Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Hunting Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-29-2012, 09:52 PM
roar roar is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: calgary
Posts: 48
Default Range Finders ?????

Interested in buying a range finder was wondering what everyone is using don't want to spend alot of $$$. I know the more $$$ you spend the better quality and product you will get. would like some info brand names,cost, pros and cons. thanks in advance for any and all info.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-29-2012, 10:04 PM
BackPackHunter BackPackHunter is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,345
Default

Im using the new EL ranges... they r the best range finder i have ever used...
but bang for buck... my buddy has
http://www.ebay.ca/itm/Leupold-11218...#ht_1622wt_910

they work really good for the price...
almost as good as the Leica i just had, but with less options build in
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-29-2012, 11:21 PM
dadof5 dadof5 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 855
Default

Leupold RX 1000 is great. Whatever you do, ensure the readout is in RED, cuz the black readout is tough to se in poor light conditions.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-30-2012, 07:47 AM
singleshotom's Avatar
singleshotom singleshotom is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 452
Default Range finder

Vectronix Terrapin rangefinder is the best Ive ever used. Their expensive but they are as good as advertised. If your like me and bought many different ones and feel like you've been cheated I think your better off to just save your money and buy really good ones.
Especially for long range shooting.
sst
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-30-2012, 09:02 AM
Lefty-Canuck's Avatar
Lefty-Canuck Lefty-Canuck is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Look behind you :)
Posts: 27,780
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by singleshotom View Post
Vectronix Terrapin rangefinder is the best Ive ever used. Their expensive but they are as good as advertised. If your like me and bought many different ones and feel like you've been cheated I think your better off to just save your money and buy really good ones.Especially for long range shooting.
sst
I can relate to this.....bought 2 bushnells, strangely enough the oldest 1st one I bought was the better of the 2 but really large. The second one has the black display and it won't range past 300 yards. I got a nice bonus cheque one year so I picked up a set of Geovids.

LC
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-30-2012, 09:10 AM
bpoppa85 bpoppa85 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 180
Default

Picked up the leupold rx-1000i rangefinder. Awesome!! The optics are crystal clear. The red readout is a must, in the bright day light can read it perfectly clear, and at night you can turn it to low and it isn't overpowering. Gives you holdover bases on your ballistics, and has a bow mode out to 120 yards. The only thing i was concerned with was the price. Cabelas wanted $530. A little too much for me. Well i walked into the bargain center one day at cabelas and saw them sitting at the counter. Turns out the packaging had been ruined and it had no manual. Picked it up for $370. If you keep your eyes open you can find the best deals. Would definitely recommend.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-30-2012, 09:13 AM
chopperman's Avatar
chopperman chopperman is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Sexsmith
Posts: 488
Default Nikon

Check out the Nikon range finders, I've had one for years and it worked perfectly. Gets a target reading off small objects and is bang on for distance. Had mine stolen out of my truck and I'm going to replace it with another Nikon. They are also reasonably priced.
__________________
Live each day like its the last.....
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-30-2012, 09:16 AM
Full Curl Earl Full Curl Earl is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern Alberta
Posts: 1,704
Default agree

I have to agree as well. The first Bushnell, tha larger one, was probably one of the best rangefinders made, and I wonder what's in that first model that they stopped using in all the ones that followed? I owned 2 top end Bushnells rated for 1200 and never saw them zap anything over 580 ish! Not a mountain face, a house, anything! Then I purchased a Leupold, same thing! Fraudulent really! Then Leica came into my life, and this 1600 will read out past it's limits. All the garbage units I bought trying to keep the price down, I could have bought 2 Leicas!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-30-2012, 09:17 AM
Okotokian's Avatar
Okotokian Okotokian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Uh, guess? :)
Posts: 26,739
Default

My thought is that one really needs to find out what the realistic ranging ability is on FUR. Look at the Bushnell "Sport 850". 850 yards sounds good, but that's for reflective targets. Their claimed range for deer? 200 yards. Seems useless IMHO. Personally, I wouldn't bother with one that couldn't range at least 500 yards on fur. I got the Leupold RX 1000i. Their claim for deer is 600 yards. Seems to check out so far. I also wanted the angle compensator, having missed a long downhill shot last season. The illuminated reticle is nice too, though not sure if it is tha necessary. Could live without that.

Like most things I buy, I started out looking for something inexpensive and talked myself up the price range LOL I should not be left alone in stores. LOL
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-30-2012, 09:25 AM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,131
Default

Quote:
All the garbage units I bought trying to keep the price down, I could have bought 2 Leicas!
That happens a lot more than most people like to admit.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-30-2012, 09:45 AM
bpoppa85 bpoppa85 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 180
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Full Curl Earl View Post
I have to agree as well. The first Bushnell, tha larger one, was probably one of the best rangefinders made, and I wonder what's in that first model that they stopped using in all the ones that followed? I owned 2 top end Bushnells rated for 1200 and never saw them zap anything over 580 ish! Not a mountain face, a house, anything! Then I purchased a Leupold, same thing! Fraudulent really! Then Leica came into my life, and this 1600 will read out past it's limits. All the garbage units I bought trying to keep the price down, I could have bought 2 Leicas!
The leupold rx-1000i claims that it will range a deer to 600 yards, trees to 700 yards and a reflective target to 1000 yards. I haven't had a chance to hunt with the unit yet so i haven't tested it on fur but i ranged a bale of hay at just over 850 yards. So i believe it would propably do a deer out to 600. But honestly in my opinion at that distance who cares....who's making 600 yards shots? Range the tree beside it or just behind or the patch of bushes just in front of it and you'll at least have an idea of where you are in relation to the animal.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-30-2012, 09:50 AM
JohnB JohnB is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: North
Posts: 2,184
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
That happens a lot more than most people like to admit.
Yup, get what you pay for. I would just save up and get a Leica.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-30-2012, 09:54 AM
full_throttle full_throttle is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 666
Default

Leica 1600
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-30-2012, 10:53 AM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,131
Default

Quote:
But honestly in my opinion at that distance who cares....who's making 600 yards shots? Range the tree beside it or just behind or the patch of bushes just in front of it and you'll at least have an idea of where you are in relation to the animal.
In a light fog or drizzle, that range can be reduced even more. If I am paying good money for a rangefinder, I want one that can range as far as I intend to shoot under any conditions. In an open field where longer shots are quite common, there may not be trees or bush nearby, and even at 500 yards,an "idea" of the distance is not good enough.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-30-2012, 11:27 AM
beansgunsghandi beansgunsghandi is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Canadian Rockies
Posts: 456
Default

I bought a Bushnell Sport 600 off on-line for $150. I mostly use it to get the range on some place I'll be sitting for a while, it works great for that out to about 500. I mostly use trees or something handy to get a few key distance markers, then put it away. I'm happy with my purchase.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-30-2012, 11:29 AM
Rackmastr Rackmastr is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7,720
Default

Leica......
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-30-2012, 01:29 PM
BackPackHunter BackPackHunter is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,345
Default

Leica compared to Swarovski
Swarovski wins, way better unit, but its a little bigger little more $
But has a better lazer

I just sold my CRF 1600 and don't miss it one bit
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.