Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #121  
Old 01-07-2014, 11:32 AM
AI 6.5 AI 6.5 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Edmonton/San Tan Valley,Arizona
Posts: 805
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackpheasant View Post
If Greasy LOu gets in its because he's greasing more than just his hair with that stuff
I am not a die hard hockey fan so who in the hell is "greasy Lou"?
Reply With Quote
  #122  
Old 01-07-2014, 11:44 AM
brownbomber's Avatar
brownbomber brownbomber is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: flms
Posts: 3,911
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhutter View Post
I agree. I would've liked to have seen Giroux over Nash but at the end of the day (or tournament), it doesn't really matter. Can't say that the difference between gold and bronze or what have you depends on one player making or not making the team.

I also don't think a ton of Hamhuis but again, it doesn't really matter.

Canada's second team.

Hall-Giroux-St. Louis
Couture-Thornton-Eberle
Skinner-Staal-Neal
Lucic-Seguin-Iginla

Campbell-Seabrook
Giordano-Staal
Methot-Letang
Phaneuf-Boyle

Crawford
Fleury
Harding

Haha, good for a second place finish.
Yup depending on the draw semis for sure lol
__________________
the days we are at our best we can play with anybody, problem is those days are getting farther and farther apart
Reply With Quote
  #123  
Old 01-07-2014, 12:00 PM
Rod1960's Avatar
Rod1960 Rod1960 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,969
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AI 6.5 View Post
I am not a die hard hockey fan so who in the hell is "greasy Lou"?
Roberto Luongo
__________________
In my world stock options and group therapy means something completely different!

'Never trust anyone who says you can't legally own something because they don't like it'. - Me
Reply With Quote
  #124  
Old 01-07-2014, 12:31 PM
artie artie is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,940
Default

so how come no Calgary Flames made the team or do we have a team?
Reply With Quote
  #125  
Old 01-07-2014, 01:20 PM
wags's Avatar
wags wags is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 2,387
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Okotokian View Post
Glad you laughed before that, otherwise I might have thought you were serious. No way that team medals.
I'd take that bet!

Always a good debate on when the roster is announced. I think Nash got on due to experience, and how he always steps up in international play for Canada. I feel bad for St. Louis - I thought he deserved a spot.

GO CANADA!

Cheers
__________________
~Men and fish are alike. They both get into trouble when they open their mouths.~
Reply With Quote
  #126  
Old 01-07-2014, 01:25 PM
DiabeticKripple's Avatar
DiabeticKripple DiabeticKripple is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Blackfalds
Posts: 6,952
Default

another huge surprise is how Hudler isnt on the czech team.

he is 3rd in scoring in the NHL for czechs and he is doing it on the flames....

they put Cervenka on but not Hudler. doesnt make sense
__________________
Trudeau and Biden sit to pee
Reply With Quote
  #127  
Old 01-07-2014, 03:08 PM
JRsMav JRsMav is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 514
Default

Couple of surprises but the team looks solid. Goal was a no brainer with the exception of mike smith, I guess. 3rd goalie really doesn't matter though.
Reply With Quote
  #128  
Old 01-07-2014, 04:18 PM
chadyaz's Avatar
chadyaz chadyaz is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 689
Default

Its a good enough roster to win gold. If they don't win, its not because Nash is there instead of St. Louis. Or Hamhuis instead of Seabrook, etc, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #129  
Old 01-07-2014, 05:00 PM
TBark's Avatar
TBark TBark is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Fort Sask, AB
Posts: 4,924
Default

Ya, for Flames fans.
Hudler instead of Nedved for sure on team CZK.

TBark
Reply With Quote
  #130  
Old 01-07-2014, 06:24 PM
brownbomber's Avatar
brownbomber brownbomber is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: flms
Posts: 3,911
Default

There must have been many close calls. Lotta really good players to pick from. Hope it's the right combination.
__________________
the days we are at our best we can play with anybody, problem is those days are getting farther and farther apart
Reply With Quote
  #131  
Old 01-07-2014, 08:19 PM
kinwahkly kinwahkly is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: calagry
Posts: 1,925
Default

Giordano from the Flames should have been named,
Reply With Quote
  #132  
Old 01-07-2014, 08:23 PM
gman1978 gman1978 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kinwahkly View Post
Giordano from the Flames should have been named,
You are not serious.....are you.
Reply With Quote
  #133  
Old 01-07-2014, 09:58 PM
pinelakeperch's Avatar
pinelakeperch pinelakeperch is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Alberta
Posts: 2,445
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Okotokian View Post
Glad you laughed before that, otherwise I might have thought you were serious. No way that team medals.
I was being serious. There are only 2 deeper teams than that team, and one is Team Canada. Looking at the rosters again, I take that back. They're only second to Team Canada. Sweden would be close but like the Russians, after the top lines the talent thins out. The second Canadian team is deep through four lines. Goaltending could be an issue.
Reply With Quote
  #134  
Old 01-07-2014, 10:43 PM
blackpheasant's Avatar
blackpheasant blackpheasant is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 4,257
Default

Can't believe how big this team is 6' 2" avg....big doesn't mean slow either, I actually like Marleau on this team he's awesome on the big ice he can fly, Bouwmeester same thing, this could be the best team Canada has ever put together, great coach too
Reply With Quote
  #135  
Old 01-07-2014, 11:09 PM
Burglecut83 Burglecut83 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,003
Default

I hope they play hard and mean. Give em hell and take the gold.
Take Canada to the top of hockey supremacy. Wooooooooooo
Go Canada I hope Stamkos is healthy as well.
Reply With Quote
  #136  
Old 01-07-2014, 11:27 PM
brownbomber's Avatar
brownbomber brownbomber is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: flms
Posts: 3,911
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhutter View Post
I was being serious. There are only 2 deeper teams than that team, and one is Team Canada. Looking at the rosters again, I take that back. They're only second to Team Canada. Sweden would be close but like the Russians, after the top lines the talent thins out. The second Canadian team is deep through four lines. Goaltending could be an issue.
That's what I see as well, lots of other possibilities as well. Like I said semis maybe quarter final loss to a top team. I would go canada, Sweden, Russia and pretty close between us and canada 2 for the last spot in the final four, pretty even between those two with canada 2 goaltending and USA defence. But like anything there's always the possibility of a run. Slovakia in 2010 played really well as a team, Swiss at the last world championship made the final, Finland doesn't have the talent but they always have the heart and drive. Who knows right.
__________________
the days we are at our best we can play with anybody, problem is those days are getting farther and farther apart
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.