Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Guns & Ammo Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-14-2020, 06:20 PM
chuck's Avatar
chuck chuck is online now
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,066
Default Wilson hand seaters?

Does anyone use these with an arbor press? How do you find concentricity compared to other “competition” seaters? Thanks.
__________________
“For the same reason that some top African PH's order rifles from D'Arcy Echols to use as loaners -- because we have to go in and clean up any messes they make.”
-Phil Shoemaker
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-14-2020, 08:37 PM
260 Rem 260 Rem is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: East Central Alberta
Posts: 7,982
Default

I use them but have never measured run-out. Down range results seem pretty decent so I have no reason to think they are not making concentric loads.
__________________
Old Guys Rule
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-14-2020, 09:05 PM
Bushrat's Avatar
Bushrat Bushrat is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5,753
Default

Most guys I know use them with an arbor press. I find the overall length of loaded rounds is more consistent when using them in a press, easier on the hands ,especially if you have a lot of neck tension and loading larger amounts.. Concentricity is similar to "competition" seaters, both can make straight ammo as long as the brass your loading it into is also concentric and square.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-15-2020, 10:20 AM
DLab DLab is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Medicine Hat
Posts: 349
Default

I use them on 3 cartridges 6BR 30BR and 6.5CM. with a Sinclair Arbor press,concentricity and seating depth consistency are both excellent.
I've used them and their Bushing Neck sizing dies also.
I use Redding dies for sizing now,but I used to love the looks on guys faces when I started talking about depriming and neck sizing with a mallet on my BR cases with Wilson hand dies. lol
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-15-2020, 11:30 AM
Dean2's Avatar
Dean2 Dean2 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 8,143
Default

Tried them and the Arbor press. Too slow with no gain in concentricity, accuracy of seating depth etc. If anything, being consistent with the Arbor press was a lot tougher than using a regular press. Biggest improvement I found was by working over the press to make sure everything was lined and square, ram ran true and linkage worked right. Once you got the press good a tight they make great concentric rounds. A lot of what gets blamed on dies is actually the press.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-15-2020, 01:33 PM
32-40win 32-40win is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 4,896
Default

For me, I would maybe use one as a portable loading setup to use at the range, but, I'd try other stuff first with my existing dies and see if it will work the same out there as at home. Definitely a sign of the OCD of chasing bugholes setting in. What flavour of bug do you have in the rug and how much do you think you can actually gain from it, vs are you willing to risk the investment not accomplishing anything for you when all is said and done.
__________________
You should also be a member;
CCFR
CSSA
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-15-2020, 04:29 PM
6.5 shooter's Avatar
6.5 shooter 6.5 shooter is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Medicine Hat
Posts: 2,680
Default

I love them especially on the smaller rounds, no more pinched fingers between the press and seater die....As for slower then regular dies..never noticed any lose in time once you figure out how to use them.

Most people make the mistake of taking the seater stem out of the die then dropping a bullet in, then the seater stem...not the way to use the die...

Back to your question the arbour press works fine, not as big of a mechanical advantage like a conventional press but the "feel" when seating a bullet is much more sensitive..also Like DLab said you can load and seat bullets with a rubber mallet if you have too......

I like them..but still keep my 35 year old Rockchucker on the bench for most jobs where precision is not the key factor.
__________________
.
Trades I would interested in:

-.22 Hornet or K Hornet
- light weight walking rifle in .204
- Anything in 6.5mm.
- Sightron rifle scopes, 4.5x14x42mm or 4x16x42mm especially! with the HHR reticule.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-15-2020, 05:17 PM
DanOO DanOO is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 69
Default

If the die is straight it will give you quality bullet seating.
Another advantage is in changing seating depths, this can be done using seater die shims or a micrometer top.
When changing or using different bullets it is an advantage in seating.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.