Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

View Poll Results: Which caliber?
300WSM 22 24.72%
300WM 28 31.46%
338WM 25 28.09%
375 H&H 14 15.73%
Voters: 89. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-25-2010, 09:50 AM
Marlin xl7's Avatar
Marlin xl7 Marlin xl7 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Coalhurst,Alberta
Posts: 657
Default Cartridge help.

This is stemming off of my other thread, some of the suggestions have really got me thinking. Please vote for which caliber you think is best for bears, moose, elk.
And if you choose the 338 WM or 375 H&H please tell me what you think the recoil is like.
__________________
I can get out of a tight spot better than Macgyver with a paperclip

Last edited by Marlin xl7; 12-25-2010 at 09:58 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-25-2010, 09:57 AM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 44,842
Default

First of all,the 338win and 375H&H are cartridges,not calibers.As for choosing a specific cartridge,that depends on how well you deal with recoil.I could be content hunting those animals with any cartridge from the 7mm-08 on up to the 300RUM,but many people have issues dealing with the recoil of the 300 magnums.I don't see a need for the 338s on up unless I am hunting grizzly,and there is no grizzly season in Alberta.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-25-2010, 03:11 PM
leo's Avatar
leo leo is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sturgeon County, Ab.
Posts: 3,126
Default

If you are looking for 1 cartridge to cover "all" North American game 338wm would be my first choice, followed by any of the 300 magnums. I have in the cupboard right now 1- 338, 3 different 300 magnums. With proper firearm fit and good recoil pads all are tolerable to shoot. But they are all in the 8 1/2 - 9 lb range as well w/ scope and loaded magazine , sling etc. The beauty of becoming a hunter and to some degree a gun nut is the choices available . All calibers are usefull for specific tasks, and a few can multi task very well. To all first gun buyers.... stick with conventional chamberings (7-08 through 30-06). Leave the magnum chambering for your next firearm until you are proficient with a non magnum round. JMO
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-25-2010, 03:26 PM
rem338win's Avatar
rem338win rem338win is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cowtown, agian
Posts: 2,812
Default

I voted for the .338, and to answer your question: the recoil is manageable in an 8lb rifle, but it is fast and 20 rounds can start to fatigue a person. That being said a 225gr bullet at 2800fps is where I personally have started to see any difference in on game performance that is noticeably better than the 130-180gr crowd out of the .270-300 cartridges. It would be my "one gun for the world" pick. Yes, even for elephants and such.

Last edited by rem338win; 12-25-2010 at 03:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-25-2010, 05:10 PM
Marlin xl7's Avatar
Marlin xl7 Marlin xl7 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Coalhurst,Alberta
Posts: 657
Default

Well right now I have a 270, shoot it very easily. I can shoot my dads 8 pound 30-06 with some fairly hot 165gr handloads easily. I just want something different.
__________________
I can get out of a tight spot better than Macgyver with a paperclip
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-25-2010, 06:09 PM
gitrdun gitrdun is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: High River, AB
Posts: 10,788
Default

I've hunted the Yukon and brought both my .375 H&H and my .338WM for moose. Got tired of 7 days in a boat and travelled dry land for a while. I came upon a grizzly sow at 75 yds. All alone with my .375 and I'll admit to goose bumps on my arms and back. That .375 although extremely capable didn't make me feel any better, as I figured that if she charged, I still had the job of making the shot. The picture that follows was taken with my cell phone at less than 50 yds. At the time, I was riding the cattle range, my .444Marlin was in the scabbard. I knew that there was no way on God's green earth that I could draw it out fast enough to make a real difference. Best I could do was to pray that my paint mare wouldn't loose it. Tippy toes in the stirrups, I made it out OK. But I'll say that any caliber would not have gotten me out this situation had those two brothers not had a full belly. As a side note, my mare gained a lot of respect from me. And no, I didn't vote, 'cause with a grizz close encounter such as this one, caliber is not an option, not at 50 yds. Pee in your pants is a given.

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-25-2010, 06:24 PM
gitrdun gitrdun is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: High River, AB
Posts: 10,788
Default

And this is the heroic paint mare that carried me out of this ordeal. Joe Joe was her name. I never forgot that she didn't dump me. In fact, she spotted the grizz's long before I did. I bought her for $1200.00, but after this close encounter and her level headed behaviour, she was worth more to me than a blank cheque.

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-25-2010, 06:27 PM
demolition101 demolition101 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Just North West of Edmonton
Posts: 659
Default

.308
__________________
I dont care how fast you can run...

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-25-2010, 09:38 PM
Pudelpointer Pudelpointer is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Back in Lethbridge
Posts: 4,647
Default

Depending on how well you deal with recoil, the 375 can be considered somewhere between manageable and brutal. With the bigger cartridges, rifle fit becomes much more critical to how recoil is transferred to the shooter.

FWIW, I believe the 338 is probably the best rifle for the bigger varieties of big game in NA (moose, elk, bison, bears), even more so while wandering through grizz country. However, I chose the 375, cause you really can't have too much gun.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-25-2010, 09:43 PM
sheephunter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Why is there no all of the above option?

Difference betweem the WSM and WM is a wash. For many reasons the 338 is likely a better caliber than the 375 but there is something so cool about the 375 H&H. No collection is complete without all three.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-25-2010, 10:48 PM
KegRiver's Avatar
KegRiver KegRiver is offline
Gone Hunting
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: North of Peace River
Posts: 11,346
Default

I use a 30-30 for Moose and Bear, I've never hunted or shot an Elk.

More Moose and Bear are killed with 30-30s then any other caliber, at least in this Provence.

Why isn't 30-30 on you list?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-25-2010, 10:53 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 44,842
Default

Quote:
More Moose and Bear are killed with 30-30s then any other caliber, at least in this Provence.
If you mean more moose and bear are killed with the 30-30 cartridge than with any other cartridge,I challenge you to produce data that proves this to be true.

If you mean any other caliber,the 30-30 is not a caliber,but it shoots .308" bullets,just like the 308win,30-06,300wsm,300winmag and many more cartridges,so it is possible that more bear or moose are killed with .308" bullets than with any other caliber.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-25-2010, 10:55 PM
3Dshooter 3Dshooter is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 492
Default

I would choose the .338 Win. My first rifle was (is) a .338 Winchester that I've been hunting with since I was 15 years old. That was 26 years ago. I have 2 at the moment and a .375 H&H as well. They're all great, I carry all 3, depending on what I'm doing. They all have a purpose and wouldn't part with any of them. The .375 has the greatest felt recoil for sure, but it's definitely due to stock design as well as pushing a heavier bullet.
__________________
Fernie Rod & Gun Club, log on to;

http://www.ferniergc.com/
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-25-2010, 11:06 PM
BallCoeff.435 BallCoeff.435 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: God's Country
Posts: 749
Default

338x250gnx2900fps in a 12-pound rig. That's a lot of juice at 50 yards for any irritated creature. Lots of punch out to 500 yards, controllable, nice and flat shooting too. No need for 375HH.

Caveat - I don't go out of my way to get close up and personal with grizzlies/brown bears, African cats, vindictive cape buffalo, etc etc. If I wanted to get something silly I would probably bypass the 375 and go directly to a 408 Cheytac, 458 Lott, or 50BMG. Kinda hard to swing a 50 around quickly in heavy bush though.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-25-2010, 11:26 PM
wwbirds's Avatar
wwbirds wwbirds is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: near Calgary
Posts: 6,638
Default None of the above

Keep it simple and get a 30-06, cheap readily available ammo and the calibre will kill anything in North America, very versatile in bullet weights available if you reload or plan on it.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-25-2010, 11:33 PM
wwbirds's Avatar
wwbirds wwbirds is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: near Calgary
Posts: 6,638
Default gitrdun

Gord at Willow Creek rode a fairly green horse in the valley while cutting lumber in 2009 when he noticed something under a tree. Rode up and two grizz cubs and momma was right beside him running along instantly. Green horse kept it together so it was not the size of the calibre but the horse that stays calm and gets you out of harms way that counts.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-26-2010, 12:15 AM
Windago Windago is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: sick and tired of bs
Posts: 141
Default w.t.f.

The picture that follows was taken with my cell phone at less than 50 yds. At the time, I was riding the cattle range, my .444Marlin was in the scabbard.

so you had time to take a photo but not to get your .444 out
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-26-2010, 12:15 AM
rottie's Avatar
rottie rottie is online now
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lacombe
Posts: 2,462
Default

I shoot a .375 in a custom shop Rem 700 and love it. Do I need it in Alberta ? Absolutly not, but its a fun gun to shoot,doesnt recoil too bad and spits a 235 grain slug out at 2980 fps so it shoots fairly flat out to 300 yards or so.

The down side is its a bit heavey for hiking hills but for bush or flat country its fine

Ian
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-27-2010, 06:29 PM
gitrdun gitrdun is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: High River, AB
Posts: 10,788
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Windago View Post
The picture that follows was taken with my cell phone at less than 50 yds. At the time, I was riding the cattle range, my .444Marlin was in the scabbard.

so you had time to take a photo but not to get your .444 out
Absolutely. The cell phone was in my shirt pocket. The .444 was in my scabbard which has a folder over flap that covers the buttstock and is laced up. My best defense was to get my mare into a gallop and make a mile between myself and the bears. In order to do that, I need one hand on the saddle horn and one on the reins. Bad planning on my part? most certainly, I had I not planned on this encounter, which occured in WMU312 bordering WMY406. The location which I've ridden for years isn't prone to grizz encounters. I was simply and casually riding the range to doctor up cows and check fences between the forestry and the grazing lease for my rancher neighbour and friend. The reason that my .444 was in the scabbard and laced up was that I may need it to put a bull down that had been reported as having a broken leg. Perhaps if you had spent as many days in the saddle as I have, you might hold off on the "d'oh" imoticon?

Last edited by gitrdun; 12-27-2010 at 06:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-27-2010, 06:45 PM
gitrdun gitrdun is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: High River, AB
Posts: 10,788
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wwbirds View Post
Gord at Willow Creek rode a fairly green horse in the valley while cutting lumber in 2009 when he noticed something under a tree. Rode up and two grizz cubs and momma was right beside him running along instantly. Green horse kept it together so it was not the size of the calibre but the horse that stays calm and gets you out of harms way that counts.
For sure ww, you got it. You simply can't train that into a horse, either they got it or they don't. Problem is....you can't tell until it happens. Well maybe not, I've rode up that mare to a fresh elk kill with no problem. My pack horse wouldn't have nothing to do with it. Well, that was until I dabbed the inside of his nostrils with Vicks Vapourub. Hah! worked.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 12-27-2010, 06:56 PM
catnthehat's Avatar
catnthehat catnthehat is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,530
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gitrdun View Post
For sure ww, you got it. You simply can't train that into a horse, either they got it or they don't. Problem is....you can't tell until it happens. Well maybe not, I've rode up that mare to a fresh elk kill with no problem. My pack horse wouldn't have nothing to do with it. Well, that was until I dabbed the inside of his nostrils with Vicks Vapourub. Hah! worked.
I have spent a "few hours " in the saddle in my younger days, and a good horse will get you out of more scrapes than you can shake a stick at!
I had a buddy downriver who swore by his little bush ponies - the danged things were half mule I think when it came to dealing with things like wolves and bears!
I also know that when things happen quick you had better have a deep seat, but keep a hand on the horn for sure - a good horse will know what to do in once you turn him and give him his head!! :>)
You are right on, gitrdun, I'd go for a good horse before a big gun any day!:>)
Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-27-2010, 10:10 PM
Pudelpointer Pudelpointer is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Back in Lethbridge
Posts: 4,647
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BallCoeff.435 View Post
338x250gnx2900fps in a 12-pound rig. That's a lot of juice at 50 yards for any irritated creature. Lots of punch out to 500 yards, controllable, nice and flat shooting too. No need for 375HH.
Sorry BC, but in what world are you driving a 250 out of a 338 win at 2950? Most 338 Lapua 250 gr loads are in the 2850-2900 range. I can not imagine the pressure you would need to run a WinMag at to hit 2950.

Seriously.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-28-2010, 03:07 PM
BallCoeff.435 BallCoeff.435 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: God's Country
Posts: 749
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pudelpointer View Post
Sorry BC, but in what world are you driving a 250 out of a 338 win at 2950? Most 338 Lapua 250 gr loads are in the 2850-2900 range. I can not imagine the pressure you would need to run a WinMag at to hit 2950.

Seriously.
'K. That's a chronographed factory load out of a Wby case (which indeed has similar ballistics to the LM). Have actually had them up to 3109fps using 90gn of IMR7828 SSC on a nice spring day. Casings got a tad sloppy after that. Rifle's been rebuilt since then; wouldn't try that now.

Last edited by BallCoeff.435; 12-28-2010 at 03:14 PM. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-29-2010, 12:18 PM
Dean2's Avatar
Dean2 Dean2 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Near Edmonton
Posts: 14,973
Default

If you have a 270 and an 06, to me the obvious choice for something differnet would be the 375. If it is just for fun, they really are that, from 245 grain cast loads at 1500 fps to 270 grain TSX at 2700 fps, they are a great toy with lots of fun factor.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-29-2010, 03:22 PM
mudbug's Avatar
mudbug mudbug is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: 3rd rock from the sun, formerly from 4th rock from the sun
Posts: 5,000
Smile

I'm surprised no one has mentioned a Marlin Guide Gun in 45-70 using hand loads

30-06 is a good all round one as well many others that aren't listed
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-29-2010, 04:03 PM
fish_e_o fish_e_o is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: rollyview
Posts: 7,860
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mudbug View Post
I'm surprised no one has mentioned a Marlin Guide Gun in 45-70 using hand loads
that's mine... 350 gr hornady pushed by imr 4198 is a pretty good mix

excellent with iron sights to 100 yards maybe beyond that if you're confident and even further with optics (although it looks goofy)
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-29-2010, 06:31 PM
nanuk-O-dah-Nort nanuk-O-dah-Nort is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Rural Central Saskatchewan
Posts: 545
Default I went with 338

I've never fired a 300WSM or a 375HH

but have fired a 300WinMag and owned a 338WinMag for awhile.
a Ruger 77MK2 and it was easier to shoot well than the 300WinMag I had.
Lots of barrel of good diameter out in front made the difference I think.

because you included bears, I would not consider any 30cal.

Like Giterdun sez, big 'uns like those in the picture would also make me leave a wet spot.

for Moose and Elk, a 338 can penetrate and kill very effectively. and to me penetration is the key. if a 375 recoil is in the same category, I'd choose that.

that is just me, I like to make sure I leave a good blood trail from the exit wound.

my 338, with 230gr failsafe, penetrated about 5-6 ft of moose starting at the back, ending up in the lungs some where. broken hip, broken back, and coughing copious amounts of blood. That was the blood trail I followed.

I am not sure I would have taken the shot with a 30cal.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-29-2010, 06:41 PM
MattSako's Avatar
MattSako MattSako is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 661
Default

375 H&H is awesome... I do not listen to most peoples who says its overkill or have a bad recoil.. such as the common story of the 300 pound man who is scared of the recoil of a 375.

My hunter ethic tells me that id rather have a caliber who kill the animal 1 shot in its track than a caliber who make the animal suffer for a while. I do own a 30-06.. and i will never bring it back to hunting. Sure a well placed shot kill with all the caliber... but how many caliber can claim to kill everytime with a single shot... ?

Plus the recoil now is rediculous to even talk about with the several muzzle brake and supressor offered for the hunters who are scared of their rifle..
A side note about recoil is.. dont expect a cheap rifle at 500$ to kick like an awesome 2000$ Sako etc.. its just impossible.. there is quality and weight to consider..

Now to answer the Question.. my answer is : a Sako in caliber 375 H&H " 8.5lb " kick very fast but very very smooth...

My Dad 375 H&H Browning. 27 inch barrel Kick a bit more than a Sako.

My uncle 375 H&H Ruger n'1 kick a lot more. Ruger firearms kick a lot.. all of em does.

I tried em all and im 156 lb and i can shoot a 20 shot box with all of em without my shoulder to feel any pain. But Sako come over the top with the less felt recoil.

Oh and id love to see some comments on the fact that a 338 win mag actually have a bad recoil compared to a 375 h&h... ive heard its terrible.. never tried that caliber and i do own a .338 Lapua and its also very very smooth.... No i do not have a muzzle brake... Makes no sense to use 1 unless you want to buy a 4000 $ caliber and feel like your shooting a 300 $ .22 LRF.. rofl.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12-29-2010, 06:57 PM
MattSako's Avatar
MattSako MattSako is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 661
Smile

Id love to include in my comment even if most peoples already know the fact.

A 300 wsm is a better version of the classic 300 Win mag ( Better velocity, flatter trajectory etc ) It is the Top of the 4th rifle you listed for LONG RANGE. ( Some peoples says barrel life is not as good as a 300 win mag..??? )

300 win mag come 2nd For Long Range and power.

338 Win mag have better punch than a 300 win mag but for Medium Range shot... 300 win mag will beat a 338 when shooting 400 yards +...

Now the classic 375 h&h.. probably my favorite... Most peoples says its only good for up to 250 yards... i think its true... a 89 $ box of 260gr nosler accubon will give a better chance to reach further with better punch than a 270 or 300... But it is not the best rifle for a Long Range shot....

For close range id take a 375 Anytime.. For a long shot.. 300 WSM.


PS * If you have the money.. buy the real All around rifle.. .338 Lapua Magnum.. *

Last edited by MattSako; 12-29-2010 at 07:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 12-29-2010, 07:05 PM
DOGFISH's Avatar
DOGFISH DOGFISH is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Fort Saskatchewan
Posts: 730
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by leo View Post
If you are looking for 1 cartridge to cover "all" North American game 338wm would be my first choice, followed by any of the 300 magnums. I have in the cupboard right now 1- 338, 3 different 300 magnums. With proper firearm fit and good recoil pads all are tolerable to shoot. But they are all in the 8 1/2 - 9 lb range as well w/ scope and loaded magazine , sling etc. The beauty of becoming a hunter and to some degree a gun nut is the choices available . All calibers are usefull for specific tasks, and a few can multi task very well. To all first gun buyers.... stick with conventional chamberings (7-08 through 30-06). Leave the magnum chambering for your next firearm until you are proficient with a non magnum round. JMO
Well put Leo.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.