|
01-28-2015, 05:59 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,810
|
|
Scope for .35 whelen
My son has decided to 'build' a 35 whelen on a model 70 action, he is looking for a scope with a lower power for under $1000 he is thinking swaro 3-9x36 or even a leupold fxiii 6x42.
He won't be shooting over 250 yards with this rifle.
|
01-28-2015, 06:09 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: saskatoon
Posts: 199
|
|
35 Whelen
I have a Remington 700 Classic in the 35. I have a Leupold 2x7 compact. Works great. I have no reason to have bigger glass. But to each their own.
|
01-28-2015, 09:51 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,810
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spyguy 0-0-7
I have a Remington 700 Classic in the 35. I have a Leupold 2x7 compact. Works great. I have no reason to have bigger glass. But to each their own.
|
That could be a choice.
How do you like the 700?
|
01-29-2015, 10:08 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Kelowna
Posts: 13
|
|
I too have the Remington 700 Classic in 35 Whelen. For twenty years I had a Bausch & Lomb 4 X 40 mounted on it. Last year I put a Minox ZA5 1.5 X 8 on it. Why, I don't know. The 4X did everything I asked of it. Because I could I guess, too much time on my hands.
|
01-29-2015, 12:24 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sturgeon County, Ab.
Posts: 3,131
|
|
I like a fixed 4x for most guns that are intended to be used under 300 yards. Even my variables hardly ever get cranked beyond 4x. Were I to go variable I wouldn't get bigger than a 3x9.
__________________
Proper placement and Deep penetration are what’s important. Just like they taught in Sex Ed!
|
01-29-2015, 06:22 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 15,837
|
|
The Leupold 1.75-6X32 is a good option. That or a fixed 4.
__________________
“I love it when clients bring Berger bullets. It means I get to kill the bear.”
-Billy Molls
|
01-29-2015, 06:32 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,810
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck
The Leupold 1.75-6X32 is a good option. That or a fixed 4.
|
He has looked at that one, do you have any experience with the 1.75-6x32?
|
01-29-2015, 06:52 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 15,837
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by north american hunter
He has looked at that one, do you have any experience with the 1.75-6x32?
|
I do, and like it very much. The compact Leupolds are awful to look through. My favourite variables are the 3.5-10 and the 1.75-6. Here is mine (top) on my 338 Win Mag.
__________________
“I love it when clients bring Berger bullets. It means I get to kill the bear.”
-Billy Molls
|
01-29-2015, 06:58 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 322
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by north american hunter
My son has decided to 'build' a 35 whelen on a model 70 action, he is looking for a scope with a lower power for under $1000 he is thinking swaro 3-9x36 or even a leupold fxiii 6x42.
He won't be shooting over 250 yards with this rifle.
|
Has he considered the Leupy VX-3 in 2.5-8 x 36?
I recently mounted one on a 338-06 and think it's a good match up.
VDD Group Canada
|
01-29-2015, 07:09 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: saskatoon
Posts: 199
|
|
35 Whelen
Quote:
Originally Posted by north american hunter
That could be a choice.
How do you like the 700?
|
I love the Whelen. I reload with 250 gr Hornady using 59gr's of BLC-2. If I do my job he rifle shoots 3/4" or less. I've never had to shoot a 2nd round at a moose.
|
01-29-2015, 07:14 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,810
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck
I do, and like it very much. The compact Leupolds are awful to look through. My favourite variables are the 3.5-10 and the 1.75-6. Here is mine (top) on my 338 Win Mag.
|
It's definitely an option, he like his eye relief he's looking at fix 6x42
|
01-29-2015, 07:17 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,484
|
|
I have an older Zeiss Diavari 3-9x36 on my custom 98 Mauser 35 whelen and love it.
|
01-29-2015, 07:53 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lacombe, AB
Posts: 1,404
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by north american hunter
It's definitely an option, he like his eye relief he's looking at fix 6x42
|
If he likes eye relief and is fine with a fixed power scope the FX II 6x36mm may be a better option. Although it has slightly less eye relief than the 42mm it actually has more if ring placement is the limiting factor because of the scope measurements. I have one on my Ruger No. 1 300 H&H. Because of how the rings are positioned on No. 1s and some long action rifles the dimensions of the scope itself also play a factor in how comfortable your sight picture is through the scope. This is why the 36mm has effectively more eye relief (as in it gives a better sight picture on some rifles) than the 42mm despite technically having less.
|
01-29-2015, 09:05 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: south of calgary
Posts: 1,831
|
|
nailed it with the 6x42, lee
__________________
220swifty
1. People who list their arguments in bullets points or numerical order generally come off as condescending pecker heads.
2. #1 is true.
|
01-30-2015, 02:46 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2014
Location: SJ, NB
Posts: 410
|
|
I've used Leupold VXIII 1.5x5, FXII 4x and 2.5x8 on different 35Whelens (& 358Win) over the years.
I like to keep scopes lightweight and lower powered in low rings as close to the bore as possible, esp on a gun like that. I have not found a need for more magnification.
|
01-31-2015, 08:25 AM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 279
|
|
Back when I had a 700 rem in 35 Whelen I used a straight 6x and was happy with that so I vote for the 6x42
|
02-02-2015, 08:08 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 8
|
|
I've used a Swaro Habicht in 3-9x36mm on my .375 H&H and on a custom 7mm-08. Great scope, super clear and light weight if you are looking to shed a few ounces on your rifle.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:31 AM.
|