Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Fishing Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-17-2013, 09:25 AM
catchandeat catchandeat is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 329
Default invisa swivels...

Was watching the fishing network today and saw this new product called the "invisa swivel."
Apparently it's made completely out of fluorocarbon so it's almost invisible.
Really cool idea to make your presentation that much more stealthy, but then again how much does a regular swivel "scare" fish?
http://www.aquateko.com/Aquateko_Inv...wivels_s/3.htm

Anybody use em before? I'm thinking it's probably not going to make a significant difference in terms of bites, but who knows...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-17-2013, 09:27 AM
ineptflux's Avatar
ineptflux ineptflux is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 331
Default

I've wondered this as well, totally thought it was just a gimmick like most of the commercials on there lol.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-17-2013, 09:51 AM
EZM's Avatar
EZM EZM is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 11,858
Default

The product has been on the shelf for a few years now. They are quite large and bulky compared to a regular swivel snap.

With break test rating ranging from 12lbs up to 55lbs they are simply not strong enough for any reasonable fishing application.

Considering the $4 per unit cost and the size - I can get a premium quality Berkley snap swivel, rated for 300lbs for half the cost.

I you want invisible connections - use a loop to tie your fluorocarbon leader directly to your lure and run it up 30" up to a swivel snap to your main line. Tying a loop each time you want to change out is a pain in the butt with cold hands, in a rocking boat and takes time.

My opinion is - simply no application for this expensive, weak, bulky connection.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-17-2013, 10:33 AM
huntsfurfish huntsfurfish is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 7,350
Default

What about finicky walleye?

edit: 4-6 lb leader or line, a 12 lb break strength for the swivel should be sufficient.

Neutrally buoyant too
.
__________________
.
eat a snickers


made in Alberta__ born n raised.


FS-Tinfool hats by the roll.

Last edited by huntsfurfish; 08-17-2013 at 10:57 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-17-2013, 10:34 AM
catchandeat catchandeat is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 329
Default

I was kind of thinking the same thing, but wasn't totally sure, thanks guys!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-17-2013, 10:53 AM
Dr. Fish's Avatar
Dr. Fish Dr. Fish is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 369
Default

Use them all the time, and love them.
Never had one break.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-17-2013, 10:56 AM
huntsfurfish huntsfurfish is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 7,350
Default

edited my post above
__________________
.
eat a snickers


made in Alberta__ born n raised.


FS-Tinfool hats by the roll.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-17-2013, 11:57 PM
EZM's Avatar
EZM EZM is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 11,858
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by huntsfurfish View Post
What about finicky walleye?

edit: 4-6 lb leader or line, a 12 lb break strength for the swivel should be sufficient.

Neutrally buoyant too
.
I would just tie a loop to my jig or lure with 6-8lb flouroclear and run it up 5-6 feet to my main line - there you can connect with anything you like. Ussually 5-6 feet up the rod is plenty far away from your presentation.

however - I still have a ultra light set up with some 6lb vanish for those super clear water, super shy walleyes and trout.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-18-2013, 12:09 AM
huntsfurfish huntsfurfish is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 7,350
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EZM View Post
I would just tie a loop to my jig or lure with 6-8lb flouroclear and run it up 5-6 feet to my main line - there you can connect with anything you like. Ussually 5-6 feet up the rod is plenty far away from your presentation.

however - I still have a ultra light set up with some 6lb vanish for those super clear water, super shy walleyes and trout.
But your missing the swivel, the key ingredient.

You are thinking snap not swivel.

And I am thinking rigging(lindy) not jigging.

If you are going with FC why not take it a step further
__________________
.
eat a snickers


made in Alberta__ born n raised.


FS-Tinfool hats by the roll.

Last edited by huntsfurfish; 08-18-2013 at 12:27 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-18-2013, 12:33 AM
fish gunner fish gunner is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: on a mishn for fishn.
Posts: 8,790
Cool

Neat idea , I prefer the smallest conventional swivels I have off shore sz16 it takes 30 lb power pro to break one,they are less than 1/4 inch long,for a leader aplication 24-30" from a lure its good as invisible for me and the fish.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-18-2013, 09:33 AM
catchandeat catchandeat is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 329
Default

I actually just rechecked the website and realized that the unit price is only like 1.25 per swivel, it's five bucks for a pack of four I think the website said..
I've got way to much fishing stuff already for this year, but maybe if they make there way into basspro or something I might have to give them a shot....
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-18-2013, 10:26 AM
Hunter Trav Hunter Trav is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,690
Default

I picked up a combo pack that had a few of each sizes in it to use this year. I liked them, and I'm going to continue using them for things like Lindy rigging and such. I even took a duo lock snap and put it on one to make a snap swivel out of it to try on a spinner rig to see how they did with line twist. Worked fine, a bit of a pain getting the duo lock on, but it worked. You can flex them back and forth quite a bit, and I haven't been able to break one yet. They seem like they would, but they are surprisingly strong...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-18-2013, 10:59 AM
huntsfurfish huntsfurfish is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 7,350
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hunter Trav View Post
I picked up a combo pack that had a few of each sizes in it to use this year. I liked them, and I'm going to continue using them for things like Lindy rigging and such. I even took a duo lock snap and put it on one to make a snap swivel out of it to try on a spinner rig to see how they did with line twist. Worked fine, a bit of a pain getting the duo lock on, but it worked. You can flex them back and forth quite a bit, and I haven't been able to break one yet. They seem like they would, but they are surprisingly strong...
Nice to here from someone else who has actually used them!
__________________
.
eat a snickers


made in Alberta__ born n raised.


FS-Tinfool hats by the roll.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-18-2013, 11:43 AM
catchandeat catchandeat is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 329
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hunter Trav View Post
I picked up a combo pack that had a few of each sizes in it to use this year. I liked them, and I'm going to continue using them for things like Lindy rigging and such. I even took a duo lock snap and put it on one to make a snap swivel out of it to try on a spinner rig to see how they did with line twist. Worked fine, a bit of a pain getting the duo lock on, but it worked. You can flex them back and forth quite a bit, and I haven't been able to break one yet. They seem like they would, but they are surprisingly strong...
cool, thanks for the input!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-18-2013, 01:18 PM
AppleJax's Avatar
AppleJax AppleJax is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Sturgeon County
Posts: 1,893
Default

I used the 12 pound swivel the last couple weeks for bass and trout in BC. They worked just fine for me.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-19-2013, 09:48 AM
Walleyedude Walleyedude is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,706
Default

I use the very small metal swivels, I'm not sure on the size, but I think they're rated for around 12-16 lb. I've never worried about the swivel breaking or being the weak point in my setup. The 6 or 8 lb leader is going to break long before a metal swivel.

Those definitely might be worth a try. I can't see using one for rigging, as the weight is right at the swivel most of the time anyway and visibility of the swivel isn't a big issue, but they might be a really slick way to tie the Powerpro main line to the fluoro leader. I generally use a blood knot, but adding the swivel would help with line twist and still be largely invisible. It would just be a question of how large they are when they get to the guides on the rod.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-19-2013, 01:11 PM
huntsfurfish huntsfurfish is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 7,350
Default

I like to use short leaders to start and lengthen as needed. Bobber (uni) knot and bead. Neutrally buoyant swivel is better. Lots of people fish with long leaders(most of the time not needed). With this setup I can go from 1-10' easily.

Do you have to have it?
no

But then, I have caught some very large walleye on straight superline.
No FC no mono.
__________________
.
eat a snickers


made in Alberta__ born n raised.


FS-Tinfool hats by the roll.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-20-2013, 09:21 AM
cube cube is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,939
Default

I use them when connecting a mono or flouro mainline to a "shorter" (less than 3 feet) flouro leader in still fishing applications (ie. jigging, tip ups etc). Have never had one fail but can't say that I have caught more or bigger fish for the extra expense. Just thought that if you already paid extra for invisible line and leader it would only make sense to finish it off with a low visibility swivel.

I don't use them for connecting to braided main lines or lindy rigs as the line or weight is already visible so I don't think they would be worth the extra expense in those situations, for those situations if I feel I might need less visibility I use a modified Albright knot or a regular swivel to connect the two lines and use a much longer flouro leader.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-20-2013, 09:31 AM
catchandeat catchandeat is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 329
Default

interesting, thanks for all the input guys. Might be worth picking up a few in the future to try for some different applications..
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-22-2013, 05:13 PM
catchandeat catchandeat is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 329
Default

stopped in at the fishing hole today, ended up picking up some invisa swivels as well as a few other things, also stopped and looked at the HDS 7 gen 2 touch that some of you may remember that I was thinking of purchasing, but I think i'm going to end up buying it next year.
Anyway i'll try them out and let you all know how they work
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.