Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Hunting Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-20-2014, 09:52 PM
ThreeD ThreeD is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Cold Lake
Posts: 222
Default Supp Antlerless Tags Gonein Some 500 Series

I saw in the 2014 regs online today that the antlerless Supp WT tags are gone for a host of 500 zones.

Hopefully it will help rebuild some deer numbers here in the northeast. Tough winter here last year for sure, so hard to argue the reduction in harvest.
__________________
3D
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-21-2014, 08:17 AM
Hair trigger Hair trigger is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 159
Default

An excellent decision in my opinion.

HT
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-21-2014, 08:20 AM
muleyhunter7 muleyhunter7 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 375
Default

Hopefully get rid of all female tags in my opinion
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-21-2014, 08:24 AM
kevpack's Avatar
kevpack kevpack is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lethbridge
Posts: 295
Default

300 also.
__________________
The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter - Sir Winston Churchill.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-21-2014, 08:25 AM
kevpack's Avatar
kevpack kevpack is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lethbridge
Posts: 295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by muleyhunter7 View Post
Hopefully get rid of all female tags in my opinion
that's just bad science
__________________
The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter - Sir Winston Churchill.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-21-2014, 08:46 AM
honda610 honda610 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: 509
Posts: 857
Default

I have hunted some of the 500 series areas affected in the past and they are a shell of what they used to be. Hit hard by weather, wolves and road hunters. Some zones you have a very hard time getting permission from land owners. They have had enough from the Fort Mcmurray croud.... and no iam not picking on just them I was born and raised their. But when meeting land owners last fall the first question was were are you from? Fort mac ? It makes a guy wonder. Good luck this fall have a safe summer.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-21-2014, 08:50 AM
ADH's Avatar
ADH ADH is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Strathcona County
Posts: 340
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kevpack View Post
that's just bad science
Are you saying removing doe tags is bad science? Im a little confused at this.

What is the theory here? If each doe can give birth to one or two fawns and a single buck can fertilize more than one doe, wouldn't it make sense to harvest less does and more 3 4 or 5 year old management bucks?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-21-2014, 09:38 AM
Preux86 Preux86 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Alberta
Posts: 197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ADH View Post
Are you saying removing doe tags is bad science? Im a little confused at this.

What is the theory here? If each doe can give birth to one or two fawns and a single buck can fertilize more than one doe, wouldn't it make sense to harvest less does and more 3 4 or 5 year old management bucks?
Im down for the removal of the supplemental tags for the affected zones. What im sure he means by bad science,is the fact that a specific herd full of old does who can no longer be bred will affect the overall population of the herd anyways. So removing any tags for does will have a negative effect on birthing rates.
Maby it just comes down to common sense as well. You want to hunt a doe?well make sure she dosent have a fawn. You want a buck?well dont be shooting every fork horn.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-21-2014, 09:48 AM
ADH's Avatar
ADH ADH is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Strathcona County
Posts: 340
Default

seems to be working with elk pops and the regs.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-21-2014, 10:28 AM
muleyhunter7 muleyhunter7 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 375
Default

I wish they would get rid of cow moose and calf moose draw for sure and put a limit on whitetail buck say 125 minimum type thing maybe wed start seeing some big bucks but thats my opinion shooting a cow moose is defiantly no challenge to me
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-21-2014, 10:38 AM
dmcbride dmcbride is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bazeau County East side
Posts: 4,188
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by muleyhunter7 View Post
I wish they would get rid of cow moose and calf moose draw for sure and put a limit on whitetail buck say 125 minimum type thing maybe wed start seeing some big bucks but thats my opinion shooting a cow moose is defiantly no challenge to me
I wish there was a minimum on the whitetail buck too. But not everybody is a trophy hunter and meat should come first. You can't eat antlers and the anti's, well we all know what they think of trophy hunters.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-21-2014, 10:42 AM
BigJon BigJon is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Peace River
Posts: 1,264
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by muleyhunter7 View Post
I wish they would get rid of cow moose and calf moose draw for sure and put a limit on whitetail buck say 125 minimum type thing maybe wed start seeing some big bucks but thats my opinion shooting a cow moose is defiantly no challenge to me
So, no doe tags and every hunter should be able to field judge a deer to make sure it makes 125"?

I'm not much a doe hunter and I don't care to shoot small bucks myself but some people just like to get out and bring home a deer for the freezer. Some youngsters and old timers probably don't have it in them to hunt as hard or as long for trophy size animals either.

You should also keep in mind that the goal of hunting seasons isn't to end the season with the maximum amount of deer/moose (whatever) out there on the landscape. In some areas a reduction of herd size is the desired goal.

Regardless, I do believe it's overdue to cut back on the antlerless deer tags in many areas of the province.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-21-2014, 10:43 AM
pdfish's Avatar
pdfish pdfish is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Spruce Grove
Posts: 1,498
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by muleyhunter7 View Post
I wish they would get rid of cow moose and calf moose draw for sure and put a limit on whitetail buck say 125 minimum type thing maybe wed start seeing some big bucks but thats my opinion shooting a cow moose is defiantly no challenge to me
Good luck with the minimum!! How many guys would actually be able to confidently score a buck while its moving? Not many, that would just lead to a lot of questionable deer being left to rot in the bush.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-21-2014, 10:48 AM
catnthehat's Avatar
catnthehat catnthehat is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,585
Default

I've never tried to eat antlers but I've been told they are pretty tough!
Cat
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-21-2014, 11:31 AM
muleyhunter7 muleyhunter7 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 375
Default

125 is not very hard to figure out im not a professional by any means but honestly if your cant find a 140+ deer in ab your not hunting very hard
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-21-2014, 11:36 AM
Sooner Sooner is online now
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 9,677
Default

In the 500 zone(516) I have hunted in for years now, I have hunted pre supplemental times to now and imo, once supplemental tags came out, the numbers of deer have tanked. I used to see lots of does with 2 fawns and a wide range of young bucks up to some nice ones for that area. It was not uncommon for me to pass on a lot of 2 to 3 point meat bucks waiting for a chance at one of the bigger bucks, if that didn't happen i could always close a tag during the last week on a meat buck. That hasn't happened for a few years now. Now you go all season and only see a few bucks, even the trails, tracks and scrapes you used to see are minimal. Not a biologist but it was better when you could shoot either or on a general tag only. Dad went after either a meat buck or a doe without fawns and I chased bucks. At best 2 deer got harvested. Once the supplemental draw came out, lots of trucks had 2 or more does in them or hanging in camps and then a buck or two. The does took a big hit for a few years and now it shows in the herd numbers. The deer numbers were already going down before the last few bad winters up there. Add in some more wolves which didn't help either. I haven't checked the new regs yet but wouldn't be sad if this zone didn't have supplemental draws anymore.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-21-2014, 11:39 AM
Lefty-Canuck's Avatar
Lefty-Canuck Lefty-Canuck is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Look behind you :)
Posts: 27,780
Default

Usually the folks I hear complaining about not seeing decent buck always end up with one that is 3-4 years old....I wonder where the big bucks are

You can't shoot a 160+ inch deer if you keep shooting the 130 inch bucks, nurture your areas and have some restraint.

If you aren't happy with what you are shooting....don't shoot, a measure of hunting success is not always the kill, the antler, or the meat. To me it's the full package. My season would be extremely short if I took the first thing I saw.

LC
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-21-2014, 11:42 AM
dmcbride dmcbride is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bazeau County East side
Posts: 4,188
Default 2014 hunting regs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sooner View Post
In the 500 zone(516) I have hunted in for years now, I have hunted pre supplemental times to now and imo, once supplemental tags came out, the numbers of deer have tanked. I used to see lots of does with 2 fawns and a wide range of young bucks up to some nice ones for that area. It was not uncommon for me to pass on a lot of 2 to 3 point meat bucks waiting for a chance at one of the bigger bucks, if that didn't happen i could always close a tag during the last week on a meat buck. That hasn't happened for a few years now. Now you go all season and only see a few bucks, even the trails, tracks and scrapes you used to see are minimal. Not a biologist but it was better when you could shoot either or on a general tag only. Dad went after either a meat buck or a doe without fawns and I chased bucks. At best 2 deer got harvested. Once the supplemental draw came out, lots of trucks had 2 or more does in them or hanging in camps and then a buck or two. The does took a big hit for a few years and now it shows in the herd numbers. The deer numbers were already going down before the last few bad winters up there. Add in some more wolves which didn't help either. I haven't checked the new regs yet but wouldn't be sad if this zone didn't have supplemental draws anymore.
The Supplemental Antlerless White-tailed Deer Licence will be issued with 2 tags and is valid only in WMUs 505, 507-512, 515-521, 523-531 and
534-544.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-21-2014, 11:46 AM
FishHunterPro FishHunterPro is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,247
Default

I wish they would have added a few more wmu's to that list.
__________________
Never celebrate till you got your knife stuck in it !

Some times you catch the Big fish, some times you get stuck in Chip

Last edited by FishHunterPro; 07-21-2014 at 11:57 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-21-2014, 11:51 AM
Big Racks's Avatar
Big Racks Big Racks is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 1,358
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lefty-Canuck View Post
Usually the folks I hear complaining about not seeing decent buck always end up with one that is 3-4 years old....I wonder where the big bucks are

You can't shoot a 160+ inch deer if you keep shooting the 130 inch bucks, nurture your areas and have some restraint.

If you aren't happy with what you are shooting....don't shoot, a measure of hunting success is not always the kill, the antler, or the meat. To me it's the full package. My season would be extremely short if I took the first thing I saw.

LC
Well said LC. I know I've been guilty of it myself. I never really thought of it as being hypocritical, but now that I examine my patterns the last few years, that's exactly how it's been for me. Lamenting the lack of quality bucks most of the season, passing on a few mid-size animals, then come last half of the last day of the season my selectiveness has gone out the window as I rush to fill the freezer. Last year my general was cut on a WT doe 20 minutes before last shot on the last day. I don't NEED the meat per se, just the thought of tag soup again drove me to it. Now I feel shame...
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 07-21-2014, 12:07 PM
catnthehat's Avatar
catnthehat catnthehat is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,585
Default

The people I know that are head hunters that hunt the same areas I do in the 500's normally don't have an issue putting big bucks on the ground.
I have killed some decent bucks myself , but don't look for them as I a a meat hunter.
Cat
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-21-2014, 12:11 PM
Lefty-Canuck's Avatar
Lefty-Canuck Lefty-Canuck is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Look behind you :)
Posts: 27,780
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Racks View Post
Well said LC. I know I've been guilty of it myself. I never really thought of it as being hypocritical, but now that I examine my patterns the last few years, that's exactly how it's been for me. Lamenting the lack of quality bucks most of the season, passing on a few mid-size animals, then come last half of the last day of the season my selectiveness has gone out the window as I rush to fill the freezer. Last year my general was cut on a WT doe 20 minutes before last shot on the last day. I don't NEED the meat per se, just the thought of tag soup again drove me to it. Now I feel shame...
Here is something I read a little while back about the stages a hunter goes through....I think there is a fair bit of merit and truth to this.

Often I think this progression is a factor in how hunters treat each other, if someone is in a conflicting stage of hunting with another they may treat them differently and be overly harsh....forgetting at some point they were in the exact same early stage at one point.

FIVE STAGES OF A HUNTER

Hunters change through the years. Factors used to determine
"successful hunting" change as well for each hunter. A hunter's age,
role models, and his years of hunting experience affect his ideas of
"success."

Many hunters may fit into one of the following five groups. In
1975-1980, groups of over 1,000 hunters in Wisconsin were studied,
surveyed, and written about by Professors Robert Jackson and Robert
Norton, University of Wisconsin-La Crosse. The results of their
studies form a widely accepted theory of hunter behavior and
development. Where are you now? Where would you like to be?

SHOOTER STAGE

The hunter talks about satisfaction with hunting being closely tied to
being able to "get shooting." Often the beginning duck hunter will
relate he had an excellent day if he got in a lot of shooting. The
beginning deer hunter will talk about the number of shooting
opportunities. Missing game means little to hunters in this phase. A
beginning hunter wants to pull the trigger and test the capability of
his firearm. A hunter in this stage may be a dangerous hunting
partner.

LIMITING OUT STAGE

A hunter still talks about satisfaction gained from shooting. But what
seems more important is measuring success through the killing of game
and the number of birds or animals shot. Limiting out, or filling a
tag, is the absolute measure. Do not let your desire to limit out be
stronger than the need for safe behavior at all times.

TROPHY STAGE

Satisfaction is described in terms of selectivity of game. A duck
hunter might take only greenheads. A deer hunter looks for one special
deer. A hunter might travel far to find a real trophy animal. Shooting
opportunity and skills become less important.

METHOD STAGE

This hunter has all the special equipment. Hunting has become one of
the most important things in his life. Satisfaction comes from the
method that enables the hunter to take game. Taking game is important,
but second to how it is taken. This hunter will study long and hard
how best to pick a blind site, lay out decoys, and call in
waterfowl. A deer hunter will go one on one with a white-tailed deer,
studying sign, tracking, and the life habits of the deer. Often, the
hunter will handicap himself by hunting only with black powder
firearms or bow and arrow. Bagging game, or limiting, still is
understood as being a necessary part of the hunt during this phase.

SPORTSMAN STAGE

As a hunter ages and after many years of hunting, he "mellows out."
Satisfaction now can be found in the total hunting experience. Being
in the field, enjoying the company of friends and family, and seeing
nature outweigh the need for taking game.

Not all hunters go through all the stages, or go through them in that
particular order. It is also possible for hunters who pursue several
species of game to be in different stages with regard to each
species. Some hunters feel that role models of good sportsmen,
training, or reading books or magazines helped them pass more quickly
through some stages.

---------------
California Department of Fish and Game. "California Hunter Education
Manual". 1995 (revised edition). Sacramento, California. [p.8]

LC
__________________

Last edited by Lefty-Canuck; 07-21-2014 at 12:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-21-2014, 12:27 PM
Preux86 Preux86 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Alberta
Posts: 197
Default

Thats a pretty accurate article in my opinion LC.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-21-2014, 02:49 PM
BigJon BigJon is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Peace River
Posts: 1,264
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by muleyhunter7 View Post
125 is not very hard to figure out im not a professional by any means but honestly if your cant find a 140+ deer in ab your not hunting very hard
In many areas and for many people a 140" buck isn't particularly challenging. However, in other parts of the province a 140" whitetail is not a common creature.

I'd also hate to see a 75 year old seasoned hunter or the 14 year old first timer who doesn't have the slightest care for inches of bone get nipped for the 117" whitetail they shot.

Simply put, your idea sucks.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-21-2014, 02:52 PM
Sooner Sooner is online now
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 9,677
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lefty-Canuck View Post
Usually the folks I hear complaining about not seeing decent buck always end up with one that is 3-4 years old....I wonder where the big bucks are

You can't shoot a 160+ inch deer if you keep shooting the 130 inch bucks, nurture your areas and have some restraint.

If you aren't happy with what you are shooting....don't shoot, a measure of hunting success is not always the kill, the antler, or the meat. To me it's the full package. My season would be extremely short if I took the first thing I saw.

LC

A 160+ class buck is a bit rare where i hunt but the outfitter guide i know says they are out there, never expect to see a booner out there, maybe i will be surprised on day. I had the chance to shoot a buck a couple times last season but chose not too as I had some moose meat left. Even my old shoot the first thing you see meat deer dad didn't take one out of the zone. It fast became a good time out kinda season and we made a choice to leave some behind for next year, hopefully it all went well over the winter. Disappointed in the deer numbers but not the time spent in the zone. Hopefully the next scout trip will show something better for numbers as I didn't get out with the sleds during the winter or spring.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-21-2014, 05:17 PM
sns2's Avatar
sns2 sns2 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: My House
Posts: 13,466
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lefty-Canuck View Post
nurture your areas and have some restraint...
LC
I have lots of restraint. I will never shoot a spiker because I hold at for the big forkers
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-21-2014, 05:34 PM
hal53's Avatar
hal53 hal53 is offline
Gone Hunting
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lougheed,Ab.
Posts: 12,736
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sns2 View Post
I have lots of restraint. I will never shoot a spiker because I hold at for the big forkers
We all know what you meant by "big forkers"...now I will have to report you under the new rules........
__________________
The future ain't what it used to be - Yogi Berra
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-21-2014, 07:24 PM
kevpack's Avatar
kevpack kevpack is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lethbridge
Posts: 295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ADH View Post
Are you saying removing doe tags is bad science? Im a little confused at this.

What is the theory here? If each doe can give birth to one or two fawns and a single buck can fertilize more than one doe, wouldn't it make sense to harvest less does and more 3 4 or 5 year old management bucks?
I'm saying a lot of WMU may need to cut back the doe tags but all is bad science
__________________
The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter - Sir Winston Churchill.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-22-2014, 09:55 AM
CountryLife94's Avatar
CountryLife94 CountryLife94 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Northern Alberta
Posts: 246
Default

Couldn't be any happier about this!! Had a group of guys on the land I hunt take out far too many does that last couple years..haven't taken a doe myself on that land for 3 years as numbers kept diminishing. Wouldn't mind if they even went to a draw system in a couple wmu's with only antlered whitetail being an option. Buck to doe ratio the last couple of weekends of scouting i
had easily been 3:1 and the total deer numbers are the worst they've been in a long time
__________________
Nothing better than having your old man as your hunting partner
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-22-2014, 01:57 PM
3blade's Avatar
3blade 3blade is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 5,167
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by muleyhunter7 View Post
125 is not very hard to figure out im not a professional by any means but honestly if your cant find a 140+ deer in ab your not hunting very hard
All hail the wise muleyhunter...the underside of your bridge is covered with "booner" headgear?

I don't concern myself with bone measurement contests, but you go ahead and do what ya gotta do....

Yeah, there's a few zones where the does need a break, winters have been rough. You want more deer? Spend the gas and go shoot more predators. Lot of guys whine without taking an active part in management.
__________________
“Nothing is more persistent than a liberal with a dumb idea” - Ebrand
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.