Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-12-2018, 09:11 AM
galspal galspal is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 71
Default Kimber or Christensen Arms

Hey Guys,

I am looking at getting a new lightweight rifle, so far the 2 I am thinking of are a Kimber Mountain Ascent or a Christensen Arms Ridgeline.

Do any of you have any suggestions? or maybe theres another rifle I should be looking at as well.


thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-12-2018, 10:13 AM
Nyksta Nyksta is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,542
Default

Looks like controlled round feed and blind internal magazine vs push feed with hinged floorplate. Also stock design fit. Some of these things come down to personal style and others advice might not match your style.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-12-2018, 11:15 AM
Kurt505 Kurt505 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Communist state
Posts: 13,245
Default

I haven’t owned the ascent but I’ve owned a Montana, great rifle.

First off, if you’re looking for an ultralight, the Ridgeline isn’t it. You can rule that one out. An alternative I would suggest is a Barrett Fieldcraft, and from what I’ve heard it’s an accurate rifle.

The Ridgeline is an awesome rifle, I have one right now and I’m considering another. It’s not heavy but it’s also not what I’d consider an ultralight. What it is, is an accurate rifle that’s a joy to shoot on the bench and easy enough to pack all day long on a hunt. Customer service is excellent as well.

Hunting wise, I’m not sure if you require an ultralight, if so then like I said the Ridgeline is out but definitely for Hunting anywhere outside of the tallest mountain peaks I think that either will do. On the bench there is no comparison, the Ridgeline all day long. With the carbon wrapped barrel you won’t get the barrel whip like you’ll get from the ascent, the Ridgeline will also cool way faster.

Not knocking Kimber because I think they make a fine rifle, but if it were me I’d get a Ridgeline. Ymmv.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-12-2018, 02:52 PM
Kurt505 Kurt505 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Communist state
Posts: 13,245
Default

Here is the CA Ridgeline with a scope.

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-12-2018, 03:00 PM
rmk_900 rmk_900 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 22
Default

Fierce CT Edge. Under 6lbs
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-12-2018, 06:46 PM
Norwest Alta Norwest Alta is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3,666
Default

Don't know about the kimber but the ca comes with sub-moa or 1/2 moa guarantee. I was looking at the mesa but the don't make it in 26 nos. Ended up with a hells canyon speed in instead
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-13-2018, 12:27 AM
West O'5 West O'5 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: W5
Posts: 1,093
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rmk_900 View Post
Fierce CT Edge. Under 6lbs
Advertised as 5.8lbs naked.....add rings (4oz)and and a relatively liteweight scope (<20oz)...sling and mag full of .300WSM,mine comes in right around 7.5lbs......a few ounces less then Kurt’s Ridgeline above.^^
I could probably shave 6oz or more with different scope and rings if that was a priority for me or if I wanted to punish myself further with a 7lbs all-in magnum(I hate muzzle brakes while hunting)......but I’m not climbing any mountains any time soon.When 6-8oz becomes a deal breaker/back breaker for me I’ll retire from hunting and learn how to knit mittens.
__________________
The toughest thing about waiting for the zombie apocalypse is pretending that I'm not excited.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-12-2018, 06:49 PM
LMS LMS is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Calgary
Posts: 62
Default

Look at the Fierce or Weatherby Ultralight I have both and both are good rifles.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-13-2018, 09:37 PM
outdoorsman12b outdoorsman12b is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 134
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by galspal View Post
Hey Guys,

I am looking at getting a new lightweight rifle, so far the 2 I am thinking of are a Kimber Mountain Ascent or a Christensen Arms Ridgeline.

Do any of you have any suggestions? or maybe theres another rifle I should be looking at as well.


thanks!
Way to many options out there. From the two you listed the ridge line blows the ascent out of the water.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-13-2018, 10:51 PM
Mastodon Mastodon is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 74
Default

I have a LH mesa on route. Will report back when it arrives.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-14-2018, 08:36 AM
7mmremmag 7mmremmag is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Lloydminster
Posts: 1,539
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mastodon View Post
I have a LH mesa on route. Will report back when it arrives.
Me too.
Which chambering did you go with?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-14-2018, 08:39 AM
Robmcleod82's Avatar
Robmcleod82 Robmcleod82 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,798
Default

Barrett Fieldcraft
__________________
"I don't know about the "shooting Savages" part. I have one and I have had considerable difficulty doing well with it. Part of the reason for this is that I feel a need to put bag over my head to hide my identity when ever I am shooting it!"
Leeper
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-14-2018, 01:33 PM
campingnut campingnut is offline
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 91
Default

id stay away from the kimber mountain ascent, I had 1 in 300wsm and even after getting it back from korth it still didn't feed shells worth Sh!T I used it as a single shot
maybe I just got a bad one but it turned me off them forever
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-22-2019, 10:29 PM
510-Gem 510-Gem is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 302
Default Kimber or Christensen Arms

Get a Christensen MPR! Folding stock busts it down to 34”” inches or less, depending on the barrel. Fully adjustable LOP and comb...and they look badass!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-23-2019, 08:17 AM
marky_mark marky_mark is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,701
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 510-Gem View Post
Get a Christensen MPR! Folding stock busts it down to 34”” inches or less, depending on the barrel. Fully adjustable LOP and comb...and they look badass!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Those rifles are surprisingly light
I actually like them
Let me know how it shoots
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-24-2019, 09:31 AM
510-Gem 510-Gem is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by marky_mark View Post




Those rifles are surprisingly light

I actually like them

Let me know how it shoots


I picked one up in 6.5 PRC just before Christmas. It has a 24” barrel and the bare rifle is just over 8lb. I sold a few of my sporter rifles for it. Just waiting for the scope. By no means a true lightweight rig but that folding stock is worth it IMO. There’s nothing more annoying than having a barrel sticking up above my pack and getting caught on branches.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.