|
02-13-2010, 12:26 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Slave Lake
Posts: 466
|
|
Berger VLD
OK so first off, please let this be a thread for factual information, not a this bullet vs that bullet, or a friend of a friend thought they sucked typical chat room as there are plenty of those out there already.
Of the people Who have actually tried them themselves, what do you think of the performance? Any pics of the actual damage done on big game? And if you have tried them in a 300wsm do you mind sharing the load information?
__________________
Horns make for poor soup.
|
02-13-2010, 06:55 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: North
Posts: 2,185
|
|
I have used them for a few years now and have killed about seven animals. All but one have been one shot kills (the one that required 2nd shot was my fault as the shot was back a little far); and ranged from 90 yards out to 450 yards with 300 WM 175 gr VLD. There wasn't much left of the bullets and all but one exited (90 yard did not exit) and all I could find was bits and pieces. There will be damaged meat if you put it in the wrong spot; if you put it in the vitals I don't think it would be any worse than any other bullet.
|
02-13-2010, 07:34 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: GP
Posts: 956
|
|
Bergers
I have used the 25 cal 115 gr Berger VLD's I was impressed at the groups that they shot. I am dissapointed in there on game performance. I hit a whitetail buck at about 165 yards right behind the shoulder, no ribs hit and the bullet still failed to exit. It was foggy and hard to see so I put 2 more in him to finish him. I have since changed to the Nosler Partition and I am super impressed how much those little bullets penetrate!
I have a few friends that use the Bergers in larger calibers, and they seem to work extremely well. I guess they just left a bad taste in my mouth.
|
02-13-2010, 09:06 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 4,658
|
|
One thing to remember with these bullets is that they are not designed to exit. They are a target bullet that happens to kill by not expanding until they are inside the animal. Once inside they expand very rapidly and generally turn the insides to a gooey mess.
The fellas that promote these bullets are almost always using that high shoulder shot that also has the shock wave bust up the spinal column as well as the vitals.
|
02-13-2010, 11:23 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 617
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowtown guy
One thing to remember with these bullets is that they are not designed to exit. They are a target bullet that happens to kill by not expanding until they are inside the animal. Once inside they expand very rapidly and generally turn the insides to a gooey mess.
The fellas that promote these bullets are almost always using that high shoulder shot that also has the shock wave bust up the spinal column as well as the vitals.
|
You are correct on what you say. I have used them on 4 deer and a elk. They all droped in there tracks Just like they say they do. or a step or two. It does not matter what bullet you use if you hit them in the right spot they will die. I like the fact that all the energy of the bullet is disipated through out the animal and not punched through with no real damadge like barnes or bullets like that(IMO).I shoot a 7mm Rum. I dont know how the other cals shoot.
|
02-14-2010, 12:47 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Slave Lake
Posts: 466
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustinC
You are correct on what you say. I have used them on 4 deer and a elk. They all droped in there tracks Just like they say they do. or a step or two. It does not matter what bullet you use if you hit them in the right spot they will die. I like the fact that all the energy of the bullet is disipated through out the animal and not punched through with no real damadge like barnes or bullets like that(IMO).I shoot a 7mm Rum. I dont know how the other cals shoot.
|
This is the reason why I'm looking at these bullets in the first place. I shot a bull moose from about 150 yards down hill this fall with a 300 wsm. I was using accubonds at the time, and the bullet went straight through, cutting the veins off the heart. Small entance, small exit. No blood trail and the bull went about 40 yards before it dropped. The berger seems to shock the animal, and the same shot with a berger should have shreaded the heart.
The penetration of a bonded bullet is not important to me, as I won't shoot unless I have a broadside shot so the benifit of a bonded bullet to me isn't that much.
__________________
Horns make for poor soup.
|
02-14-2010, 12:49 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Slave Lake
Posts: 466
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowtown guy
One thing to remember with these bullets is that they are not designed to exit. They are a target bullet that happens to kill by not expanding until they are inside the animal. Once inside they expand very rapidly and generally turn the insides to a gooey mess.
The fellas that promote these bullets are almost always using that high shoulder shot that also has the shock wave bust up the spinal column as well as the vitals.
|
Perfect. Vitals turned into a gooey mess is just what I want. I shoot for the ribs, and theres not much meat there to waste anyway.
__________________
Horns make for poor soup.
|
02-14-2010, 12:51 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 6
|
|
They work well and are accurate
|
02-14-2010, 10:07 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,253
|
|
I know you don't want to hear about anything other than bergers but if you want a good expanding bullet go with Barnes TTSX, they'll do the same thing at the speeds from your WSM but they won't explode. Just be aware that bergers are made of lead and that lead will contaminate your meat even where it doesn't appear to.
|
02-14-2010, 10:24 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 1,289
|
|
+1 my feelings exactly, shoot for the ribs and they do a better job than the rest, If your a guy who likes to take out shoulders then shoot a barnes copper rock at them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustinC
You are correct on what you say. I have used them on 4 deer and a elk. They all droped in there tracks Just like they say they do. or a step or two. It does not matter what bullet you use if you hit them in the right spot they will die. I like the fact that all the energy of the bullet is disipated through out the animal and not punched through with no real damadge like barnes or bullets like that(IMO).I shoot a 7mm Rum. I dont know how the other cals shoot.
|
And Traps as for the lead poisioning... lead bullets have been used for hundred of years in hunting and i have never herd of any hunters getting lead poisoning. Not a concern at all. You probably drink more lead in a year from your tap water than eating a dozen bullets. Lead is just fine in small quantities.
|
02-14-2010, 10:28 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: south of calgary
Posts: 1,833
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazy_fool1
+1 my feelings exactly, shoot for the ribs and they do a better job than the rest, If your a guy who likes to take out shoulders then shoot a barnes copper rock at them.
|
well said.
lee.
__________________
220swifty
1. People who list their arguments in bullets points or numerical order generally come off as condescending pecker heads.
2. #1 is true.
|
02-14-2010, 11:33 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,253
|
|
Crazyfool....you've written enough that it warrants no further comment.
|
02-18-2010, 11:56 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Cowtown
Posts: 373
|
|
I haven't used them on game yet, but will this year. I have been doing some load development with them in a .260 AI for the last few weeks and have found them(both 130gr and 140gr) to fly very well using a couple of different powders.
Here are some groups and the range was 100m prone from a bipod.
I'll be testing them soon in a 7wsm as well.
One comment I would like to make is that I'm not sure how they would work on moose. I think the fragmentation may be a good thing with a larger calibre/heavier bullet combo like a .30 cal or larger with 200gr+ bullet, but I think in a smaller calibre(.270 or under) I would want a bonded bullet.
These are just my thoughts so if someone has any other experience with the bergers on moose I'd really like to hear about it.
Ivo
|
02-18-2010, 01:45 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 494
|
|
I have been shooting them for 2 years now, both in my target rifles and in my hunting rig. Accurracy in both is very good.
My hunting rig is a 308 Norma with 168 VLDs @ 3205'/s. I have shot one Mulie and 2 white tails with this load, and they did what they were meant to do. The first White tail had small pieces pass through, the Mulie had a complete pass through, and this years White tail fragmented inside and dropped the buck where he stood. If you want a bullet that is going to give you a pass through and penetration every time, then these are not what you want. If you want a bullet that turns the insides to mush and kills just as well as other bullets these will do just that.
|
02-19-2010, 08:22 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Grande Prairie,alberta
Posts: 881
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivo
I haven't used them on game yet, but will this year. I have been doing some load development with them in a .260 AI for the last few weeks and have found them(both 130gr and 140gr) to fly very well using a couple of different powders.
Here are some groups and the range was 100m prone from a bipod.
I'll be testing them soon in a 7wsm as well.
One comment I would like to make is that I'm not sure how they would work on moose. I think the fragmentation may be a good thing with a larger calibre/heavier bullet combo like a .30 cal or larger with 200gr+ bullet, but I think in a smaller calibre(.270 or under) I would want a bonded bullet.
These are just my thoughts so if someone has any other experience with the bergers on moose I'd really like to hear about it.
Ivo
|
Some accurate loads there.
__________________
Dying to live,,,,,Living to die.....
|
02-19-2010, 09:50 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 1,289
|
|
yup u should take those loads out to 400m and see how they do.
|
02-19-2010, 10:07 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: North of Calgary
Posts: 158
|
|
210 30cal vld
Shot a deer at ~375yds that was in a group of 6 bucks, it was snowing and a little windy. When I got the scope back down on the group none of the deer had moved but the one I was shooting at had vanished. It tipped him over into the snow and he didn't move at all. The entrance was just in front of the shoulder right on the spine. The exit was big enough to put my fist in.
Plus they also shoot well out of my rifle. I've been quite happy.
|
02-22-2010, 11:49 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Slave Lake
Posts: 466
|
|
Thanks guys.
Thanks guys. I think I'm gonna give them a try. And I have the reload info from Berger if anybody wants it.
__________________
Horns make for poor soup.
|
02-23-2010, 07:46 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: High River, AB
Posts: 10,788
|
|
The best advise that I can give is to make sure that your barrel twist is sufficient and that it's at least what is recommended on the Berger web site or on the box. Otherwise, you might spend a lot of time & burn a lot of powder.
|
02-23-2010, 01:20 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Brooks
Posts: 268
|
|
Devastating hunting bullets you'll be glad that u tried them. Have had similar experiences, hard hitting and accurate. Mush internals is a very accurate statement. I dont think you would have any trouble with a moose or elk. I was unsure at first about the fragmentation and what that would do to the meat but i was pleasantly surprised. Good bullet
|
02-27-2010, 10:42 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Medicine Hat
Posts: 4,276
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Traps
I know you don't want to hear about anything other than bergers but if you want a good expanding bullet go with Barnes TTSX, they'll do the same thing at the speeds from your WSM but they won't explode. Just be aware that bergers are made of lead and that lead will contaminate your meat even where it doesn't appear to.
|
Traps the study your referring to was flawed you might want to recheck your info on that one.
6.5
__________________
Trades I would interested in:
- Sightron rifle scopes, 4.5x14x42mm or 4x16x42mm
especially! with the HHR reticle. (no duplex pls.)
- older 6x fixed scopes with fine X or target dot.
|
02-27-2010, 11:13 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,253
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6.5 shooter
Traps the study your referring to was flawed you might want to recheck your info on that one.
6.5
|
I am not quoting any study - just relying on my noggin.
|
02-27-2010, 11:20 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,076
|
|
|
02-28-2010, 12:23 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,501
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Traps
I am not quoting any study - just relying on my noggin.
|
you need to get your noggin checked if you think lead bullets are a health hazard.
|
02-28-2010, 12:27 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 492
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by whitetailhntr
you need to get your noggin checked if you think lead bullets are a health hazard.
|
Whitetailhntr,
You just set yourself up there! You want your bullet to be a health hazard... to the animal!
|
02-28-2010, 01:03 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,501
|
|
was in regards to the lead contamination comment....they are definately a health hazard to game.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:13 AM.
|