Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-28-2015, 05:59 PM
north american hunter's Avatar
north american hunter north american hunter is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,810
Default Scope for .35 whelen

My son has decided to 'build' a 35 whelen on a model 70 action, he is looking for a scope with a lower power for under $1000 he is thinking swaro 3-9x36 or even a leupold fxiii 6x42.

He won't be shooting over 250 yards with this rifle.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-28-2015, 06:09 PM
spyguy 0-0-7's Avatar
spyguy 0-0-7 spyguy 0-0-7 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: saskatoon
Posts: 199
Default 35 Whelen

I have a Remington 700 Classic in the 35. I have a Leupold 2x7 compact. Works great. I have no reason to have bigger glass. But to each their own.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-28-2015, 09:51 PM
north american hunter's Avatar
north american hunter north american hunter is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,810
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spyguy 0-0-7 View Post
I have a Remington 700 Classic in the 35. I have a Leupold 2x7 compact. Works great. I have no reason to have bigger glass. But to each their own.
That could be a choice.
How do you like the 700?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-29-2015, 10:08 AM
chuckster136 chuckster136 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Kelowna
Posts: 13
Default

I too have the Remington 700 Classic in 35 Whelen. For twenty years I had a Bausch & Lomb 4 X 40 mounted on it. Last year I put a Minox ZA5 1.5 X 8 on it. Why, I don't know. The 4X did everything I asked of it. Because I could I guess, too much time on my hands.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-29-2015, 12:24 PM
leo's Avatar
leo leo is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sturgeon County, Ab.
Posts: 3,131
Default

I like a fixed 4x for most guns that are intended to be used under 300 yards. Even my variables hardly ever get cranked beyond 4x. Were I to go variable I wouldn't get bigger than a 3x9.
__________________
Proper placement and Deep penetration are what’s important. Just like they taught in Sex Ed!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-29-2015, 06:22 PM
Pathfinder76 Pathfinder76 is online now
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 15,837
Default

The Leupold 1.75-6X32 is a good option. That or a fixed 4.
__________________
“I love it when clients bring Berger bullets. It means I get to kill the bear.”

-Billy Molls
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-29-2015, 06:32 PM
north american hunter's Avatar
north american hunter north american hunter is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,810
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
The Leupold 1.75-6X32 is a good option. That or a fixed 4.
He has looked at that one, do you have any experience with the 1.75-6x32?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-29-2015, 06:52 PM
Pathfinder76 Pathfinder76 is online now
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 15,837
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by north american hunter View Post
He has looked at that one, do you have any experience with the 1.75-6x32?
I do, and like it very much. The compact Leupolds are awful to look through. My favourite variables are the 3.5-10 and the 1.75-6. Here is mine (top) on my 338 Win Mag.

__________________
“I love it when clients bring Berger bullets. It means I get to kill the bear.”

-Billy Molls
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-29-2015, 06:58 PM
huntingfamily huntingfamily is online now
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 322
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by north american hunter View Post
My son has decided to 'build' a 35 whelen on a model 70 action, he is looking for a scope with a lower power for under $1000 he is thinking swaro 3-9x36 or even a leupold fxiii 6x42.

He won't be shooting over 250 yards with this rifle.
Has he considered the Leupy VX-3 in 2.5-8 x 36?
I recently mounted one on a 338-06 and think it's a good match up.




VDD Group Canada
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-29-2015, 07:09 PM
spyguy 0-0-7's Avatar
spyguy 0-0-7 spyguy 0-0-7 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: saskatoon
Posts: 199
Default 35 Whelen

Quote:
Originally Posted by north american hunter View Post
That could be a choice.
How do you like the 700?
I love the Whelen. I reload with 250 gr Hornady using 59gr's of BLC-2. If I do my job he rifle shoots 3/4" or less. I've never had to shoot a 2nd round at a moose.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-29-2015, 07:14 PM
north american hunter's Avatar
north american hunter north american hunter is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,810
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
I do, and like it very much. The compact Leupolds are awful to look through. My favourite variables are the 3.5-10 and the 1.75-6. Here is mine (top) on my 338 Win Mag.

It's definitely an option, he like his eye relief he's looking at fix 6x42
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-29-2015, 07:17 PM
eric2381 eric2381 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,484
Default

I have an older Zeiss Diavari 3-9x36 on my custom 98 Mauser 35 whelen and love it.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-29-2015, 07:53 PM
sillyak sillyak is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lacombe, AB
Posts: 1,404
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by north american hunter View Post
It's definitely an option, he like his eye relief he's looking at fix 6x42
If he likes eye relief and is fine with a fixed power scope the FX II 6x36mm may be a better option. Although it has slightly less eye relief than the 42mm it actually has more if ring placement is the limiting factor because of the scope measurements. I have one on my Ruger No. 1 300 H&H. Because of how the rings are positioned on No. 1s and some long action rifles the dimensions of the scope itself also play a factor in how comfortable your sight picture is through the scope. This is why the 36mm has effectively more eye relief (as in it gives a better sight picture on some rifles) than the 42mm despite technically having less.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-29-2015, 09:05 PM
duceman duceman is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: south of calgary
Posts: 1,831
Default

nailed it with the 6x42, lee
__________________
220swifty

1. People who list their arguments in bullets points or numerical order generally come off as condescending pecker heads.

2. #1 is true.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-30-2015, 02:46 PM
SuperCub's Avatar
SuperCub SuperCub is offline
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: SJ, NB
Posts: 410
Default

I've used Leupold VXIII 1.5x5, FXII 4x and 2.5x8 on different 35Whelens (& 358Win) over the years.

I like to keep scopes lightweight and lower powered in low rings as close to the bore as possible, esp on a gun like that. I have not found a need for more magnification.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-31-2015, 08:25 AM
tony d tony d is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 279
Default

Back when I had a 700 rem in 35 Whelen I used a straight 6x and was happy with that so I vote for the 6x42
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-02-2015, 08:08 PM
a.schultz a.schultz is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 8
Default

I've used a Swaro Habicht in 3-9x36mm on my .375 H&H and on a custom 7mm-08. Great scope, super clear and light weight if you are looking to shed a few ounces on your rifle.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.