 |
|
10-29-2009, 10:21 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pheasant heaven....Magrath.
Posts: 5,424
|
|
whew oilers win!!!we need some rest and some tamiflu!!!
|
10-29-2009, 10:22 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 4,428
|
|
Wooo that was a lucky win in the SO but I just don't care unlike the backwards cousins to the south when we choke we get the W still.......... this time lol
__________________
Don't blame me, I'm just a volunteer
|
10-29-2009, 10:31 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pheasant heaven....Magrath.
Posts: 5,424
|
|
doesn't matter how just matters how many...
|
10-29-2009, 10:34 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,384
|
|
Ok... They didnt CHOKE.....
But they sure as hell GAGGED on that one.
Ahhh Only 6 months of this stuff
LOLOL
Jamie
|
10-29-2009, 10:36 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Wainwright
Posts: 1,361
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamie
Ok... They didnt CHOKE.....
But they sure as hell GAGGED on that one.
Ahhh Only 6 months of this stuff
LOLOL
Jamie
|
Maybe not a choke.... but definitely more of a vurp than a gag!
|
10-29-2009, 10:37 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Beaumont
Posts: 2,238
|
|
They certainly know how to make it interesting. That flurry in the last 30 seconds of OT was pretty exciting.
|
10-29-2009, 11:20 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 758
|
|
Canucks won without Lui and Raycroft was amazing...can't complain! And wow...Edmonton, two 4 goal leads...shows the explosiveness of that Detroit team!
|
10-30-2009, 07:36 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 4,257
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kanonfodder
I may just pay for my CHOKE post lol lol
|
Save it for April.... 
|
10-30-2009, 10:04 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 4,428
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dss44
Canucks won without Lui and Raycroft was amazing...can't complain! And wow...Edmonton, two 4 goal leads...shows the explosiveness of that Detroit team!
|
Did Detroit not score 4 in the third on your Nuks for the win? 
And BP your post implies you believe that the Oil will be in the playoffs....on the bandwagon just in case the Shames do their post season faceplant again huh?
__________________
Don't blame me, I'm just a volunteer
|
10-30-2009, 04:12 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 4,257
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kanonfodder
Did Detroit not score 4 in the third on your Nuks for the win?
And BP your post implies you believe that the Oil will be in the playoffs....on the bandwagon just in case the Shames do their post season faceplant again huh? |
Nah, I just don't think the Coil have enough depth to make it in to the Playoffs this year, guess we will see come April 07/10.... 
|
10-30-2009, 04:15 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pheasant heaven....Magrath.
Posts: 5,424
|
|
hmm the oilers don't have enough depth?? who is the flames back up goalie?? bear cat murray???
|
10-30-2009, 04:25 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 4,257
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheClash
hmm the oilers don't have enough depth?? who is the flames back up goalie?? bear cat murray???
|
Oh of course the Goalie thing..so really how many teams now days actually play a 2 goalie system ?? the CAP makes it almost impossible for teams to have 2 star goalies anymore, the Flames have 4 lines that can score alot of goals, they work on there "D" game with coach Sutter and they should be in good shape, they have a ton of depth unlike there little cousins up north....
|
10-30-2009, 04:40 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 4,257
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheClash
hmm the oilers don't have enough depth?? who is the flames back up goalie?? bear cat murray???
|
So who do the Coil have as a back-up....."Jeff Drouin-Deslauriers" WOW that's impressive I didn't realize the Coil were so deep in net...
|
10-30-2009, 05:04 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pheasant heaven....Magrath.
Posts: 5,424
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackpheasant
|
much deeper than the flames are in net for sure....team falls apart when flames back up comes in...i am not saying that the oilers are mega deep..but far better off than the flames are in net.
that being said..i am still not convinced that the oilers will make it into the playoffs...but they are getting better.
|
11-04-2009, 09:15 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Drumheller
Posts: 2,666
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheClash
much deeper than the flames are in net for sure....team falls apart when flames back up comes in...i am not saying that the oilers are mega deep..but far better off than the flames are in net.
that being said..i am still not convinced that the oilers will make it into the playoffs...but they are getting better.
|
How about that McBackup tonight?? 38 saves and looked excellent. I would have preferred a little better rebound control but he was the reason the flames won this game.
|
11-04-2009, 09:37 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pheasant heaven....Magrath.
Posts: 5,424
|
|
well i guess we'll see how that horse can run if kipper really is sick...
|
11-05-2009, 04:12 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 12
|
|
I believe the coilers have yet to beat the flames this season,and they probably won't. i also predict the coilers won't even come close to making the playoffs. I guess that is what happens when stortini is playing 20min. plus per game! the coilers aren't even close to calgary's depth. at least the flames won't get the H1N1 lol
|
11-05-2009, 10:28 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 4,257
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheClash
well i guess we'll see how that horse can run if kipper really is sick...
|
Kipper didn't look to sick tonight - in fact he was stellar...again...
|
11-05-2009, 10:49 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pheasant heaven....Magrath.
Posts: 5,424
|
|
my kingdom for a stay at home dman.....
|
11-05-2009, 11:14 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 12
|
|
flames win and the coilers losers again, life is good !!
|
11-05-2009, 11:30 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 4,428
|
|
Tough to compete when the team has the flu lots of injuries andthe wheel of lines going. Ah well season is still young and hopefully the Oil start to regain there early season form...GO OIL ..still confident in a playoff position.
__________________
Don't blame me, I'm just a volunteer
|
11-05-2009, 11:38 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 758
|
|
Watch out for them Canucks...especially once they get healthy...just look at how good they've been injured...10-4 in last 14 and rash of injuries like i've never seen before!!!
|
11-06-2009, 09:22 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pheasant heaven....Magrath.
Posts: 5,424
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kanonfodder
Tough to compete when the team has the flu lots of injuries andthe wheel of lines going. Ah well season is still young and hopefully the Oil start to regain there early season form...GO OIL ..still confident in a playoff position.
|
i wish i could say that was all it is...but i just think we are far to easy to play against in our own end....and teams know it. just dump it in the corner, win the battle, cycle the puck for a bit and we fall apart and look like a pee wee team out there...easy pickings for teams that can play deep and pass well.
|
11-06-2009, 03:27 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Beaumont
Posts: 2,238
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dss44
Watch out for them Canucks...especially once they get healthy...just look at how good they've been injured...10-4 in last 14 and rash of injuries like i've never seen before!!!
|
Agreed buddy. The Nucks have been looking pretty darn good considering they have had such a ridiculous amount of injuries. Raycroft has played well and the team is playing very tight defensively as a whole.
Every season has lots of ups and downs though. I fully expect there to be some more slumps, even after everyone is healthy. Then people will say stupid things like "they should trade D. Sedin and Luongo for a 2nd round pick because they played better without them" when in reality it's just the nature of an 82 game season.
|
11-06-2009, 03:33 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,179
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheClash
much deeper than the flames are in net for sure....team falls apart when flames back up comes in...i am not saying that the oilers are mega deep..but far better off than the flames are in net.
that being said..i am still not convinced that the oilers will make it into the playoffs...but they are getting better.
|
Mchileheny (However its spelt) Beat the stars! As long as kipper doesn't get tired were fine in the playoffs. And with the Flames playing so well now imagine when Iginla and Jokinen turn it on hahah. Wankmenton fans will just have more to complain about.
|
11-06-2009, 10:17 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 12
|
|
i didn't think the nucks would do that well at all with lou out. we will see come playoff time. it would be nice to see cal vs van in the playoffs
|
11-09-2009, 07:39 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Brooks
Posts: 21
|
|
3 game suspension???
I can't beleive that they NHL handed Glencross a 3 game suspension for that little tap on Drury . There wasn't even a penalty.  Drury needs to quit hockey since he is riding on his, what 5th concusion . And Richards gets nothing. WOW
Go Flames Go
|
11-10-2009, 08:33 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Beaumont
Posts: 2,238
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charmax
I can't beleive that they NHL handed Glencross a 3 game suspension for that little tap on Drury . There wasn't even a penalty. Drury needs to quit hockey since he is riding on his, what 5th concusion . And Richards gets nothing. WOW
Go Flames Go |
The Glencross hit was completely different than the Richards hit in my opinion. The reason, in my opinion, that Glencross deserved the suspension is that Drury never touched the puck.
Whether the "clean" hits like Richards' on Booth, or Mitchell's on Toews, or Phaneuf's on Okposo, should be penalized is a debate that will come up at the GM meeting. As of right now, those hits are fully within the rules. The hit on Drury was not.
|
11-10-2009, 02:51 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 4,257
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hunt_and_fish
The Glencross hit was completely different than the Richards hit in my opinion. The reason, in my opinion, that Glencross deserved the suspension is that Drury never touched the puck.
Whether the "clean" hits like Richards' on Booth, or Mitchell's on Toews, or Phaneuf's on Okposo, should be penalized is a debate that will come up at the GM meeting. As of right now, those hits are fully within the rules. The hit on Drury was not.
|
H & F I agree with your assessment here, Glendross screwed up plain and simple, the puck was no where near Drury when the hit occured....I didn't here much arguement from the Flames camp after the ruling either so it is what it is.......... 
|
11-10-2009, 03:23 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,179
|
|
Flames going for yet ANOTHER win tonight haha
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:03 PM.
|
