|
06-17-2009, 08:32 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: slave lake
Posts: 4,221
|
|
Decelerator or Limb Saver?
I'm going to finaly replace the factory recoil pads on a couple of my guns and was wondering what to go with. Both the Decelerator and Limb Saver seem highly reccomended, is either one better than the other?
|
06-17-2009, 08:35 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 15,859
|
|
After using both, I prefer the Decelerator.
|
06-17-2009, 08:35 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,181
|
|
The limbsaver absorbs more recoil,but it is not nearly as durable,and I find that it is actually too grippy when shouldering the gun.It just doesn't slip into place as easily as the Decelerator.
|
06-17-2009, 08:44 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 15,859
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11
The limbsaver absorbs more recoil,but it is not nearly as durable,and I find that it is actually too grippy when shouldering the gun.It just doesn't slip into place as easily as the Decelerator.
|
That is exactly my reasoning for preferring the Decelerator. It also shapes nicer and finishes better.
|
06-17-2009, 08:51 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,087
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck
After using both, I prefer the Decelerator.
|
Same.
|
06-17-2009, 08:51 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Grande Prairie
Posts: 1,361
|
|
I like the limbsaver better, if it is done properly.
|
06-17-2009, 08:53 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: slave lake
Posts: 4,221
|
|
Any tips on shaping and finishing while I'm at it? If I understand it correctly I can freeze them and then use an angle grinder with a flapper disk on it. Correct me if I'm wrong.
|
06-17-2009, 09:39 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: northern alberta
Posts: 2,661
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cal
Any tips on shaping and finishing while I'm at it? If I understand it correctly I can freeze them and then use an angle grinder with a flapper disk on it. Correct me if I'm wrong.
|
if it gets that hard when its cold i wouldnt want to be using it in november.
not saying if you could do it or not. never installed one. but just seems weird to me.
__________________
|
06-17-2009, 09:56 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: slave lake
Posts: 4,221
|
|
How would you go about it jaylow?
|
06-17-2009, 10:19 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 20
|
|
I just installed a limbsaver
The limbsaver actually isn't too bad to grind down, just follow the directions. It requires the use of a special jig, I just made one my self doesn't take too long. Biggest thing is while getting close to the final grinding stages spray WD40 on the grinding pad, it will made the pad look perfectly smooth. There is a video off the limbsaver site that shows you everything you need to know.
Mark
|
06-17-2009, 10:35 PM
|
|
Not sure what you are putting it on but the fitted Limbsavers fit very well and I've really grown to like them. Recoil reduction is definitely superior to anything else I've tried.
|
06-17-2009, 10:40 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 15,859
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheephunter
Not sure what you are putting it on but the fitted Limbsavers fit very well and I've really grown to like them. Recoil reduction is definitely superior to anything else I've tried.
|
Do you happen to have a close up photo of one them installed?
|
06-17-2009, 10:42 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck
Do you happen to have a close up photo of one them installed?
|
Sorry I don't.
|
06-17-2009, 11:01 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 15,859
|
|
Don't be to disappointed, but I think your McMillan comes with the Decelerator.
|
06-17-2009, 11:05 PM
|
|
That's it, I'm sending it back!
Actually my Kimber has a Decelerator on it and it's a great pad but I think the Limbsaver offers a bit more recoil reduction. Both great pads though.
|
06-18-2009, 06:23 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,591
|
|
The decelerator is a better pad if one is looking for a recoil pad that is firmer to offer more accuracy.
The limbsaver is a softer pad however, and will absorb more recoil.
I have noticed dramatic accuracy differences when using both.
I will explain this for those not knowing of what I speak.
The Limbsaver moves more when the firearm is shoulder, and does not let the gun sit as stable as the decelerator does.
This movement is transferred into the gun , and is noticable in the accuracy on the target.
A person must be able to decide whether or not the recoil reduction coupled with the accuracy loss is sufficient to use such a pad.
On a long rang varmint rig, I can live with the decelerator with a bit more recoil.
on a hunting rifle, I tend to use the Limbsaver, knowing it will not afford as much accuracy, but offers more recoil reduction.
Most of my shotguns have Limsavers on them.
Both are good pads, but I prefer to install decelerators.
Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
|
06-18-2009, 09:27 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: northern alberta
Posts: 2,661
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cal
How would you go about it jaylow?
|
http://www.limbsaver.com/2009/produc...index.php#nine
looks like you were kinda right there. says to get a finished look to freeze the pad overnight then rub it down with sandpaper and wd-40.
but that still means that if the weather is below zero that the pad will freeze up solid. so how does it work in the field in november or way up north in the tundra?
__________________
|
06-18-2009, 09:29 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: northern alberta
Posts: 2,661
|
|
id like to get a better pad myself for the .444 . but i was also considering getting one of the limbsaver shoulder pads. then i dont have to mess with the rifle. but then again i dont want to look like im wearing a diaper over my shoulder?
__________________
|
06-18-2009, 09:43 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,591
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaylow?
http://www.limbsaver.com/2009/produc...index.php#nine
looks like you were kinda right there. says to get a finished look to freeze the pad overnight then rub it down with sandpaper and wd-40.
but that still means that if the weather is below zero that the pad will freeze up solid. so how does it work in the field in november or way up north in the tundra?
|
The pad actually doesn't get solid to tthe point where it will not absorb recoil, it will still do that.
it will be a bit harder , but not solid.
Cat
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!
|
06-18-2009, 10:14 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: northern alberta
Posts: 2,661
|
|
i was at the range the other day and got to try a buddys new tc encore. the recoil pad on those are awesome. makes a 30-06 feel more like a little shove rather than a sharp punch. im not sure what to compare it to, maybe a little more than a 243.
__________________
|
06-18-2009, 12:10 PM
|
|
Gone Hunting
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,708
|
|
I have Limbsaver pads on all my Sako's and they did not required any custom fitting... same for Tikka's.
I like them a lot, especially on 338 Win Mag.
Andrew
|
06-18-2009, 02:27 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SE Calgary Ab
Posts: 2,627
|
|
I do like my limbsaver, have never used a deccelerator. I bought the one made to fit my ruger. It was easy to install, the fit is good. It absorbs recoil very well.
Good luck with whatever you decide to go with.
__________________
FallAirFever
Spend some time outside today, it will lift you higher
|
06-18-2009, 07:21 PM
|
|
I vote Limbsaver. Had them both. Recoil is for *******.
|
06-18-2009, 07:38 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 907
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11
The limbsaver absorbs more recoil,but it is not nearly as durable,and I find that it is actually too grippy when shouldering the gun.It just doesn't slip into place as easily as the Decelerator.
|
Ditto, except I haven't had any noticeable issues with durability as of yet. It would make sense though, as they are softer and less dense than the Decelerator.
|
06-18-2009, 08:32 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Cowtown
Posts: 997
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gitrdun
I vote Limbsaver. Had them both. Recoil is for *******.
|
LMAO I'll second that!!
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:50 PM.
|