Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-16-2017, 07:09 PM
Spidey's Avatar
Spidey Spidey is online now
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: At the base of a mountain beside a creek
Posts: 2,427
Default Drone collides with passenger plane

Well.... it happened. A pilot friend of mine sent me this link. He's had a few close calls with drones and predicted this.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montre...ebec-1.4355792


Looks like regulations are coming on line soon, as referenced in the article. Curious to hear people's thoughts on the new rules.

"The updated rules will include a minimum age for drone operators, a mandatory written test and users will be required to register their names and addresses on the drone itself.

As it stands, anyone found to have endangered the safety of an aircraft could face a $25,000 fine or prison time.

Garneau's office stated in a release that 1,596 drone incidents have been reported to Transport Canada in 2017, 131 of which were deemed aviation safety concerns."
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-16-2017, 07:22 PM
260 Rem 260 Rem is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: East Central Alberta
Posts: 8,315
Default

I hope they find the boso responsible and impose the max penalty. Don’t know if the new regs require it, but should have a provision to insure drone owner/operators can be identified...maybe like registering a vehicle...a license ID required on the machine, insurance.
__________________
Old Guys Rule
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-16-2017, 07:25 PM
Ken07AOVette's Avatar
Ken07AOVette Ken07AOVette is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Alberta
Posts: 24,071
Default

What an idiot (whoever was flying the drone). Giving Garneau more ammunition.

Did anyone else read where there was no damage? I actually talked to Transport Canada Enforcement division about this. They have flown drones through jet engines, zero damage.
__________________
Only dead fish go with the flow. The rest use their brains in life.


Originally Posted by Twisted Canuck
I wasn't thinking far enough ahead for an outcome, I was ranting. By definition, a rant doesn't imply much forethought.....
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-16-2017, 07:27 PM
bobinthesky bobinthesky is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Between the mountains and the prairies.
Posts: 1,949
Default

Pretty sure the regulations are already in place.

https://www.tc.gc.ca/media/documents...users_EN_2.pdf
__________________
Life is too short too shoot ugly guns.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-16-2017, 07:31 PM
bobinthesky bobinthesky is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Between the mountains and the prairies.
Posts: 1,949
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken07AOVette View Post
What an idiot (whoever was flying the drone). Giving Garneau more ammunition.

Did anyone else read where there was no damage? I actually talked to Transport Canada Enforcement division about this. They have flown drones through jet engines, zero damage.


Firing frozen chickens into jet engines on test beds during development is standard practice and a drone is likely no different however, I've known live (and unfrozen) birds to be ingested into jet engines and cause complete engine failures so this doesn't really make it alright to fly drones into the path of aircraft. Besides, take a bird or drone through the windshield and it's more dangerous than having an engine failure when the pilot or pilots are incapacitated.
__________________
Life is too short too shoot ugly guns.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-16-2017, 07:33 PM
Reddin Reddin is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 273
Default

It was just a matter of when.
__________________
“Sometimes people don't want to hear the truth because they don't want their illusions destroyed.” ― Friedrich Nietzsche

"Toe da so" - Ricky, Trailer Park Boys
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-16-2017, 07:59 PM
Selkirk's Avatar
Selkirk Selkirk is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: In the shadow of the Valhalla Mountains, BC .
Posts: 9,175
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobinthesky View Post
Pretty sure the regulations are already in place.

https://www.tc.gc.ca/media/documents...users_EN_2.pdf
Those are just the interim rules as they stand now. The hammer drops (more extensive/stricter rules) sometime next year.

I think I'll just stick to flying my kite

Selkirk
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-16-2017, 08:49 PM
bobinthesky bobinthesky is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Between the mountains and the prairies.
Posts: 1,949
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Selkirk View Post
Those are just the interim rules as they stand now. The hammer drops (more extensive/stricter rules) sometime next year.

I think I'll just stick to flying my kite

Selkirk

True, but they are still orders of the court awaiting passage into law, you best have deep pockets if you wish to fight them.
__________________
Life is too short too shoot ugly guns.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-16-2017, 09:37 PM
Ken07AOVette's Avatar
Ken07AOVette Ken07AOVette is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Alberta
Posts: 24,071
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobinthesky View Post
Firing frozen chickens into jet engines on test beds during development is standard practice and a drone is likely no different however, I've known live (and unfrozen) birds to be ingested into jet engines and cause complete engine failures so this doesn't really make it alright to fly drones into the path of aircraft. Besides, take a bird or drone through the windshield and it's more dangerous than having an engine failure when the pilot or pilots are incapacitated.
Transport Canada says there are no recreational drones that will damage a commercial jet.
__________________
Only dead fish go with the flow. The rest use their brains in life.


Originally Posted by Twisted Canuck
I wasn't thinking far enough ahead for an outcome, I was ranting. By definition, a rant doesn't imply much forethought.....
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-16-2017, 10:04 PM
roper1 roper1 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Strathmore
Posts: 5,626
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken07AOVette View Post
Transport Canada says there are no recreational drones that will damage a commercial jet.
Why would TC have a 5.5 km buffer where drones can't fly.....?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-16-2017, 10:23 PM
Mackinaw Mackinaw is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,808
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken07AOVette View Post
Transport Canada says there are no recreational drones that will damage a commercial jet.
not so. I'm concerned that it could be catastrophic," Aaron McCrorie, an aviation enforcement official with Transport Canada, told CBC News.

"We don't have definitive information, but I am concerned it could cause an airplane to crash

Drone collision could cause engine failure in commercial jets - Technology & Science - CBC News - CBC.ca

www.cbc.ca › news › technology › dron...

mack
__________________
LISTEN FOR THE "POP"
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-16-2017, 10:36 PM
lannie lannie is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: CNP
Posts: 3,760
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by roper1 View Post
Why would TC have a 5.5 km buffer where drones can't fly.....?
Exactly.
__________________
You are what you do, not what you say.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-16-2017, 11:27 PM
260 Rem 260 Rem is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: East Central Alberta
Posts: 8,315
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by roper1 View Post
Why would TC have a 5.5 km buffer where drones can't fly.....?
Because they could cause an aircraft to crash and kill people.
__________________
Old Guys Rule
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-16-2017, 11:29 PM
260 Rem 260 Rem is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: East Central Alberta
Posts: 8,315
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken07AOVette View Post
Transport Canada says there are no recreational drones that will damage a commercial jet.
Commercial jets are not the only aircraft that use airports. Lots of other vulnerable spots on aircraft besides the engines. Ingesting a drone could result in in some very expensive repairs even if the result was not catastrophic.
I have family flying commercial. Would cry no tears if they were banned 10 miles from an airport....and required to carry millions in PL & PD.
__________________
Old Guys Rule

Last edited by 260 Rem; 10-16-2017 at 11:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-16-2017, 11:30 PM
dfarms11 dfarms11 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 628
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lannie View Post
Exactly.
Wow! Using that philoṣphy I guess trudeau must be absolutely correct that all corporations are tax evadors and must be taxed more too!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-17-2017, 12:25 AM
sikwhiskey sikwhiskey is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Lethbridge
Posts: 2,045
Default

Just a matter of time before some nut job puts explosives on a drone and flies it into wherever.......
__________________
"Unthinking respect for Authority is the greatest enemy of truth"
Albert Einstein
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-17-2017, 05:48 AM
58thecat's Avatar
58thecat 58thecat is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: At the end of the Thirsty Beaver Trail, Pinsky lake, Alberta.
Posts: 24,623
Default

Yup and that's why things are regulated to the hilt...because of idiots!
__________________

Be careful when you follow the masses, sometimes the "M" is silent...
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-17-2017, 05:54 AM
58thecat's Avatar
58thecat 58thecat is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: At the end of the Thirsty Beaver Trail, Pinsky lake, Alberta.
Posts: 24,623
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken07AOVette View Post
What an idiot (whoever was flying the drone). Giving Garneau more ammunition.

Did anyone else read where there was no damage? I actually talked to Transport Canada Enforcement division about this. They have flown drones through jet engines, zero damage.
Blade nicks, melted plastic etc, compressor/stator blades will or could be damaged or the damage is in the amount of downtime to inspect, repair, replace the engine....trust me did this for a living repairing, overhauling, test cell running jet engines for 20 years....the sad thing is that this meathead has now put drones under a higher magnifying glass for all the wrong reasons.
__________________

Be careful when you follow the masses, sometimes the "M" is silent...
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-17-2017, 07:16 AM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,161
Default

Give the idiot the $25,000 fine, make him pay all costs for any inspections/delays that resulted from the incident, and ban him from operating drones for life. That may send a message to the other idiots that won't obey the regulations.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-17-2017, 07:16 AM
Mackinaw Mackinaw is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,808
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 58thecat View Post
Blade nicks, melted plastic etc, compressor/stator blades will or could be damaged or the damage is in the amount of downtime to inspect, repair, replace the engine....trust me did this for a living repairing, overhauling, test cell running jet engines for 20 years....the sad thing is that this meathead has now put drones under a higher magnifying glass for all the wrong reasons.
you are right unfortunately it is like a gun it is not the product at fault but the user.

mack
__________________
LISTEN FOR THE "POP"
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 10-17-2017, 07:41 AM
bobinthesky bobinthesky is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Between the mountains and the prairies.
Posts: 1,949
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken07AOVette View Post
Transport Canada says there are no recreational drones that will damage a commercial jet.


If TC says it's true then feel free to believe them!
__________________
Life is too short too shoot ugly guns.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-17-2017, 07:46 AM
bobinthesky bobinthesky is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Between the mountains and the prairies.
Posts: 1,949
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
Give the idiot the $25,000 fine, make him pay all costs for any inspections/delays that resulted from the incident, and ban him from operating drones for life. That may send a message to the other idiots that won't obey the regulations.


The $25k fine would be nothing in comparison to the repair bill and the downtime! In many cases these costs will be in the millions!
__________________
Life is too short too shoot ugly guns.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-17-2017, 08:25 AM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,161
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobinthesky View Post
The $25k fine would be nothing in comparison to the repair bill and the downtime! In many cases these costs will be in the millions!
Then let the idiot be financially ruined for his stupidity. Perhaps other people that hear about this will be more inclined to obey the regulations.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-17-2017, 08:34 AM
guysmiley guysmiley is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 614
Default

If the offender was willing to disobey the regulations regarding flying near an airport, what makes anybody think they followed the rules regarding having their name and phone number on the drone?

I would be surprised if they found out who was flying it.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-17-2017, 08:35 AM
260 Rem 260 Rem is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: East Central Alberta
Posts: 8,315
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
Then let the idiot be financially ruined for his stupidity. Perhaps other people that hear about this will be more inclined to obey the regulations.
The trouble will be in identifying ... so like with vehicles...will require a system of owner registration, transfer, PL & PD insurance, and pilot licensing.
__________________
Old Guys Rule
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-17-2017, 08:42 AM
260 Rem 260 Rem is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: East Central Alberta
Posts: 8,315
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobinthesky View Post
The $25k fine would be nothing in comparison to the repair bill and the downtime! In many cases these costs will be in the millions!
About 20yrs ago, my son hit a bird with a C130 going into an airport in Chile. Five crew on the ground for 5 days while a replacement engine was flown in and installed. Wonder what the bill would have been.
__________________
Old Guys Rule
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-17-2017, 12:43 PM
bobinthesky bobinthesky is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Between the mountains and the prairies.
Posts: 1,949
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
Then let the idiot be financially ruined for his stupidity. Perhaps other people that hear about this will be more inclined to obey the regulations.
I'm not disagreeing with you.
__________________
Life is too short too shoot ugly guns.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-17-2017, 12:46 PM
bobinthesky bobinthesky is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Between the mountains and the prairies.
Posts: 1,949
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 260 Rem View Post
About 20yrs ago, my son hit a bird with a C130 going into an airport in Chile. Five crew on the ground for 5 days while a replacement engine was flown in and installed. Wonder what the bill would have been.

I wouldn't want to guess on the C-130 but I'm aware of a Hawker biz Jet a few years ago that ingested a bird into one of it's TPE-331 engines and that repair bill was around 1 million.
__________________
Life is too short too shoot ugly guns.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-17-2017, 12:50 PM
Sundancefisher's Avatar
Sundancefisher Sundancefisher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Calgary Perchdance
Posts: 18,896
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken07AOVette View Post
Transport Canada says there are no recreational drones that will damage a commercial jet.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/flig...ane-collision/

Have you read this?

"Birds can disintegrate relatively easily...you get something like a very viscous bulk of fluid on the other side" says Bayandor. "A drone can be like a rock going through the engine."
__________________
It is not the most intellectual of the species that survives; it is not the strongest that survives; but the species that survives is the one that is able best to adapt and adjust to the changing environment in which it finds itself. Charles Darwin
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-17-2017, 12:53 PM
1899b's Avatar
1899b 1899b is online now
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sherwood Park Ab
Posts: 6,283
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken07AOVette View Post
What an idiot (whoever was flying the drone). Giving Garneau more ammunition.

Did anyone else read where there was no damage? I actually talked to Transport Canada Enforcement division about this. They have flown drones through jet engines, zero damage.
But a Canada Goose will put down an airliner into the Hudson River?
__________________
An awful lot of big game was killed with the .30-06 including the big bears before everyone became affluent enough to own a rifle for every species of game they might hunt.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.