Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Hunting Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-14-2018, 08:17 AM
sbchunter sbchunter is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 40
Default Vortex bino’s

Looking at a vortex bino’s but can’t decide what size to go with. I hunt mostly open fields and some bush. Can not decide if I should go 10x42, 10x50 or even 12x50. I do not have the best eyes so 8x are out. Any pro’s or con’s about the 3 options or experiences with these ?

Thanks for any info or advise.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-14-2018, 08:33 AM
Nyksta Nyksta is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,542
Default

10x42 are great

The second number is the objective size and creates the size of the beam of light that is available for your eye. The objective size glass also has a big weight attached to it. The beam of light size is smaller or bigger depending on your magnification that you choose. In a dim evening, your eye pupil opening will be about 4mm. Anything more than this is essentially wasted. A big exit pupil is easy to get eye into and its got lots of 'forgiveness' for seeing the image and avoiding the black edge. Shaky rides that are bumping you around while viewing love these oversized binoculars. If your standing still while viewing, 10x42 are great.

10x42
42mm diameter ÷ 10 magnification = 4.2mm

10x50
50mm ÷ 10 mag = 5mm eye light

12x50
50mm ÷ 12 = 4.16mm

Last edited by Nyksta; 07-14-2018 at 08:44 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-14-2018, 10:18 AM
bobalong bobalong is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,130
Default

I have had some Diamonback 8x42 for a few years now. I hunt on the prairies exclusively and they work very well for big game and waterfowl.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-14-2018, 11:08 AM
Dallen Baugh's Avatar
Dallen Baugh Dallen Baugh is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 45
Default

10 x 42 all the way. anything over 10x gets a little tough to use effectively without tripods and anything over 42mm objective gets a little heavy on the long treks. personal preference really. I have the 10 x 42 viper HDs and love the crap out of them.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-15-2018, 12:01 AM
spellswrong spellswrong is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 128
Default

Im assuming hunting open fields and bush you aren't hiking 10 miles with camp on your back so I would go with the 10x50's. They are bigger and heavier but well worth it in the early and fading light as well as in darker bush. The diameter differences might not seem that large but it makes a difference I LOVE more light. Check out birdforum.net those guys take binos seriously some of their comments or opinions might help to sway you one way or another
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-15-2018, 03:24 PM
Warrior's Avatar
Warrior Warrior is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 785
Default

I just bought the 10-50 and like them so far
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-16-2018, 02:29 PM
outdoorsman12b outdoorsman12b is online now
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 134
Default

You will want to research the quality of the optic and power. The higher you go the more noticeable the cons of the bino will show through. If your considering Viper or razor then all options might be viable. Diamondback I would stick to 8 or 10 X 42.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-16-2018, 04:12 PM
bay17jay bay17jay is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 23
Default

Another vote for the Diamondback 10 x 42.
... and don't forget the tri-pod.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.