Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-02-2022, 09:28 AM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,139
Default Electric Grid Alert

So another electric grid alert and we are being advised to conserve electricity. So lets add another million electric vehicles or so, and watch what happens.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-02-2022, 09:40 AM
Fish along's Avatar
Fish along Fish along is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Camrose county
Posts: 3,492
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
So another electric grid alert and we are being advised to conserve electricity. So lets add another million electric vehicles or so, and watch what happens.
Our grid wont be able to handle it.at some point E vehicles will be a serious threat to our power supplies.and the greenest place will be the graveyards.
__________________
If people concentrated on the really important things in life,there would be a shortage of fishing poles.Doug larson. Theres a fine line between fishing and just standing on the shore like an idiot. Steven Wright.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-02-2022, 09:50 AM
Dick284's Avatar
Dick284 Dick284 is online now
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dreadful Valley
Posts: 14,620
Default

Let’s put up more wind generation, because we all know how windy Alberta gets when it’s really cold or hot after all….

It’ll save the world you know…..
__________________


There are no absolutes
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-02-2022, 10:05 AM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,139
Default

Switzerland is severely restricting electric vehicles this winter, because of power supply concerns.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...shortages.html
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-02-2022, 10:36 AM
Dick284's Avatar
Dick284 Dick284 is online now
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dreadful Valley
Posts: 14,620
Default

If you aren’t in favour of carbon based generation (fossil fuels/coal) then you better accept the nuclear generation option. Relying on the so called “green” generation options is a road to ruin in the less than temperate climate zones.
__________________


There are no absolutes
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-02-2022, 10:44 AM
ruffy71 ruffy71 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 388
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick284 View Post
If you aren’t in favour of carbon based generation (fossil fuels/coal) then you better accept the nuclear generation option. Relying on the so called “green” generation options is a road to ruin in the less than temperate climate zones.
Absolutely. We will not ever be "off of oil", but it will eventually disappear. Nuclear is a good option, especially if you live in an area that doesn't experience richter 7 earthquakes, tsunamis and tidal waves.

Alberta should use oil revenues to help start the transition sooner rather than later.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-02-2022, 11:10 AM
Albertajeff Albertajeff is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Alberta
Posts: 142
Default

Alberta’s live Current Electrical Supply/Demand Report.


http://ets.aeso.ca/ets_web/ip/Market...DReportServlet
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-02-2022, 11:11 AM
gunluvr's Avatar
gunluvr gunluvr is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,600
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick284 View Post
If you aren’t in favour of carbon based generation (fossil fuels/coal) then you better accept the nuclear generation option. Relying on the so called “green” generation options is a road to ruin in the less than temperate climate zones.
Without abundant hydroelectric generation this is absolutely the only currently sensible option. Everything else is a waste of money that will eventually be decommissioned.
__________________
Some days you're a bullet; some days you're a gopher.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-02-2022, 11:12 AM
The Cook The Cook is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Canmore
Posts: 2,104
Default

Minus 28 here last night. One vehicle plugged in all night because you just can't count on an ambulance like you used to. Maybe shut off some lights in the downtown office towers for a start.
__________________
Woke up with a pulse, best day ever
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-02-2022, 11:17 AM
Dick284's Avatar
Dick284 Dick284 is online now
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dreadful Valley
Posts: 14,620
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gunluvr View Post
Without abundant hydroelectric generation this is absolutely the only currently sensible option. Everything else is a waste of money that will eventually be decommissioned.
Hydroelectric is pretty much dead as a door knob in Alberta right now, currently proposed or on the drawing board projects are a long way off, and of negligible capacity to begin with. Coupled with limited water flows, flow mandates, and even a bigger NIMBY out cry, maybe 200 mega watts capacity could be added to the grid in maybe 10 years……

At a construction cost of around $1 billion per mega watt capacity……..
__________________


There are no absolutes
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-02-2022, 11:48 AM
Grizzly Adams1 Grizzly Adams1 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 3,793
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ruffy71 View Post
Absolutely. We will not ever be "off of oil", but it will eventually disappear. Nuclear is a good option, especially if you live in an area that doesn't experience richter 7 earthquakes, tsunamis and tidal waves.

Alberta should use oil revenues to help start the transition sooner rather than later.
Doesn't matter what you do, there will be opposition. In the end, nuclear is the only real option, like it or not. Those modular reactors they're proposing now, apparently create comparatively 8 to 32x the waste produced by a full scale plant and we still haven't been politically able to deal with that. Ontario wants to dump some of theirs in a shallow burial site adjacent to Lake Huron. Guess how that's going over ?

Grizz
__________________
Woe unto them that join house to house, that lay field to field, till there is no place, that they be alone in the midst of the Earth.

Isaiah 5:8
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-02-2022, 12:26 PM
ctd ctd is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,380
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grizzly Adams1 View Post
Doesn't matter what you do, there will be opposition. In the end, nuclear is the only real option, like it or not. Those modular reactors they're proposing now, apparently create comparatively 8 to 32x the waste produced by a full scale plant and we still haven't been politically able to deal with that. Ontario wants to dump some of theirs in a shallow burial site adjacent to Lake Huron. Guess how that's going over ?

Grizz
Ontario are adding to their Nuke plants. Funny how that works out east. Heaven forbid Alberta build a pipeline and ship some natural gas to Europe.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-02-2022, 12:28 PM
ctd ctd is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,380
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fish along View Post
Our grid wont be able to handle it.at some point E vehicles will be a serious threat to our power supplies.and the greenest place will be the graveyards.
I was told you can plug in your electric vehicle to add power to the grid when it needs it. I laughed, you laughed we all laughed except those who do not understand where the initial electricity came from
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-02-2022, 12:30 PM
KGB's Avatar
KGB KGB is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,627
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
Switzerland is severely restricting electric vehicles this winter, because of power supply concerns.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...shortages.html
No no no, it can’t be! We were told that EV is our future and the only hope to survive! That is why the state of California banning all gas cars- right?
And Justine said he will power all EVs by himself, just like the budget that balances itself…
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-02-2022, 12:35 PM
trapperdodge trapperdodge is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Alberta
Posts: 546
Default

What's gonna happen when it gets cold?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-02-2022, 01:29 PM
ruffy71 ruffy71 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 388
Default

I know there is always a concern with a nuclear accident, but I hear people mention the radioactive waste all the time. Has there ever been an incident or issue with stored nuclear waste in this country?

Considering how deep we can drill for oil and gas, is there really an issue with burying the stuff deep enough?

I was listening to a nuclear energy rep on the radio the other day, and even when you factor his bias in, he made some good points about the difference between what people think and fear about nuclear energy in Canada, and the reality being very different.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-02-2022, 03:08 PM
Dylan15 Dylan15 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 157
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
So another electric grid alert and we are being advised to conserve electricity. So lets add another million electric vehicles or so, and watch what happens.
Conspiracy theory alert. Could it be that the powers that be don't WANT you to drive your car wherever and whenever you want? You can be 100% sure the federal government who wants to ban gas powered cars by 2030 knows the grid can't handle it. Yet they push them. Why? Follow the power. Covid lockdowns were a test run.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-02-2022, 03:19 PM
lmtada's Avatar
lmtada lmtada is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,082
Default

I better turn off the Xmas lights.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-02-2022, 03:25 PM
marky_mark marky_mark is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,701
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ruffy71 View Post
I know there is always a concern with a nuclear accident, but I hear people mention the radioactive waste all the time. Has there ever been an incident or issue with stored nuclear waste in this country?

Considering how deep we can drill for oil and gas, is there really an issue with burying the stuff deep enough?

I was listening to a nuclear energy rep on the radio the other day, and even when you factor his bias in, he made some good points about the difference between what people think and fear about nuclear energy in Canada, and the reality being very different.
New generation nuclear plants have zero risk and next to no waste
People are naive
Train cars of unrefined uranium roll through alberta all the time
Being shipped all around the globe, just like our coal
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-02-2022, 04:00 PM
Dick284's Avatar
Dick284 Dick284 is online now
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dreadful Valley
Posts: 14,620
Default

I wonder out loud if the Christmas lights at the Legislature, and various city/town halls etc. were turned off during this crisis?
__________________


There are no absolutes
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 12-02-2022, 04:03 PM
Drewski Canuck Drewski Canuck is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,960
Default

There are played out Gold Mines and Nickel Mines that are over a mile underground. That is alot of metals heavy rock to absorb any radiation that could ever leak.

Nuclear is a viable option.

Drewski
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-02-2022, 04:05 PM
elkoholik elkoholik is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 338
Default too much draw

My buddies neighbour bought a new ford lightening truck. He has a swim tub in the backyard, was able to upgrade to 160amp (might be 140, but know he couldn't get 200amp in his house) in a new house and because of the amp draw he can not charge his truck at home right now without tripping breaker. Pretty sad considering we currently have less than 5% Electric Vehicles on the road.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-02-2022, 04:11 PM
marky_mark marky_mark is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,701
Default

The grid can’t handle everyone owning electric vehicles
Even if you build more reactors, the distribution systems will be the next weak link
It would probably cost over a trillion dollars for every home in canada to be ready for electric vehicles
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-02-2022, 04:16 PM
stubblejumper01 stubblejumper01 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Busby AB
Posts: 837
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by marky_mark View Post
New generation nuclear plants have zero risk and next to no waste
People are naive
Train cars of unrefined uranium roll through alberta all the time
Being shipped all around the globe, just like our coal
That’s for sure. I think the biggest risk could be someone blowing them up to release the uranium like a dirty bomb?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-02-2022, 04:17 PM
MountainTi's Avatar
MountainTi MountainTi is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caroline
Posts: 7,271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drewski Canuck View Post
There are played out Gold Mines and Nickel Mines that are over a mile underground. That is alot of metals heavy rock to absorb any radiation that could ever leak.

Nuclear is a viable option.

Drewski
https://calgaryherald.com/sponsored/...heres-the-plan

Disposal site is a ways away yet. Close to 10 years before construction would even begin
__________________
Two reasons you may think CO2 is a pollutant
1.You weren't paying attention in grade 5
2. You're stupid
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-02-2022, 04:21 PM
ruffy71 ruffy71 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 388
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by marky_mark View Post
New generation nuclear plants have zero risk and next to no waste
People are naive
Train cars of unrefined uranium roll through alberta all the time
Being shipped all around the globe, just like our coal
The fella on the radio was explaining that radioactive decay is exponential, (I remember that from somewhere in school), and that spent fuel has relatively low levels or radioactivity, if I remember correctly he said after 100 years, you could hold it in your hand. Probably don't want to eat it, or sleep with it under your bed your whole life, but is it really anywhere as risky as the average joe thinks?

I love the show Chernobyl, still think it is one of the best miniseries I've ever seen, but if that is what people still think about modern reactors, their risks, and the risk of the waste, yeeeesh that industry is starting in a really deep hole.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-02-2022, 04:27 PM
fordtruckin's Avatar
fordtruckin fordtruckin is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: In the woods
Posts: 8,923
Default

I have no doubt electric is the future BUT NOT the near future. The power grid and technology are not advanced enough to the point where it’s feasible or reliable enough to do a complete 100% change! Hell I wouldn’t even say we could do a 5-10% change. As for nuclear yes the most viable option but because of 3 disasters people are scared.
__________________
I feel I was denied, critical, need to know Information!
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-02-2022, 04:57 PM
kokanee king kokanee king is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2022
Location: St John Rd ON
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
So another electric grid alert and we are being advised to conserve electricity. So lets add another million electric vehicles or so, and watch what happens.
A development we ain't ready for
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12-02-2022, 05:22 PM
Map Maker Map Maker is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 1,531
Default

When was the main electrical grid built?
What was the average panel size on a house at that time?
20 years ago people were complaining that a/c were causing blackouts.
Electric cars are mostly charged during the night at lowest demand.
No to nuclear power.

We just need some smart people planning the future of Alberta.

The newest national electrical code has an upsizing of all new installations.

Even though Fortis is making massive profits, since it is deregulated, they have been enjoying the money and putting minimal back into upgrading capital infrastructure. Now we all pay.
My thoughts.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 12-02-2022, 05:39 PM
Grizzly Adams1 Grizzly Adams1 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 3,793
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stubblejumper01 View Post
That’s for sure. I think the biggest risk could be someone blowing them up to release the uranium like a dirty bomb?
Unrefined uranium ore is only slightly radioactive and not really dangerous. When I was a teen, I requested a sample from the mine in Northern Saskatchewan, for a science project. They sent me about 5 lbs.

Grizz
__________________
Woe unto them that join house to house, that lay field to field, till there is no place, that they be alone in the midst of the Earth.

Isaiah 5:8
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.