Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-02-2018, 08:35 AM
Norwest Alta Norwest Alta is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3,666
Default 35x300rum

I've made a decision that I'm gonna rebarrel my rem 700 xcr11 to a 35x300rum. Would a 26" barrel be optimal and what twist rate would I be wanting?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-02-2018, 08:51 AM
Pathfinder76 Pathfinder76 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 15,829
Default

I would go no longer than 23”.
__________________
“I love it when clients bring Berger bullets. It means I get to kill the bear.”

-Billy Molls
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-02-2018, 09:22 AM
Norwest Alta Norwest Alta is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3,666
Default

Any reason chuck?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-02-2018, 11:02 AM
Salavee Salavee is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Parkland County, AB
Posts: 4,253
Default

What application are you considering ?
__________________
When applied by competent people with the right intent, common sense goes a long way.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-02-2018, 12:24 PM
Norwest Alta Norwest Alta is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3,666
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Salavee View Post
What application are you considering ?
Near and far plain ol smacking things
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-02-2018, 02:02 PM
Soulcousin Soulcousin is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Black Dually
Posts: 259
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Norwest Alta View Post
Any reason chuck?
I'd guess that the expansion ratio of that cartridge would be a major factor. Don't need the extra barrel volume because the powder is all burnt up by then. Plus I'd be more concerned with the handling characteristics for smacking near things in brushy areas. Good luck with the build that sounds like a beast!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-02-2018, 02:05 PM
Pathfinder76 Pathfinder76 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 15,829
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soulcousin View Post
I'd guess that the expansion ratio of that cartridge would be a major factor. Don't need the extra barrel volume because the powder is all burnt up by then. Plus I'd be more concerned with the handling characteristics for smacking near things in brushy areas. Good luck with the build that sounds like a beast!
That’s pretty much it.
__________________
“I love it when clients bring Berger bullets. It means I get to kill the bear.”

-Billy Molls
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-02-2018, 02:46 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,112
Default

The resulting cartridge would be similar to the 360 Imperial Magnum which existed as part of the Imperial Magnum line of cartridges. There is some reloading data on line that should provide a good starting point. The 360 Magnum rifles were sold with 26" barrels, and they did produce enough extra velocity over the 24" test barrels, that I would go 26", if I built one.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.

Last edited by elkhunter11; 06-02-2018 at 02:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-02-2018, 03:15 PM
Salavee Salavee is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Parkland County, AB
Posts: 4,253
Default

Look up.358 UMT. Somebody's been there.
__________________
When applied by competent people with the right intent, common sense goes a long way.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-02-2018, 04:27 PM
Pathfinder76 Pathfinder76 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 15,829
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
The resulting cartridge would be similar to the 360 Imperial Magnum which existed as part of the Imperial Magnum line of cartridges. There is some reloading data on line that should provide a good starting point. The 360 Magnum rifles were sold with 26" barrels, and they did produce enough extra velocity over the 24" test barrels, that I would go 26", if I built one.
I’m curious if you have those numbers.
__________________
“I love it when clients bring Berger bullets. It means I get to kill the bear.”

-Billy Molls
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-02-2018, 04:33 PM
Stinky Coyote Stinky Coyote is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,189
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Norwest Alta View Post
I've made a decision that I'm gonna rebarrel my rem 700 xcr11 to a 35x300rum. Would a 26" barrel be optimal and what twist rate would I be wanting?
Awesome call imo
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-06-2018, 11:38 AM
Norwest Alta Norwest Alta is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3,666
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stinky Coyote View Post
Awesome call imo
Just dropped it off. Going with a 26" shillen barrel. Should be a gooder.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-06-2018, 01:03 PM
Ruby76 Ruby76 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 68
Default

What bullets are you thinking? There's a 225 accubond, 225 barnes tipped tsx. Likely wanting a 12 twist?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-06-2018, 01:40 PM
260 Rem 260 Rem is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: East Central Alberta
Posts: 8,315
Default

In most cases, there is a direct relationship between barrel length and velocity, with longer barrels producing higher velocities ... however, there is a point of diminishing benefit. It is my understanding that virtually all the powder is burned within a few inches of the chamber but the hot gas produced continues to expand, which is then then the driving force behind the bullet. Is my understanding correct?
__________________
Old Guys Rule
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-06-2018, 02:11 PM
Norwest Alta Norwest Alta is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3,666
Default

Ruby the gun Smith has built a few of them. I more or less left it to him except with the reminder that it is my money he's spending. Lol. I would like to shoot Barnes.

260 the smith said that a 26" barrel will work very well with 100grs of powder being burnt.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-06-2018, 02:25 PM
Salavee Salavee is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Parkland County, AB
Posts: 4,253
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 260 Rem View Post
In most cases, there is a direct relationship between barrel length and velocity, with longer barrels producing higher velocities ... however, there is a point of diminishing benefit. It is my understanding that virtually all the powder is burned within a few inches of the chamber but the hot gas produced continues to expand, which is then then the driving force behind the bullet. Is my understanding correct?
I believe it is peak pressure that is reached within 3-5 inches, not 100 % powder burn. Depending on the burn rate, powder continues to burn, sometimes even after the bullet has exited the barrel, but ideally, a few inches prior to exit. Immediately after peak pressure, velocity continues to increase due to the expanding gasses. After projectile acceleration decreases to a pressure equal the projectiles resistance, a rapid deceleration rate begins due primarily to barrel friction. Interestingly, in most cases, all this happens within 2 milliseconds .
__________________
When applied by competent people with the right intent, common sense goes a long way.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-06-2018, 02:58 PM
Norwest Alta Norwest Alta is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3,666
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Salavee View Post
I believe it is peak pressure that is reached within 3-5 inches, not 100 % powder burn. Depending on the burn rate, powder continues to burn, sometimes even after the bullet has exited the barrel, but ideally, a few inches prior to exit. Immediately after peak pressure, velocity continues to increase due to the expanding gasses. After projectile acceleration decreases to a pressure equal the projectiles resistance, a rapid deceleration rate begins due primarily to barrel friction. Interestingly, in most cases, all this happens within 2 milliseconds .
This is pretty much what Greg told me. Shorter barrel with that much powder would mean fire and brimstone out the end of the pipe. Longer barrel means more brimstone then fire.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-06-2018, 02:59 PM
buckbrushoutdoors's Avatar
buckbrushoutdoors buckbrushoutdoors is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fort Saskatchewan
Posts: 3,698
Default

glad you went for it, the 26'' barrel would be my choice as well.
Im shooting the 200gr ttsx in my 358STA, I wish I could find the 225gr accubond. I did find some 200gr accubonds and bought 4 boxes but haven't tried them yet.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-06-2018, 03:18 PM
JD848 JD848 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,871
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Norwest Alta View Post
Just dropped it off. Going with a 26" shillen barrel. Should be a gooder.
Bang on and good choice,you will enjoy it more than you think,best of luck.

JD
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-06-2018, 04:07 PM
Norwest Alta Norwest Alta is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3,666
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by buckbrushoutdoors View Post
glad you went for it, the 26'' barrel would be my choice as well.
Im shooting the 200gr ttsx in my 358STA, I wish I could find the 225gr accubond. I did find some 200gr accubonds and bought 4 boxes but haven't tried them yet.
If you try Corlanes they might have some. If they do the kitchen boss is heading your way next weekend she could get them to the big smoke.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 06-06-2018, 04:16 PM
Norwest Alta Norwest Alta is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3,666
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JD848 View Post
Bang on and good choice,you will enjoy it more than you think,best of luck.

JD
Thanks

It’ll be hard to give it a chance because of my ol faithful 338 wm but I’m looking forward to it. Should be done for a reasonable price as well because I told him that I’m in no hurry. Figured he might be able to find a barrel on sale if we wait. The muzzle brake I’ve got will work. He just has to open it up. Figured the xcr action shouldn’t need any blueprinting but would have to change the feed ramp angle.

Gotta decide now what I’ll use for optics. The original scope is a bushnell 6500 2.5-16 x42. I’m not a big bushnell fan. I’ve also got a minox 5-20x50 that might work fairly nice to see the fur fly.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-06-2018, 04:41 PM
260 Rem 260 Rem is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: East Central Alberta
Posts: 8,315
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Norwest Alta View Post
This is pretty much what Greg told me. Shorter barrel with that much powder would mean fire and brimstone out the end of the pipe. Longer barrel means more brimstone then fire.
With the respect due gunsmiths, I wonder if they are more in tune with knowledge related to metallurgy than chemistry?
One of the questions that plagues me with regard to the ignition of “unburned powder” causing muzzle flash ... is why it would still occur if the barrel was 6” longer (or 12” or 24”? Or, why, if a faster burning powder was substituted, there would still be a muzzle flash?
__________________
Old Guys Rule
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-06-2018, 05:06 PM
Pathfinder76 Pathfinder76 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 15,829
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Norwest Alta View Post
This is pretty much what Greg told me. Shorter barrel with that much powder would mean fire and brimstone out the end of the pipe. Longer barrel means more brimstone then fire.
Well, not really. How many 375 and 416 magnums are there out there with barrels less than 24”? Lots. That thinking is completely flawed.
__________________
“I love it when clients bring Berger bullets. It means I get to kill the bear.”

-Billy Molls
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-06-2018, 05:31 PM
Norwest Alta Norwest Alta is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3,666
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
Well, not really. How many 375 and 416 magnums are there out there with barrels less than 24”? Lots. That thinking is completely flawed.
I have no idea how many are out there. The 375 hi I had was a 28" barrel. So I know of one. I'm sure it'll shoot just fine with a 26".
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-06-2018, 05:34 PM
rem338win's Avatar
rem338win rem338win is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cowtown, agian
Posts: 2,815
Default

I would build it with a 24" and never look back. That's from speaking to more than a couolemfolks that run STA's and UMTs. Even the UMT's creator favors a 24" in his hunting gun. You'll see a maximum 60fps return on your extra 2" of barrel and even that is unlikely.

You'll be getting 3100fps on the top end of 250gr loads and over 3250 with a 225gr in a broken in 24" tube.

It's a bloody hammer and lauches low BC bullets.

To be honest I'd like to load as much RL22 as possible behind a 200gr TTSX and see how laser like that could be.
__________________
The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.
- Sir Winston Churchill

A body of men holding themselves accountable to nobody ought not to be trusted by anybody.
-Thomas Paine
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-06-2018, 05:40 PM
Norwest Alta Norwest Alta is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 3,666
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rem338win View Post
I would build it with a 24" and never look back. That's from speaking to more than a couolemfolks that run STA's and UMTs. Even the UMT's creator favors a 24" in his hunting gun. You'll see a maximum 60fps return on your extra 2" of barrel and even that is unlikely.

You'll be getting 3100fps on the top end of 250gr loads and over 3250 with a 225gr in a broken in 24" tube.

It's a bloody hammer and lauches low BC bullets.

To be honest I'd like to load as much RL22 as possible behind a 200gr TTSX and see how laser like that could be.
Road trip? Lol. I haven't seen much for reloading data. I might have to subscribe to quick load? I've never used any of the rl powder but was thinking retumbo? Seems like it's readily available.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-06-2018, 09:44 PM
marky_mark marky_mark is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,701
Default Powder

I’d be looking at h1000 also
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-07-2018, 12:31 AM
brewster29 brewster29 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: East Kootenays, BC
Posts: 1,168
Default

That is going to be a beast of a rifle! FWIW my 375 Ruger Alaskan 20" barrel is within 100 fps of 24" barrels.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 06-07-2018, 10:42 AM
buckbrushoutdoors's Avatar
buckbrushoutdoors buckbrushoutdoors is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fort Saskatchewan
Posts: 3,698
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rem338win View Post
I would build it with a 24" and never look back. That's from speaking to more than a couolemfolks that run STA's and UMTs. Even the UMT's creator favors a 24" in his hunting gun. You'll see a maximum 60fps return on your extra 2" of barrel and even that is unlikely.

You'll be getting 3100fps on the top end of 250gr loads and over 3250 with a 225gr in a broken in 24" tube.

It's a bloody hammer and lauches low BC bullets.

To be honest I'd like to load as much RL22 as possible behind a 200gr TTSX and see how laser like that could be.
that's what my load is for the STA, 91GR of rl22 and 200gr ttsx
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 06-07-2018, 10:48 AM
buckbrushoutdoors's Avatar
buckbrushoutdoors buckbrushoutdoors is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fort Saskatchewan
Posts: 3,698
Default



my oldest boy and myself got a good bear a few weeks ago with 358STA
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.