers don’t deserve to reap the benefits of publicly paid for infrastructure, only
shareholders (or worse, foreign private equity). I mean christ, it’s a pipeline, even if the operates it rather inefficiently, as long as the line maintains solid uptime
it’s all negligible given the revenue it can produce.
Do you honestly think that the liberal government could possibly run a pipeline to make a profit for the taxpayers? More like they would hire their buddies to run the pipeline and maintain it, and the pipeline would run at a loss, while their buddies made a profit, and kicked back some cash to Trudeau in appreciation.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-01-2024, 12:54 PM
jstubbs jstubbs is offline
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Parkland County
Posts: 2,391
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
Do you honestly think that the liberal government could possibly run a pipeline to make a profit for the taxpayers? More like they would hire their buddies to run the pipeline and maintain it, and the pipeline would run at a loss, while their buddies made a profit, and kicked back some cash to Trudeau in appreciation.
They’re estimating yearly the pipeline will be incurring $3 billion in revenue and operating costs of $600m. That’s before $1.6 billion per year in interest costs, which shrink as debt is reduced. So at current projections, there’s $800m worth of cash flow available for debt repayment and/or remittance to the public purse right out of the gate that should only grow.

That’s estimates on crown corp operations, too. Now, analysts have been substantially wrong before (such as on the construction of the pipeline), but you’ll note that publicly traded well experienced midstream corp TC Energy also experienced major cost overruns ($6 billion to over $15 billion) on CGL, but moreover operation & maintenance on a pipeline is substantially more simple than construction of pipeline through the Rockies so overruns should not be nearly as prevalent.

Even if they manage to completely bungle operating costs and double them from $600m to $1.2b, there’s still $200+m worth of free cash flow off this project. It’s still a net benefit.

The dislike for the current Prime Minister shouldn’t overshadow what is good decision making. Not everything has to be about “owning the libs”.
__________________
And unlike the clock on the wall at your momma house, I do not have time to hang.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-01-2024, 01:02 PM
32-40win 32-40win is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Near Drumheller
Posts: 6,784
Default

And then, you get things like this that make you wonder, Russian LNG project, and who's funding that, along with who is evading sanctions to sell product to it. https://www.reuters.com/business/ene...ay-2024-04-04/
__________________
You should also be a member;
CCFR
CSSA
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-01-2024, 01:08 PM
Bigwoodsman Bigwoodsman is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 8,377
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jstubbs View Post
They’re estimating yearly the pipeline will be incurring $3 billion in revenue and operating costs of $600m. That’s before $1.6 billion per year in interest costs, which shrink as debt is reduced. So at current projections, there’s $800m worth of cash flow available for debt repayment and/or remittance to the public purse right out of the gate that should only grow.

That’s estimates on crown corp operations, too. Now, analysts have been substantially wrong before (such as on the construction of the pipeline), but you’ll note that publicly traded well experienced midstream corp TC Energy also experienced major cost overruns ($6 billion to over $15 billion) on CGL, but moreover operation & maintenance on a pipeline is substantially more simple than construction of pipeline through the Rockies so overruns should not be nearly as prevalent.

Even if they manage to completely bungle operating costs and double them from $600m to $1.2b, there’s still $200+m worth of free cash flow off this project. It’s still a net benefit.

The dislike for the current Prime Minister shouldn’t overshadow what is good decision making. Not everything has to be about “owning the libs”.
Our lieberal leader does not think in monetary terms, or fiscal responsibility. There is no way they would operate this as a money making venture.

BW
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-01-2024, 01:12 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jstubbs View Post
They’re estimating yearly the pipeline will be incurring $3 billion in revenue and operating costs of $600m. That’s before $1.6 billion per year in interest costs, which shrink as debt is reduced. So at current projections, there’s $800m worth of cash flow available for debt repayment and/or remittance to the public purse right out of the gate that should only grow.

That’s estimates on crown corp operations, too. Now,
analysts have been substantially wrong before (such as on the construction of the pipeline), but you’ll note that publicly traded well experienced midstream corp TC
Energy also experienced major cost overruns ($6 billion to over $15 billion) on CGL, but moreover operation & maintenance on a pipeline is substantially more simple than construction of pipeline through the Rockies so
overruns should not be nearly as prevalent.

Even if they manage to completely bungle operating costs and double them from $600m to $1.2b, there’s still
$200+m worth of free cash flow off this project. It’s still a net benefit.
The dislike for the current Prime Minister shouldn’t overshadow what is good decision making. Not everything has to be about “owning the libs”.

Looking at the billions in extra construction costs under the federal government, it is only logical to assume that operating/maintenance costs will also greatly exceed
estimates. As long as the liberals are in power, they
have control over the pipeline, so it's perfectly logical to
expect incompetence and corruption , like SNC, and
WE. So the odds are, the incompetence and corruption will result in the pipeline operating at a loss ,rather than at a profit, if it remains under government control.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-01-2024, 01:24 PM
59whiskers 59whiskers is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: South West Alberta
Posts: 813
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
Exactly, he didn't do the oilpatch or the Canadian
taxpayers any service, he just delayed the project, and made us pay for it, instead of having the project completed by the companies that started the project. Only a true woke/socialist person would see Trudeau's interference in this, as a good thing.
Some Friend of the Liberal/NDP parties will be given a pipeline cheap?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-01-2024, 03:48 PM
sewerrat's Avatar
sewerrat sewerrat is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 2,634
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Talking moose View Post
Trudeau for Prime Minister!!!!!!!!!!
Yup he build the pipeline, now he can Flick off!
Stupid wacko!
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 05-01-2024, 04:01 PM
igorot's Avatar
igorot igorot is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: calgary
Posts: 860
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moe View Post
That's the thing about politics; 50% hate you and 50% love you. But for Alberta, this was one thing Trudeau did that will help a lot of people in the oil patch.
https://vancouversun.com/business/tr...n-oil-pipeline
They saw a milking cow for their cronies to help them finance their next election campaign. The pipeline was already being built until they created so much bureaucratic red tape that it was no longer feasible for the private sector.
__________________
“It is not the man who has too little, but the man who craves more, who is poor.”
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-01-2024, 04:54 PM
58thecat's Avatar
58thecat 58thecat is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: At the end of the Thirsty Beaver Trail, Pinsky lake, Alberta.
Posts: 24,710
Default

Yahooooo!!!!!




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________

Be careful when you follow the masses, sometimes the "M" is silent...
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-01-2024, 04:58 PM
Scott h Scott h is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: At the lake
Posts: 2,522
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 59whiskers View Post
Some Friend of the Liberal/NDP parties will be given a pipeline cheap?
Seems like the perfect project for Danielle to sell her idea for an APP investment? Alberta pension money invested directly into a project with direct financial ties for Albertans.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-01-2024, 05:01 PM
-JR- -JR- is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Edm.
Posts: 4,993
Default

Should be some good hunting on those green pipe lines this year .
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-01-2024, 05:34 PM
Au revoir, Gopher's Avatar
Au revoir, Gopher Au revoir, Gopher is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Westerose
Posts: 4,103
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott h View Post
Seems like the perfect project for Danielle to sell her idea for an APP investment? Alberta pension money invested directly into a project with direct financial ties for Albertans.
Did you happen to read the article from the OP?
Alberta’s provincial pension fund has publicly expressed interest.

“We have an active file on Trans Mountain,” Evan Siddall, the Alberta Investment Management Corp. chief executive officer, told Bloomberg. “We would look at it, the government knows that, and we’re keeping track of that situation.”
I know that's not the same as the APP, but...

ARG
__________________
In the immortal words of Jean Paul Sartre, 'Au revoir, gopher'.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sjemac View Post
It has been scientifically proven that a 308 round will not leave your property -- they essentially fall dead at the fence line. But a 38 round, when fired from a handgun, will of its own accord leave your property and destroy any small schools nearby.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-01-2024, 05:36 PM
Grizzly Adams1 Grizzly Adams1 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 3,875
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by huntinstuff View Post
If anyone in the real world did this, they would never be allowed near money again.

But government gets a pass.....got it
News report claims there will be a 15 Billion dollar write down when it sells.
__________________
Woe unto them that join house to house, that lay field to field, till there is no place, that they be alone in the midst of the Earth.

Isaiah 5:8
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-01-2024, 05:42 PM
I’d rather be outdoors I’d rather be outdoors is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 955
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grizzly Adams1 View Post
News report claims there will be a 15 Billion dollar write down when it sells.
I’m shocked people are still surprised at these things, lieberal motivations are clear as day, they don’t even try to hide them anymore.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-01-2024, 05:45 PM
1hogfarmer 1hogfarmer is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: North Peace
Posts: 248
Default

When you have people local to the LML getting paid crazy LOA and sleeping at home every night, that doesn’t help.

Over runs like site c…..
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 05-01-2024, 06:51 PM
Moe Moe is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 249
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Walleyedude View Post
That reads as though you're giving Trudeau credit for Trans Mountain getting built. Is that how you meant it?

Because that's like thanking someone for not breaking your legs after they've already broken your arms and stolen your wallet...
Hey! Give credit where it is due. Even a blind squirrel finds a nut now and then
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 05-01-2024, 07:14 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moe View Post
Hey! Give credit where it is due. Even a blind squirrel finds a nut now and then
More like the blind squirrel bought a nut, with our money.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.