|
|
12-04-2017, 08:47 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 14
|
|
White tail supplemental season
Living in Hinton Alberta we have seen our white tail deer population all but disappear. Our Fish & Wildlife Department has, along with a large cougar population basically wiped out our white tail deer population with these ridiculous supplemental seasons in WMU 342 and 344.
It is a real surprise to see a white tail deer in either of these WMU now.
How do we convince Government to stop the killing of white tail does in these two WMU. We need a complete closure of white tail doe hunting here for at least 3 to 5 years in order to build up the population to where it once was.
Is anyone else having the same issues?
Thank you
|
12-04-2017, 09:13 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,621
|
|
I've seen the introduction of supplemental doe tags and the issuing of two MD doe tags following brutal winters that severally reduced the population.
F&W are one or two years behind in some decision making at times.
|
12-04-2017, 09:16 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,242
|
|
Deer population reductions in this area IS the plan.
__________________
Alberta Fish and Wildlife Outdoor Recreation Policy -
"to identify very rare, scarce or special forms of fish and wildlife outdoor recreation opportunities and to ensure that access to these opportunities continues to be available to all Albertans."
|
12-04-2017, 09:25 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,338
|
|
I was sent by many ppl a online petition to stop the supplemental season I'm for it
|
12-04-2017, 09:25 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 867
|
|
Dont fill them unless its youth
|
12-04-2017, 09:42 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Stony Plain
Posts: 828
|
|
If the government won't reduce or get rid of the supp tags in zones that the deer numbers are still dismal then the hunters need to wake up and do there part as well. Stop shooting all the does. Go shoot some dogs. Kill a cow elk if you want to fill the freezer.
Lots of guys who are the first to complain about deer numbers are the first to shoot 3 deer a year.
|
12-04-2017, 09:46 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,338
|
|
If ppl want a doe I have no issues with it, my issue is the guys driving around shooting a deer finding out it isn't anterless it's got 4" spikes and leaving it, past 4 years I've called in 8-9 found shot and left, that part ****es me off
|
12-04-2017, 09:56 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Cochrane
Posts: 764
|
|
This is my problem with the anti hunters, they think public opinion should dictate policy instead of science.
if your not an expert on what the carrying capacity is, then I say let the biologists do their job.
|
12-04-2017, 10:09 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Stony Plain
Posts: 828
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by openfire
This is my problem with the anti hunters, they think public opinion should dictate policy instead of science.
if your not an expert on what the carrying capacity is, then I say let the biologists do their job.
|
That is laughable.
|
12-04-2017, 10:27 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 14
|
|
Supplemental white tail tags
This is not laughable in our are and the biologists are not getting out in the woods to see the situation they have partly caused.
|
12-04-2017, 10:31 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Stony Plain
Posts: 828
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayner
This is not laughable in our are and the biologists are not getting out in the woods to see the situation they have partly caused.
|
Imagine my shock....
|
12-04-2017, 10:33 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Stony Plain
Posts: 828
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayner
This is not laughable in our are and the biologists are not getting out in the woods to see the situation they have partly caused.
|
Write a letter to Minister Shannon Phillips. Let us know if and what you hear back.
|
12-04-2017, 11:00 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,242
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayner
This is not laughable in our are and the biologists are not getting out in the woods to see the situation they have partly caused.
|
Have you spoken with the regional biologist?
Asked what the management plan is and why?
It may be enlightening, and frustrating.
__________________
Alberta Fish and Wildlife Outdoor Recreation Policy -
"to identify very rare, scarce or special forms of fish and wildlife outdoor recreation opportunities and to ensure that access to these opportunities continues to be available to all Albertans."
|
12-05-2017, 07:54 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,797
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by walking buffalo
Have you spoken with the regional biologist?
Asked what the management plan is and why?
It may be enlightening, and frustrating.
|
I am interested WB. Can you share why deer population reduction is the goal? Is it an effort to reduce predator population?
PM me if you don't want to get into a debate on a live thread. Thanks!
|
12-05-2017, 08:06 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Stony Plain
Posts: 1,835
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayner
This is not laughable in our are and the biologists are not getting out in the woods to see the situation they have partly caused.
|
The last time I put faith into the biologists in my area was when they put out the aerial survey. It was done in early January. I can't remember the numbers but the number of bulls to cows was really off. The survey showed nearly no bulls. This is the information they use to base our special license tags. Now I am not a biologist but I think I can tell you that the majority if not all the bull would have dropped their antlers by then. I was stunned by their numbers, my wmu went from 2-3 years for a bull moose draw to 10-11. This is not anywheres close to a trophy zone either. Sad really. I have beeen told that these aerial surveys are done every 5 years, so it looks like my zone will be 10-11 year priority till then. Frustrating.
As far as th supplemental does go they need to be reeled in for a few years.
|
12-05-2017, 08:17 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 90
|
|
I have land and hunt in 348 and this fall definitely saw less deer and moose than years past, and I believe my area in 348 (north part of the zone towards hwy 43) has been declining for the past few years, for what ever reason. Several of my neighbours in the area concur.
I am against the supplemental deer tags for this zone based on what I'm seeing. They are still available but myself and the neighbours have all opted not to purchase supplemental tags or shoot does.
But with that, the tags are available and it's a legal hunt so no one is breaking laws by harvesting on supplemental tags.
|
12-05-2017, 08:21 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 425
|
|
Itotally agree with WAYNOR,same thing in my area numbers way down,something has to be done soon to help numbers get back up.
__________________
Success, it's like a fart, only bothers poeple when it's not their own
|
12-05-2017, 08:24 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: edmonton
Posts: 210
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayner
Living in Hinton Alberta we have seen our white tail deer population all but disappear. Our Fish & Wildlife Department has, along with a large cougar population basically wiped out our white tail deer population with these ridiculous supplemental seasons in WMU 342 and 344.
It is a real surprise to see a white tail deer in either of these WMU now.
How do we convince Government to stop the killing of white tail does in these two WMU. We need a complete closure of white tail doe hunting here for at least 3 to 5 years in order to build up the population to where it once was.
Is anyone else having the same issues?
Thank you
|
If by "real surprise" you mean seeing 2 to 8 deer per day then yes, I agree. Unless this is one of those threads where you're trying to throw everyone off the trail of good hunting? I can never tell.
Sent from my HTC One M9 using Tapatalk
|
12-05-2017, 10:10 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,262
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bear crossing
Itotally agree with WAYNOR,same thing in my area numbers way down,something has to be done soon to help numbers get back up.
|
Once again read what WB posted. Deer population reduction is the goal. You need to talk to the regional bio and find out what the goal is and why.
The answer will surprise and frustrate you.
Long story short in those zones they want to get rid of the whitetail. Which is contrary to what many hunters want.
So the goal is working, just pizzing off hunters that want whitetail deer there.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by huntinstuff
Attention Anti Hunters
Sit back
Pour yourself a tea
Watch us "sportsmen" attack each other and destroy ourselves from within.
From road hunters vs "real hunters" to bowhunters vs rifle hunters, long bows and recurves vs compound user to bow vs crossbow to white hunters vs Native hunters etc etc etc
.....
Enjoy the easy ride, anti hunters. Strange to me why we seem to be doing your job for you.
Excuse me while I go puke.
|
|
12-05-2017, 10:44 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 9,685
|
|
Back in the day, my Northern go to WMU was loaded with WT(looking back, most likely above average numbers), some Mule deer, decent moose numbers if you got away from the roads. General tag for WT, either sex. Dad would shoot either, I a buck. No biggie. 2 deer taken each year. Then supplemental doe tags came out. Now you could take 2 does and still have a general tag. Most camps seen had only does hanging while they waited for a decent buck. Dad and I continued with our 2 deer. Well in a few seasons, we noticed the deer numbers were dropping. Can't take out that many breeders without some consequences. Then the wolves increased, followed by some brutal deep snow winters.
5 years running, numbers are still super low. Used to see many outfitter tower stands, not anymore. Even the hunter numbers dropped. I haven't even hunted there 2 yrs running now. I still sled our haunts and go where most can't before freeze up a couple times each winter, all species sign and sightings are still low.
I agree that in some WMU's, we could go back to general tag, either sex and drop the supplemental for a few years. Other zones and farmlands, all good to keep numbers in check. Each zone could use some dedicated surveys but we all know there is no cash for that.
So I assume the WT reduction has something to do with keeping another ungulate strong? I know where I hunt, the Caribou range is supposed to hit the Norther portion yet I have never seen any so far in 20 plus years. Am I correct in my assumption? The local guide I got to know well in that WMU mentioned this to me years ago.
|
12-05-2017, 10:48 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,242
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by iliketrout
I am interested WB. Can you share why deer population reduction is the goal? Is it an effort to reduce predator population?
PM me if you don't want to get into a debate on a live thread. Thanks!
|
I haven't been updated on the regional plan, hopefully Wayner will make the call as he is very concerned and wants to find a path to his desires.
But yes, WT population reduction is the goal for the purpose of starving wolves.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donkey Oatey
Once again read what WB posted. Deer population reduction is the goal. You need to talk to the regional bio and find out what the goal is and why.
The answer will surprise and frustrate you.
Long story short in those zones they want to get rid of the whitetail. Which is contrary to what many hunters want.
So the goal is working, just pizzing off hunters that want whitetail deer there.
|
What pizzes me of is the government USING hunters without being open and honest about what and why they are doing these actions.
It took some digging to reveal that biologists were purposefully using licenced hunting to reduce moose and deer populations in a vast area for the purpose of wolf control under a plan based on an unproven theory.
When I have confronted F&W regarding this management plan, asking WHY they would take such action without informing the hunting community, telling them that I thought it was a disgraceful and deceitful move, all that I ever received was silence. I think they understood and were bare'assed.
I'm pretty sure most hunters don't mind being used as a management tool, but at least be honest with us with how we are going to be used.
We have a major problem in Alberta where the regional biologists are not accountable to F&W Policy, nor to the hunting community. No public record of management status, goals, plans and concerns are offered nor required.
This situation leads to issues such as what is happening here. I hope to see this change, there are reverberations within F&W to make this happen in due course. Having concerned hunters calling their regional bio and respectfully demanding full disclosure will help.
__________________
Alberta Fish and Wildlife Outdoor Recreation Policy -
"to identify very rare, scarce or special forms of fish and wildlife outdoor recreation opportunities and to ensure that access to these opportunities continues to be available to all Albertans."
|
12-05-2017, 11:04 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: GRAND PRAIRIE
Posts: 5,720
|
|
Is there a list of biologist somewhere for Alberta thank you
Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
|
12-05-2017, 11:09 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,797
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by walking buffalo
I haven't been updated on the regional plan, hopefully Wayner will make the call as he is very concerned and wants to find a path to his desires.
But yes, WT population reduction is the goal for the purpose of starving wolves.
What pizzes me of is the government USING hunters without being open and honest about what and why they are doing these actions.
It took some digging to reveal that biologists were purposefully using licenced hunting to reduce moose and deer populations in a vast area for the purpose of wolf control under a plan based on an unproven theory.
When I have confronted F&W regarding this management plan, asking WHY they would take such action without informing the hunting community, telling them that I thought it was a disgraceful and deceitful move, all that I ever received was silence. I think they understood and were bare'assed.
I'm pretty sure most hunters don't mind being used as a management tool, but at least be honest with us with how we are going to be used.
We have a major problem in Alberta where the regional biologists are not accountable to F&W Policy, nor to the hunting community. No public record of management status, goals, plans and concerns are offered nor required.
This situation leads to issues such as what is happening here. I hope to see this change, there are reverberations within F&W to make this happen in due course. Having concerned hunters calling their regional bio and respectfully demanding full disclosure will help.
|
Thanks WB. I fully agree with your sentiments on this one.
If wolf population was the goal, I would think there are many more effective methods to do so.
|
12-05-2017, 11:15 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: NW Alberta ....
Posts: 659
|
|
contacts for Peace District
Quote:
Originally Posted by 35 whelen
Is there a list of biologist somewhere for Alberta thank you
Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
|
https://www.alberta.ca/albertaFiles/...levelID=118370
__________________
Who is John Galt?
|
12-05-2017, 12:11 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Parkland County, AB
Posts: 4,256
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dfrobert
If the government won't reduce or get rid of the supp tags in zones that the deer numbers are still dismal then the hunters need to wake up and do there part as well. Stop shooting all the does. Go shoot some dogs. Kill a cow elk if you want to fill the freezer.
Lots of guys who are the first to complain about deer numbers are the first to shoot 3 deer a year.
|
Exactly !
__________________
When applied by competent people with the right intent, common sense goes a long way.
|
12-05-2017, 12:54 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: GRAND PRAIRIE
Posts: 5,720
|
|
Thank you
Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
|
12-05-2017, 01:29 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,145
|
|
Any truth to the rumors that insurance companies are behind it to reduce wildlife collision claims?
__________________
Former Ford Fan
|
12-05-2017, 02:15 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 248
|
|
[QUOTE=crownb;3682703]The last time I put faith into the biologists in my area was when they put out the aerial survey. It was done in early January. I can't remember the numbers but the number of bulls to cows was really off. The survey showed nearly no bulls. This is the information they use to base our special license tags. Now I am not a biologist but I think I can tell you that the majority if not all the bull would have dropped their antlers by then. QUOTE]
From my observations the elk aren't dropping their antlers until April here.
|
12-05-2017, 03:56 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 116
|
|
We have this exact same problem in 236. They did a couple of huge culls then add a couple of bad winters and now the whitetail population is scarce. They should switch whitetail to draw or get rid of the season for a couple of years to give them a chance to come back. As Mule deer are a dime a dozen here.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:16 AM.
|