Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-18-2015, 12:09 PM
FishingMOM FishingMOM is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,599
Thumbs down stupid judge

Khadar can now wander freely.
No more monitoring him with a bracelet either.

http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/al...034/story.html
__________________

Last edited by FishingMOM; 09-18-2015 at 12:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-18-2015, 12:15 PM
Klondike Klondike is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sherwood Park
Posts: 714
Default

Just wow.

But its no real surprise considering a guy goes from being an ambulance chaser held in low regard to the right honorable judge with the stroke of a politicians pen
__________________
at the end of the day Al Gore will go down in history as the biggest snake oil salesman to have walked the earth

Who are you going to blame when all the ohv's are gone and the fish are still dieing
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-18-2015, 12:17 PM
FishingMOM FishingMOM is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,599
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Icatchfish View Post
why you callin the judge stupid? would you like it if I called you stupid.

big meany
It's the politest thing I can come up with to express my feelings on this matter.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-18-2015, 12:34 PM
deerguy deerguy is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,718
Default

Very biased pro khadr article. I am not impressed.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-18-2015, 12:37 PM
artie artie is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,939
Default

at least now he can get to his prayers in the morning
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-18-2015, 12:42 PM
JustMe JustMe is offline
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,414
Default

Yup, just like that guy that murdered that little girl this week.... They're both murderers and should be treated as such! Who nominated/placed this "judge?"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Icatchfish View Post
hes a a good kid who just made a mistake. cut him some slack
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-18-2015, 02:46 PM
deerhunter deerhunter is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Just North of the North Sask. River
Posts: 1,211
Default

He does have 676 posts
Lol
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-18-2015, 02:46 PM
JustMe JustMe is offline
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,414
Default

Excuse me??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Icatchfish View Post
sure, send that guy for 10 year to gitmo where he can be anally fed and water boarded, hypothermia tortured and locked in a cage. then bring him back.

at least this was a brain washed 14 yr old who was in an actual war situation. not a 22 year old who went into someones house and killed them, then murdered a 2 year old.

keep on bigotting buddy.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-18-2015, 02:59 PM
Zuludog's Avatar
Zuludog Zuludog is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Beaumont
Posts: 3,389
Default

Hell in a hand basket.
__________________
The kill is the satisfying, indeed essential, conclusion to a successful hunt. But, I take no pleasure in the act itself. One does not hunt in order to kill, but kills in order to have hunted. Then why do I hunt? I hunt for the same reason my well-fed cat hunts...because I must, because it is in the blood, because I am the decendent of a thousand generations of hunters. I hunt because I am a hunter.- Finn Aagard
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-18-2015, 04:46 PM
KGB's Avatar
KGB KGB is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by deerhunter View Post
He does have 676 posts
Lol
I wouldn't be surprised if most of them are trolls... Only person in total denial can say things like this.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-18-2015, 05:11 PM
Grizzly Adams's Avatar
Grizzly Adams Grizzly Adams is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 21,399
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Icatchfish View Post
why you callin the judge stupid? would you like it if I called you stupid.

big meany

I think that would put you in contempt of court, might be in Omar's cell if he hears about it. .

Grizz
__________________
"Indeed, no human being has yet lived under conditions which, considering the prevailing climates of the past, can be regarded as normal."
John E. Pfeiffer The Emergence of Man
written in 1969
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-18-2015, 05:18 PM
FishingMOM FishingMOM is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,599
Default

It is disturbing that we have a judge letting this guy having any freedom in Alberta and in Canada.

As a Canadian I am upset that we allow such scum wander our streets. I don't care he was 15. My 10 yr old knows right from wrong. So don't feed me bunk that he didn't know better.

I'm tired of our judges slapping murders on the wrist and saying bad boy, please play nice.

We got jasmine Richardson, ohmar khadar,
We are paying for both their educations and they are both free in Alberta.
Oh and for good measure we allow these turds to change their names

In documents filed in the Alberta Court of Appeal, Jeremy Steinke said he is now going by the name Jackson May. He was allowed to legally change his name.

Another example is Karla Holmoka who Changed it to Karla Teale

Sickening.
__________________

Last edited by FishingMOM; 09-18-2015 at 05:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-18-2015, 06:23 PM
Icatchfish Icatchfish is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 681
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FishingMOM View Post
It is disturbing that we have a judge letting this guy having any freedom in Alberta and in Canada.

As a Canadian I am upset that we allow such scum wander our streets. I don't care he was 15. My 10 yr old knows right from wrong. So don't feed me bunk that he didn't know better.

I'm tired of our judges slapping murders on the wrist and saying bad boy, please play nice.

We got jasmine Richardson, ohmar khadar,
We are paying for both their educations and they are both free in Alberta.
Oh and for good measure we allow these turds to change their names

In documents filed in the Alberta Court of Appeal, Jeremy Steinke said he is now going by the name Jackson May. He was allowed to legally change his name.

Another example is Karla Holmoka who Changed it to Karla Teale

Sickening.
Maybe your're a judge. But I have a slight susceptible that you work at 7/11. Leave the law to who knows it
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-18-2015, 06:39 PM
schmedlap schmedlap is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,692
Default Sorry, but ....

your anger is totally misdirected at the Judge, and calling her "stupid" is just plain misinformed. Justice Ross is, as it happens, an excellent, smart, and conscientious judge, who does not let her own personal biases (which may fall on one side or the other here?) get in the way of her decisions. Do you not think she knows very well that this is not a "popular" decision? I can imagine her own personal distaste at even having to be the one assigned to handle the case - I'm quite sure there was no competition amongst judges to be assigned - quite the opposite - her reputation is likely to be smeared (as it is unjustly being by you and others here, on a very ignorant basis) no matter what she decides.

Personally, I think Khadr and his family are scum, I don't have the least sympathy for him, and I'd prefer to have seen him rot in prison forever. But the judge is duty bound, if he/she is the least interested in fulfilling his/her oath of office, to decipher and apply the law of Canada on such matters, as argued based on applicable statute and caselaw and contextual facts by, Khadr's lawyers on one side, and the government lawyers on the other. In very diligently doing so, she made her decision. She can't just "make it up as she goes" - if she does or did, the Court of Appeal will set her straight, and they might(?).

The blame for such results does not lie upon any judges, at all. It lies upon the legislators (Parliament) for the state of the law, and their failure to correct it, and/or upon the legal representatives of the government who were "overmatched" in their arguments by Khadr's lawyers. If you want to direct your anger at someone on this point, then start by asking your MP, or the relevant Minister, what they plan to do to alter the background laws that lead to such results.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-18-2015, 07:04 PM
CNP's Avatar
CNP CNP is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: WMU 303
Posts: 8,493
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Icatchfish View Post
Maybe your're a judge. But I have a slight susceptible that you work at 7/11. Leave the law to who knows it
Grade 4 English?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-18-2015, 07:24 PM
kevinhits kevinhits is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 4,340
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Icatchfish View Post
Maybe your're a judge. But I have a slight susceptible that you work at 7/11. Leave the law to who knows it
You need to retreat back to the fishing forum where you maybe belong....
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-18-2015, 07:27 PM
JohninAB's Avatar
JohninAB JohninAB is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: West Central Alberta
Posts: 6,670
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FishingMOM View Post
It is disturbing that we have a judge letting this guy having any freedom in Alberta and in Canada.

As a Canadian I am upset that we allow such scum wander our streets. I don't care he was 15. My 10 yr old knows right from wrong. So don't feed me bunk that he didn't know better.

I'm tired of our judges slapping murders on the wrist and saying bad boy, please play nice.

We got jasmine Richardson, ohmar khadar,
We are paying for both their educations and they are both free in Alberta.
Oh and for good measure we allow these turds to change their names

In documents filed in the Alberta Court of Appeal, Jeremy Steinke said he is now going by the name Jackson May. He was allowed to legally change his name.

Another example is Karla Holmoka who Changed it to Karla Teale

Sickening.
Karla served her time.


If you do not like how this judge handled this case, then by all means, go and discuss it with the judge.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-18-2015, 10:55 PM
huntsfurfish huntsfurfish is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 7,350
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by schmedlap View Post
your anger is totally misdirected at the Judge, and calling her "stupid" is just plain misinformed. Justice Ross is, as it happens, an excellent, smart, and conscientious judge, who does not let her own personal biases (which may fall on one side or the other here?) get in the way of her decisions. Do you not think she knows very well that this is not a "popular" decision? I can imagine her own personal distaste at even having to be the one assigned to handle the case - I'm quite sure there was no competition amongst judges to be assigned - quite the opposite - her reputation is likely to be smeared (as it is unjustly being by you and others here, on a very ignorant basis) no matter what she decides.

Personally, I think Khadr and his family are scum, I don't have the least sympathy for him, and I'd prefer to have seen him rot in prison forever. But the judge is duty bound, if he/she is the least interested in fulfilling his/her oath of office, to decipher and apply the law of Canada on such matters, as argued based on applicable statute and caselaw and contextual facts by, Khadr's lawyers on one side, and the government lawyers on the other. In very diligently doing so, she made her decision. She can't just "make it up as she goes" - if she does or did, the Court of Appeal will set her straight, and they might(?).

The blame for such results does not lie upon any judges, at all. It lies upon the legislators (Parliament) for the state of the law, and their failure to correct it, and/or upon the legal representatives of the government who were "overmatched" in their arguments by Khadr's lawyers. If you want to direct your anger at someone on this point, then start by asking your MP, or the relevant Minister, what they plan to do to alter the background laws that lead to such results.
Very well said!
__________________
.
eat a snickers


made in Alberta__ born n raised.


FS-Tinfool hats by the roll.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-18-2015, 11:32 PM
Weedy1 Weedy1 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,485
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by schmedlap View Post
your anger is totally misdirected at the Judge, and calling her "stupid" is just plain misinformed. Justice Ross is, as it happens, an excellent, smart, and conscientious judge, who does not let her own personal biases (which may fall on one side or the other here?) get in the way of her decisions. Do you not think she knows very well that this is not a "popular" decision? I can imagine her own personal distaste at even having to be the one assigned to handle the case - I'm quite sure there was no competition amongst judges to be assigned - quite the opposite - her reputation is likely to be smeared (as it is unjustly being by you and others here, on a very ignorant basis) no matter what she decides.

Personally, I think Khadr and his family are scum, I don't have the least sympathy for him, and I'd prefer to have seen him rot in prison forever. But the judge is duty bound, if he/she is the least interested in fulfilling his/her oath of office, to decipher and apply the law of Canada on such matters, as argued based on applicable statute and caselaw and contextual facts by, Khadr's lawyers on one side, and the government lawyers on the other. In very diligently doing so, she made her decision. She can't just "make it up as she goes" - if she does or did, the Court of Appeal will set her straight, and they might(?).

The blame for such results does not lie upon any judges, at all. It lies upon the legislators (Parliament) for the state of the law, and their failure to correct it, and/or upon the legal representatives of the government who were "overmatched" in their arguments by Khadr's lawyers. If you want to direct your anger at someone on this point, then start by asking your MP, or the relevant Minister, what they plan to do to alter the background laws that lead to such results.
Thank you!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-19-2015, 01:02 PM
Headdamage Headdamage is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 697
Default

There are a lot of people the courts let out on the streets that I'm more concerned about than a guy that did something in another country when he was 14 years old.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 09-19-2015, 01:10 PM
deerguy deerguy is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,718
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Headdamage View Post
There are a lot of people the courts let out on the streets that I'm more concerned about than a guy that did something in another country when he was 14 years old.
He is an afghani terrorist, he should have been shot by the Americans back in his homeland.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-19-2015, 09:30 PM
nenaj nenaj is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by deerguy View Post
He is an afghani terrorist, he should have been shot by the Americans back in his homeland.
Huh? His homeland is Canada.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-19-2015, 09:46 PM
purgatory.sv purgatory.sv is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,296
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by schmedlap View Post
your anger is totally misdirected at the Judge, and calling her "stupid" is just plain misinformed. Justice Ross is, as it happens, an excellent, smart, and conscientious judge, who does not let her own personal biases (which may fall on one side or the other here?) get in the way of her decisions. Do you not think she knows very well that this is not a "popular" decision? I can imagine her own personal distaste at even having to be the one assigned to handle the case - I'm quite sure there was no competition amongst judges to be assigned - quite the opposite - her reputation is likely to be smeared (as it is unjustly being by you and others here, on a very ignorant basis) no matter what she decides.

Personally, I think Khadr and his family are scum, I don't have the least sympathy for him, and I'd prefer to have seen him rot in prison forever. But the judge is duty bound, if he/she is the least interested in fulfilling his/her oath of office, to decipher and apply the law of Canada on such matters, as argued based on applicable statute and caselaw and contextual facts by, Khadr's lawyers on one side, and the government lawyers on the other. In very diligently doing so, she made her decision. She can't just "make it up as she goes" - if she does or did, the Court of Appeal will set her straight, and they might(?).

The blame for such results does not lie upon any judges, at all. It lies upon the legislators (Parliament) for the state of the law, and their failure to correct it, and/or upon the legal representatives of the government who were "overmatched" in their arguments by Khadr's lawyers. If you want to direct your anger at someone on this point, then start by asking your MP, or the relevant Minister, what they plan to do to alter the background laws that lead to such results.



I do not always agree with what you post.
But this is true.
If they do not always agree they will qualify.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-19-2015, 09:54 PM
ETOWNCANUCK ETOWNCANUCK is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,900
Default

This is Canada

We have a legal system
Not a justice system

And on that note were he in front of a judge not in Canada his fate most certainly would have been different at this stage of his legal matters

Kid you not
Our system is a joke and decades will pass and governing parties will come and go with nary much change.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-19-2015, 10:04 PM
roper1 roper1 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Strathmore
Posts: 5,625
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by schmedlap View Post
your anger is totally misdirected at the Judge, and calling her "stupid" is just plain misinformed. Justice Ross is, as it happens, an excellent, smart, and conscientious judge, who does not let her own personal biases (which may fall on one side or the other here?) get in the way of her decisions. Do you not think she knows very well that this is not a "popular" decision? I can imagine her own personal distaste at even having to be the one assigned to handle the case - I'm quite sure there was no competition amongst judges to be assigned - quite the opposite - her reputation is likely to be smeared (as it is unjustly being by you and others here, on a very ignorant basis) no matter what she decides.

Personally, I think Khadr and his family are scum, I don't have the least sympathy for him, and I'd prefer to have seen him rot in prison forever. But the judge is duty bound, if he/she is the least interested in fulfilling his/her oath of office, to decipher and apply the law of Canada on such matters, as argued based on applicable statute and caselaw and contextual facts by, Khadr's lawyers on one side, and the government lawyers on the other. In very diligently doing so, she made her decision. She can't just "make it up as she goes" - if she does or did, the Court of Appeal will set her straight, and they might(?).

The blame for such results does not lie upon any judges, at all. It lies upon the legislators (Parliament) for the state of the law, and their failure to correct it, and/or upon the legal representatives of the government who were "overmatched" in their arguments by Khadr's lawyers. If you want to direct your anger at someone on this point, then start by asking your MP, or the relevant Minister, what they plan to do to alter the background laws that lead to such results.
Gotta disagree here buddy, she can't be jim-dandy, excellent, smart, conscientious, etc., on one hand.....then have Khadr's lawyer overmatch the gov't schmuck. She is either bright enough to see the forest for the trees ...or not!! To say she is blameless is silly, she is paid to make a decision, she won't always make the correct one.......
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 09-19-2015, 10:09 PM
purgatory.sv purgatory.sv is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,296
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ETOWNCANUCK View Post
This is Canada

We have a legal system
Not a justice system

And on that note were he in front of a judge not in Canada his fate most certainly would have been different at this stage of his legal matters

Kid you not
Our system is a joke and decades will pass and governing parties will come and go with nary much change.







Yes what you have said is true.

That is why fire can be good.

But only in your domain.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 09-20-2015, 06:14 AM
FishingMOM FishingMOM is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,599
Default

I still stand in my belief that the judge was stupid in giving this scumbag terrorist freedom to wander Canada and speak freely. We no longer have the ability to monitor his actions.

The US government should take him back into custody since Canada isn't holding him. He doesn't belong here. He really belongs with daddy 6 feet under.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 09-20-2015, 06:21 AM
trooper trooper is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,773
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nenaj View Post
Huh? His homeland is Canada.
Okay, than shoot him here! My solution.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 09-20-2015, 07:15 AM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,143
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nenaj View Post
Huh? His homeland is Canada.
Any Canadian that takes up arms against Canada's ally in a conflict is a traitor. As such he should have been hung or shot.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 09-20-2015, 07:48 AM
58thecat's Avatar
58thecat 58thecat is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: At the end of the Thirsty Beaver Trail, Pinsky lake, Alberta.
Posts: 24,610
Default

I prefer the raging judge as my public defender.
No court, no jury, no wasted tax payers dollars.
__________________

Be careful when you follow the masses, sometimes the "M" is silent...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.