 |
|
04-13-2014, 08:40 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 18
|
|
Can we fishing at red circus area at TRAVERS inlet?
TRAVERS: No fishing within 100M of the Canal inlet structure.
|
04-13-2014, 08:45 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Look behind you :)
Posts: 27,782
|
|
Is it within 100 meters? Is it part of the canal inlet structure?
LC
__________________
|
04-13-2014, 08:53 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 8,144
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lefty-Canuck
Is it within 100 meters? Is it part of the canal inlet structure?
LC
|
X2 seems self explanatory.
__________________
Jay: Mostly harmless... 
Time, it makes you old. Experience makes you wise. It's only a fool who judges life by what he sees in other peoples' eyes.
- Strung Out
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams
|
04-13-2014, 09:01 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 152
|
|
|
04-13-2014, 09:15 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Lethbridge, Alberta
Posts: 4,063
|
|
simple answer is NOPE.
I think they may be expanding the buoys out there to the 100m no fish zone so it is easy to tell if someone isn't following that specific reg. change.
|
04-13-2014, 09:55 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 7,350
|
|
100 meter half circle around the structure not just out "front". That was what I thought it was going to be (from the meeting). That is how I interpret it from the regs as well.
__________________
.
eat a snickers
made in Alberta__ born n raised.
FS-Tinfool hats by the roll.  
|
04-13-2014, 09:59 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Look behind you :)
Posts: 27,782
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by huntsfurfish
100 meter half circle around the structure not just out "front". That was what I thought it was going to be (from the meeting). That is how I interpret it from the regs as well.
|
I would agree 100m of shoreline leading up to the start of the structure on both sides.
LC
__________________
|
04-13-2014, 10:11 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,857
|
|
The regulations state that the area you have circus is CLOSED to fishing.
__________________
IG: @gibsontilley
|
04-13-2014, 10:14 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 152
|
|
fair enough
|
04-14-2014, 12:31 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 436
|
|
Really
this is how i see it.
GoogleEarth_Image.jpg
that yelow line is 100m im sure your good to go. this rule is nothing new. As long as your outside the buoys...thats how i see it.
|
04-14-2014, 12:37 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 12,770
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dennisb
this is how i see it.
Attachment 89841
that yelow line is 100m im sure your good to go. this rule is nothing new. As long as your outside the buoys...thats how i see it. |
might want to look up structure in the dictionary
__________________
Dinos
681
Shove your masks and your vaccines 
Non Compliance!!!!!!
"According to Trudeau, Im an extremist who needs to be dealt with"
#Trudeau must go
Wheres The Funds
The vaccine was not brought in for COVID. COVID was brought in for the vaccine. Once you realize that, everything else makes sense.” ~ Dr. Reiner Fuellmich
|
04-14-2014, 12:55 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 60
|
|
The recommended closed area is 100 meters out from the front of the spillway (the rock banks are the front spillway), 100 meters north of the spillway fence and 100 meters south of the spillway fence. The plans as proposed are to place a bouy line to indicate the closed area. Fishing within this closed area is NOT allowed. This is the information that was posted after the meeting in Vulcan.
|
04-14-2014, 01:07 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 18
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by team beef
the recommended closed area is 100 meters out from the front of the spillway (the rock banks are the front spillway), 100 meters north of the spillway fence and 100 meters south of the spillway fence. The plans as proposed are to place a bouy line to indicate the closed area. Fishing within this closed area is not allowed. This is the information that was posted after the meeting in vulcan.
|
thanks.
|
04-14-2014, 01:19 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 152
|
|
From my understanding, wasn't the whole purpose of extending the limit distance was to prevent shore fishermen from an easy walleye catch? I would say the entire rocky shorelines is closed at the minimum...
|
04-14-2014, 01:24 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Look behind you :)
Posts: 27,782
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WayneChristie
might want to look up structure in the dictionary
|
I agree....the structure would encompass any of the "man made" areas including the two "wings" of rock "structures" that are either side of the mouth....IMHO.
LC
__________________
|
04-14-2014, 01:42 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 436
|
|
Hmmm, i just spoke to someone in Vulcan, Calgary and Lethbridge. Both officers in Calgary and Lethbridge say that my interpitation is correct. However the Vulcan person ( not Officer ) was unclear and the officer is off for a few days but is suppose to call me back. I would be willing to bet that what ever the Vulcan officer says is/will be correct. Will keep intouch.
|
04-14-2014, 01:46 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Look behind you :)
Posts: 27,782
|
|
The interpretation of the guy issuing the tickets is the most pertinent.
LC
__________________
|
04-14-2014, 02:25 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 1,777
|
|
My interpretation is that the 100m mark begins on the outside of the gravel berms around the inlet. So fishing of any kind on the gravel berms would be a no-no.
I sent Terry Clayton an email for clarification.
|
04-14-2014, 03:09 PM
|
|
Suspended User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 58
|
|
Should just shut Travers down completely!! All this crap is bs!
|
04-14-2014, 03:24 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 1,777
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walleye99
Should just shut Travers down completely!! All this crap is bs!
|
|
04-14-2014, 03:35 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,939
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lefty-Canuck
The interpretation of the guy issuing the tickets is the most pertinent.
LC
|
Actually perhaps the prosecuters or the judges when it gets to the court system.
|
04-14-2014, 04:42 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 273
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WayneChristie
might want to look up structure in the dictionary
|
might want to look up competitive derby in the regulations
|
04-14-2014, 05:51 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Look behind you :)
Posts: 27,782
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cube
Actually perhaps the prosecuters or the judges when it gets to the court system.
|
True...but the ticket gets you there in first place.
LC
__________________
|
04-14-2014, 06:51 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 7,350
|
|
This was what was discussed at the meeting. Extending 100 meters in all directions. Not sure if it went through though(law). red lines are about 100m.
 rough
Buoys would be at the end of the red lines in a half circle to protect the fish in that area. As well as the fish within the structure itself.
__________________
.
eat a snickers
made in Alberta__ born n raised.
FS-Tinfool hats by the roll.
Last edited by huntsfurfish; 04-14-2014 at 06:57 PM.
|
04-14-2014, 06:53 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 60
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by huntsfurfish
This was what was discussed at the meeting. Extending 100 meters in all directions. Not sure if it went through though(law). red lines are about 100m.
rough |
Yes this is what was suggested at the meeting.
|
04-14-2014, 07:14 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Look behind you :)
Posts: 27,782
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by huntsfurfish
This was what was discussed at the meeting. Extending 100 meters in all directions. Not sure if it went through though(law). red lines are about 100m.
rough
Buoys would be at the end of the red lines in a half circle to protect the fish in that area. As well as the fish within the structure itself. |
That's exactly how I interpret the rule as written.
LC
__________________
|
04-14-2014, 07:44 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 7,350
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gslice
From my understanding, wasn't the whole purpose of extending the limit distance was to prevent shore fishermen from an easy walleye catch? I would say the entire rocky shorelines is closed at the minimum...
|
And boat fishermen.
__________________
.
eat a snickers
made in Alberta__ born n raised.
FS-Tinfool hats by the roll.
|
04-15-2014, 08:44 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 1,777
|
|
For what it's worth, Terry Clayton got back to me this morning and he believes the 'canal inlet structure' begins where the cement from the inlet touches the water in Travers. So in his opinion, the no fishing boundary would look something like this (rough estimate obviously):
|
04-15-2014, 09:05 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Cochrane, Alberta
Posts: 1,758
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoFugger21
For what it's worth, Terry Clayton got back to me this morning and he believes the 'canal inlet structure' begins where the cement from the inlet touches the water in Travers. So in his opinion, the no fishing boundary would look something like this (rough estimate obviously):
|
Hmmmmmmm.....in that case, not much has changed for boat guys. But the shore guys have really had a wrench thrown into the gears.
__________________
"You're gonna need a bigger boat!" - Martin Brody, 1975
"There seems to be alot of urinating in breakfast cereal around here." - Rackman, 2010
"It is true, there are dead beat dads out there, and there are thousands of dead beat moms too, who live off the efforts of good men trying to do the right thing." -KegRiver, 2011
"You have social media to thank for turning everyone into self-righteous know-it-alls.." -random internet dude, 2015
|
04-15-2014, 09:33 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 1,777
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack&7
Hmmmmmmm.....in that case, not much has changed for boat guys. But the shore guys have really had a wrench thrown into the gears.
|
I should mention that my drawing is just my interpretation of what he said in the email. I replied back to make sure I'm not putting words in his mouth, so to speak.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:58 PM.
|
Linear Mode
