Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 03-08-2014, 09:10 PM
From The Hip From The Hip is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,052
Default

IMO Quebec needs Canada more than Canada needs Quebec.If Quebec were to seperate they will get burdened with their fair share of the national debt and no longer get transfer payments not to mention a bunch of other stuff.Quebec would have to get it's own currency as their is no damn way they would get to use the Canadian dollar as a fiat currency as they would no longer be Canadian.All Federal jobs in Quebec would instantly be terminated across all departments including the MP's of the NDP as they would no longer have a voice in the Canadian parliament or the Senate as they are no longer Canadian representatives.The army/air force/navy/coast guard also would be stripped and redistributed to other bases in Canada.Or let go if they did not want with to belong to those Canadian branches of service.

Also every citizen of Quebec would lose all entitlements instantly to the OAS retirement benefit.No way Canada is going to pay OAS to people in Quebec when they are not sending taxes to Ottawa.

Then there is the civil unrest that would happen from all the money that the province no longer gets.No more low cost university education nor funding of the arts and other such stuff.Imagine how bad the student demonstrations would be compared to when they last happened and the cost of tuition still had university students in Quebec paying the lowest tuition costs in Canada.Then there is the angle with the first nations in Quebec and that would get ugly real fast as Quebec could not rely on the Canadian army to take of things.

If Quebec did actually seperate it would be a short divorce and they would come crawling back begging to be part of Canada.Though I do hope it would be with a lot of changes for Federal transfers and the like and a lot less pandering to a bunch of whiney poutine eating distinct society types.

FTH
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-08-2014, 09:12 PM
BeeGuy BeeGuy is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: down by the river
Posts: 11,428
Default

It's wrong to think that Quebec has an empty hand. They don't, and many places in Canada would feel the repercussions of such a foolish action.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-08-2014, 10:26 PM
Redfrog's Avatar
Redfrog Redfrog is offline
Gone Hunting
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Between Bodo and a hard place
Posts: 20,168
Default

Quebec has nothing to bring to the table except irritation for Canada. Never has, never will. They suck on the teat till it's dry.

I say see ya, wouldn't want to be ya.
__________________
I'm not lying!!! You are just experiencing it differently.


It isn't a question of who will allow me, but who will stop me.. Ayn Rand
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 03-08-2014, 10:43 PM
BeeGuy BeeGuy is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: down by the river
Posts: 11,428
Default

Quebec contributes about 20% of Canada's GDP and 15% of international exports.

More importantly, Quebec has a diversified economy, with considerable manufacturing, something other more irritable provinces would do well to take note of while applying ointment to their sore nipples.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 03-08-2014, 11:15 PM
greylynx greylynx is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 12,078
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BeeGuy View Post
Quebec contributes about 20% of Canada's GDP and 15% of international exports.

More importantly, Quebec has a diversified economy, with considerable manufacturing, something other more irritable provinces would do well to take note of while applying ointment to their sore nipples.
International exports subsidized by Alberta.

What are the Alberta transfer payments that have gone to Quebec since 1968?

I figure about 150 billion by now.

87 percent of all new jobs in Canada in the last two years have been created in Alberta.

Ontario is on the rocks.

We feed them, and all they do is kick us in the face.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 03-09-2014, 01:33 AM
Wild&Free Wild&Free is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,928
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by greylynx View Post
International exports subsidized by Alberta.

What are the Alberta transfer payments that have gone to Quebec since 1968?

I figure about 150 billion by now.

87 percent of all new jobs in Canada in the last two years have been created in Alberta.

Ontario is on the rocks.

We feed them, and all they do is kick us in the face.
Banana Republics survive only so long as there are bananas
__________________
Respond, not react. - Saskatchewan proverb

We learn from history that we do not learn from history. - Hegel

Your obligation to fight has not been relieved because the battle is fierce and difficult. Ben Shapiro
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 03-09-2014, 05:30 AM
trophyboy trophyboy is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 773
Default

To answer the thread question:

WHO CARES? WE'D ALL BE BETTER OFF WITHOUT QUEBEC AND QUEBEC PROBABLY WOULD BE BETTER OFF TOO, AT LEAST IN THEIR OWN MINDS. AS LONG AS THEY PAY BACK THE BILLIONS IN TRANSFER PAYMENTS FIRST!
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 03-09-2014, 07:05 AM
norwestalta norwestalta is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Hythe
Posts: 4,354
Default

I say cut our loses. Even if it means we got to pay the bill we'll still be farther ahead. The old adage applies "don't call us we'll call you".
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 03-09-2014, 07:34 AM
connexion123 connexion123 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,524
Default

What would Canada look like without Quebec?...pretty darn good
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 03-09-2014, 10:24 AM
Big Daddy Badger Big Daddy Badger is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 12,558
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick284 View Post
Do you really think the Quebec soverigntists want to separate from Canada if it means paying back their portion of the national debt, and doing away with things like sociAl benefits and transfer payments.

The sovereignty seekers in Qc, are akin to a spoiled child throwing a tantrum, and promising to run away from home.

Once they figure out they can't have their cake and eat it too....... Guess where it will go?
I disagree.

Think about it for a minute... what they want is what all of us want really.... a better deal.
Who doesn't want that for themselves?

Albertans want to be free from transfer payments... Toronto solutions to gun control, bilingualism etc etc.
Nobody likes it when Ottawa forces something down their gullets.

The idea of individual countries or states forming an independant part of a whole is hardly new.... look at the USA and the UK.

Rather than get upset about what Quebec seems to be interested in...we should probably consider that its not a bad idea for the rest of us.

For one thing... it would know doubt result in a better balance of power between the provinces.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 03-09-2014, 11:06 AM
riden riden is online now
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,544
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by recce43 View Post
well 60% of lands in quebec are native lands so they would stay part of Canada under the treaty rights
The James Bay treaty would really muddy those waters. Natives in northern Quebec, no longer own the land.

It would be really complicated.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 03-09-2014, 11:20 AM
Sundancefisher's Avatar
Sundancefisher Sundancefisher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Calgary Perchdance
Posts: 18,883
Default

Nothing stops Quebec from using cdn currency for a new country of Quebec. They would have no control over monetary policy. A number of counties use US currency such as Zimbabwe.

Helps control runaway inflation. My trillion dollar Zimbabwe notes made for some crazy prices.
__________________
It is not the most intellectual of the species that survives; it is not the strongest that survives; but the species that survives is the one that is able best to adapt and adjust to the changing environment in which it finds itself. Charles Darwin
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 03-09-2014, 11:24 AM
BeeGuy BeeGuy is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: down by the river
Posts: 11,428
Default

I wonder how many posters in this thread have never been to Quebec...or have ever been outside of Alberta for that matter.

Quebec separating is about as brilliant an idea as Alberta separating.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 03-09-2014, 11:29 AM
norwestalta norwestalta is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Hythe
Posts: 4,354
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BeeGuy View Post
I wonder how many posters in this thread have never been to Quebec...or have ever been outside of Alberta for that matter.

Quebec separating is about as brilliant an idea as Alberta separating.
Either/or its all good. You going to lead the movement?
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 03-09-2014, 11:32 AM
Sundancefisher's Avatar
Sundancefisher Sundancefisher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Calgary Perchdance
Posts: 18,883
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BeeGuy View Post
I wonder how many posters in this thread have never been to Quebec...or have ever been outside of Alberta for that matter.

Quebec separating is about as brilliant an idea as Alberta separating.
I have.

What is the point. Quebec would have the vote to leave. I have not heard that we can vote for them to leave.

I don't think there are enough fanatics that would vote to leave. Common sense will prevail.

I woud take two quebecers perch fishing right now. Your average person is not a nut job.
__________________
It is not the most intellectual of the species that survives; it is not the strongest that survives; but the species that survives is the one that is able best to adapt and adjust to the changing environment in which it finds itself. Charles Darwin
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 03-09-2014, 11:37 AM
BeeGuy BeeGuy is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: down by the river
Posts: 11,428
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by norwestalta View Post
Either/or its all good. You going to lead the movement?
Nope. I prefer my Canada as a whole.

Would you prefer Alberta with Redford as Prime Minister/President?

It would be far more costly to lose Quebec than to keep them.

A diversified economy is a far more stable economy. Coal, natural gas, and oil is diversification though, hey?

Canada as a whole benefits from all its parts and would suffer as a whole if any one were removed.

Last edited by BeeGuy; 03-09-2014 at 11:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 03-09-2014, 11:41 AM
histyle's Avatar
histyle histyle is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: head of Zipper-lip Creek
Posts: 399
Default

I actually have been to Quebec, both for work & for vacation. It is a beautiful province, and the people in the rural areas are the salt of the earth kind of people that live in all rural areas. The problem is in the cities of Montreal & Quebec, and their surrounding 'burbs. These are the most entitled, bloviating, 'holier than thou' fools I have ever encountered in any language. They can vote to separate all they want, it is the rest of the country that subsidizes them that should get to vote, too. That would be an eye opener! I say good riddance, and please let your big, bloated, centralized big government Socialist Republic of New France door hit you in the butt at least 100X on the way out.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 03-09-2014, 11:42 AM
pickrel pat pickrel pat is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,268
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BeeGuy View Post
Nope. I prefer my Canada as a whole.

Would you prefer Alberta with Redford as Premier/President?

It would be far more costly to lose Quebec than to keep them.

A diversified economy is a far more stable economy. Coal, natural gas, and oil is diversification though, hey?

Canada as a whole benefits from all its parts and would suffer as a whole if any one were removed.
Agreed.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 03-09-2014, 11:48 AM
norwestalta norwestalta is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Hythe
Posts: 4,354
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BeeGuy View Post
Nope. I prefer my Canada as a whole.

Would you prefer Alberta with Redford as Premier/President?

It would be far more costly to lose Quebec than to keep them.

A diversified economy is a far more stable economy. Coal, natural gas, and oil is diversification though, hey?

Canada as a whole benefits from all its parts and would suffer as a whole if any one were removed.
That's fine if you prefer to have Canada as a whole. I prefer to see a eastern Canada and a western Canada.
Seems to me what we're lacking out here is manufacturing which we import anyways. I haven't seen much manufactured goods that come out of Quebec.
I think they need us much more then we need them
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 03-09-2014, 11:57 AM
BeeGuy BeeGuy is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: down by the river
Posts: 11,428
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by histyle View Post
I actually have been to Quebec, both for work & for vacation. It is a beautiful province, and the people in the rural areas are the salt of the earth kind of people that live in all rural areas. The problem is in the cities of Montreal & Quebec, and their surrounding 'burbs. These are the most entitled, bloviating, 'holier than thou' fools I have ever encountered in any language. They can vote to separate all they want, it is the rest of the country that subsidizes them that should get to vote, too. That would be an eye opener! I say good riddance, and please let your big, bloated, centralized big government Socialist Republic of New France door hit you in the butt at least 100X on the way out.
Sounds like rural Alberta compared to Calgary and Edmonton.
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 03-09-2014, 12:28 PM
Redfrog's Avatar
Redfrog Redfrog is offline
Gone Hunting
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Between Bodo and a hard place
Posts: 20,168
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by histyle View Post
I actually have been to Quebec, both for work & for vacation. It is a beautiful province, and the people in the rural areas are the salt of the earth kind of people that live in all rural areas. The problem is in the cities of Montreal & Quebec, and their surrounding 'burbs. These are the most entitled, bloviating, 'holier than thou' fools I have ever encountered in any language. They can vote to separate all they want, it is the rest of the country that subsidizes them that should get to vote, too. That would be an eye opener! I say good riddance, and please let your big, bloated, centralized big government Socialist Republic of New France door hit you in the butt at least 100X on the way out.
Well it looks like you don't post much, but when you do it's definitely worth reading.

You pretty much nailed it

It's easy to say Q has a diversified economy perking right along, and neglect to mention transfer payments and gov't subsidies grants and free money.
A teenager can do very well selling street art and picking tomatoes, as long as someone else pays the bills.

Beautiful province, great people, 'my Canada', sophisticated, bilingual, as long as both languages are French, and the best part........buses travelling there every day. The beauty of being free. Pack a jam sandwich and get on the bus if you don't like living in Alberta. I've never seen armed soldiers trying to stop someone from "getting gone."
__________________
I'm not lying!!! You are just experiencing it differently.


It isn't a question of who will allow me, but who will stop me.. Ayn Rand
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 03-09-2014, 12:38 PM
BBT BBT is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Cochrane
Posts: 626
Default

Give Quebec separatists PEI then charge them massive Tolls to use the bridge.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 03-09-2014, 05:02 PM
connexion123 connexion123 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,524
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BeeGuy View Post
I wonder how many posters in this thread have never been to Quebec...or have ever been outside of Alberta for that matter.

Quebec separating is about as brilliant an idea as Alberta separating.
Both good ideas, I agree.

And i've been, as well as many other places outside of Alberta.

But thanks for thinly veiling your contempt for people who wish to see quebec gone.

We're not all hicks who haven't left Alberta.

Last edited by connexion123; 03-09-2014 at 05:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 03-09-2014, 05:07 PM
silverdoctor silverdoctor is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Alberta
Posts: 10,937
Default

Quebec separation or their "soveriegnity" has nothing to do with them leaving Canada and becoming their own nation folks. they want to be the 40 year old living in the parents basement calling the shots and living off the parental tit.

They haven't even signed the constitution for gawd sakes, it's a temper tantrum cause it's not what they want.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 03-09-2014, 05:07 PM
Redfrog's Avatar
Redfrog Redfrog is offline
Gone Hunting
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Between Bodo and a hard place
Posts: 20,168
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by connexion123 View Post
Both good ideas, I agree.
Yep like a big frosty pitcher of Margaritas. Reason to celebrate.
__________________
I'm not lying!!! You are just experiencing it differently.


It isn't a question of who will allow me, but who will stop me.. Ayn Rand
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 03-09-2014, 05:16 PM
BeeGuy BeeGuy is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: down by the river
Posts: 11,428
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by connexion123 View Post
Both good ideas, I agree.

And i've been, as well as many other places outside of Alberta.

But thanks for thinly veiling your contempt for people who wish to see quebec gone.

We're not all hicks who haven't left Alberta.
Then you must realize that the average quebec-er is pretty much like the average Albertan. None too happy with their government.

Would you like the rest of Canada to judge you based on Alison Redford? Want to be judged on her policies? Want to be judged on her gross waste of taxpayer dollars?

That would be ridiculous wouldn't it?

What many people are confusing here is politics with people.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 03-09-2014, 05:33 PM
winger7mm's Avatar
winger7mm winger7mm is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lethbridge
Posts: 4,050
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BeeGuy View Post
Nope. I prefer my Canada as a whole.

Would you prefer Alberta with Redford as Prime Minister/President?

It would be far more costly to lose Quebec than to keep them.

A diversified economy is a far more stable economy. Coal, natural gas, and oil is diversification though, hey?

Canada as a whole benefits from all its parts and would suffer as a whole if any one were removed.
I can bet that almost everyone on AO calls themselfs Canadian, then Albertan (or where ever they call back home), But canadian first! Quebec nope, they are Quebecois. That right there is reason enough to say See Ya! Remember it wasnt that long ago they almost put a law in place where a major corporation such as walmart HAD to change its name to the french saying, until the corporation said do that and we'll pull our stores.

I may be jaded, I may not be overly educated, I may be young and dumb. I dont know the stats, but im sure most of them would like to be on there own but still accept the perks from more well off provinces. As I said before they are not Canadians they are Quebecois, better off with out them then with them IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 03-09-2014, 05:39 PM
BeeGuy BeeGuy is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: down by the river
Posts: 11,428
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by winger7mm View Post
I can bet that almost everyone on AO calls themselfs Canadian, then Albertan (or where ever they call back home), But canadian first! Quebec nope, they are Quebecois. That right there is reason enough to say See Ya! Remember it wasnt that long ago they almost put a law in place where a major corporation such as walmart HAD to change its name to the french saying, until the corporation said do that and we'll pull our stores.

I may be jaded, I may not be overly educated, I may be young and dumb. I dont know the stats, but im sure most of them would like to be on there own but still accept the perks from more well off provinces. As I said before they are not Canadians they are Quebecois, better off with out them then with them IMO.
What do you base that on? Anything? Stuff you read from other guys who paint an entire group of people with the same muddied brush?

Seems silly to hate something you admit to knowing little about.

Ever been to Quebec? Know many Quebec-ers?
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 03-09-2014, 05:40 PM
BeeGuy BeeGuy is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: down by the river
Posts: 11,428
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by winger7mm View Post
I can bet that almost everyone on AO calls themselfs Canadian, then Albertan (or where ever they call back home), But canadian first! Quebec nope, they are Quebecois. That right there is reason enough to say See Ya! Remember it wasnt that long ago they almost put a law in place where a major corporation such as walmart HAD to change its name to the french saying, until the corporation said do that and we'll pull our stores.

I may be jaded, I may not be overly educated, I may be young and dumb. I dont know the stats, but im sure most of them would like to be on there own but still accept the perks from more well off provinces. As I said before they are not Canadians they are Quebecois, better off with out them then with them IMO.
This is absolutely wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 03-09-2014, 06:10 PM
Redfrog's Avatar
Redfrog Redfrog is offline
Gone Hunting
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Between Bodo and a hard place
Posts: 20,168
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by winger7mm View Post
I can bet that almost everyone on AO calls themselfs Canadian, then Albertan (or where ever they call back home), But canadian first! Quebec nope, they are Quebecois. That right there is reason enough to say See Ya! Remember it wasnt that long ago they almost put a law in place where a major corporation such as walmart HAD to change its name to the french saying, until the corporation said do that and we'll pull our stores.

I may be jaded, I may not be overly educated, I may be young and dumb. I dont know the stats, but im sure most of them would like to be on there own but still accept the perks from more well off provinces. As I said before they are not Canadians they are Quebecois, better off with out them then with them IMO.

Of course you are correct. The entitlement attitude is pervasive in Q.

Don't worry about someone taking your stuff out of context. They have no argument and know it.
__________________
I'm not lying!!! You are just experiencing it differently.


It isn't a question of who will allow me, but who will stop me.. Ayn Rand
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.