Go Back   Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum > Main Category > Hunting Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-01-2016, 05:56 PM
Acesneights's Avatar
Acesneights Acesneights is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 560
Default Sheep poacher

I read this article and was just wondering if anyone knows where you get more information on stuff like this. As in details and is it public knowledge. At least if you didn't hear about this, you know now.

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-01-2016, 06:02 PM
thegunman's Avatar
thegunman thegunman is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: sundre ab
Posts: 364
Default

LOL. My dad was in the courtroom and told me about this case when they had it.
__________________
Once more into the fray....
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-01-2016, 06:07 PM
fatboyz fatboyz is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: rocky Mountain House
Posts: 1,538
Default

From what I've heard around town this is the incident referred to in the "hunt with savage encounters" thread and Skip Selk.
http://www.outdoorsmenforum.ca/showt...age+encounters
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-01-2016, 06:09 PM
Acesneights's Avatar
Acesneights Acesneights is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 560
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thegunman View Post
LOL. My dad was in the courtroom and told me about this case when they had it.
But no info to add then ????
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-01-2016, 06:23 PM
thegunman's Avatar
thegunman thegunman is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: sundre ab
Posts: 364
Default

Supposedly the outfitter had taken them into a zone where they didn't have an allocation for. They shot a ram and and left him. The Hunter had payed $25,000 for the hunt. Upon being caught they seized his rifle, and now he has this charge as well. The guide tried to defend himself and the Hunter asked him if he could honestly say he wasn't aware they were in the incorrect zone. To which the Hunter was unable to say yes. I forget all the things he was going to be charged with,but the fish and wildlife officer said the outfitter had an upcoming trial as well.
__________________
Once more into the fray....
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-01-2016, 06:40 PM
rocpilefsj's Avatar
rocpilefsj rocpilefsj is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Alberta
Posts: 717
Default

Word around Rocky was Logan got nailed for shooting a ram "a finger nail" under size and fish and wildlife went overboard/threw the book at him. Looks like I have some people to educate lol. It's one thing to man up and admit you made a mistake and take your lumps, but to abandon a sheep you should lose your guiding and hunting license for life.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-01-2016, 06:54 PM
Nordegg2 Nordegg2 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 80
Default

The ram was over an inch short on both sides. They left the entire sheep buried under a pile of rocks. As I stated in the prior thread this would come out. Now it is public info.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-01-2016, 07:00 PM
fatboyz fatboyz is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: rocky Mountain House
Posts: 1,538
Default

In the paper article it also said it was shot in a different zone then they had tags for (allocation).
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-01-2016, 07:05 PM
Acesneights's Avatar
Acesneights Acesneights is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 560
Default

Where was the prohibited area?? A park ?? Or just were the outfitter didn't have allocations ?? Also just like my original question, where does a guy find out facts and not just hear say?? Was the hunter a resident or non resident?? Thanks for the conversation
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-01-2016, 07:09 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,139
Default

"The outfitting company may also face charges" has me wondering if the outfitter even knew about the incident, or if the guide acted on his own and didn't even tell the outfitter. It sounds like that is what is being investigated.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-01-2016, 07:17 PM
Nordegg2 Nordegg2 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 80
Default

Not a prohibited area but the wrong wmu.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-01-2016, 07:22 PM
Ranger CS Ranger CS is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Pincher Creek
Posts: 921
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
"The outfitting company may also face charges" has me wondering if the outfitter even knew about the incident, or if the guide acted on his own and didn't even tell the outfitter. It sounds like that is what is being investigated.
The outfitter is and should be accountable for the actions of their guides.
Don't pass the seriousness of this onto the guide. Outfitters are paid big bucks for the services they provide and should not hide from the consequences of illegal acts under the skirts of their guides. It the outfitters responsibility to ensure their guides are capable and aware of where they are hunting and the regulations that apply. The outfitter should also face charges in this case.
__________________
Ranger

Last edited by Ranger CS; 02-01-2016 at 07:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-01-2016, 07:32 PM
Nordegg2 Nordegg2 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 80
Default

Precisely. The outfitter should be held responsible also. And in this case he knew exactly what was going on.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-01-2016, 07:38 PM
elkhunter11 elkhunter11 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camrose
Posts: 45,139
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nordegg2 View Post
Precisely. The outfitter should be held responsible also. And in this case he knew exactly what was going on.


If the prosecutor had proof that the outfitter knew all about this, he would have already charged the outfitter.
__________________
Only accurate guns are interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-01-2016, 07:47 PM
Ranger CS Ranger CS is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Pincher Creek
Posts: 921
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11 View Post
If the prosecutor had proof that the outfitter knew all about this, he would have already charged the outfitter.
Whether or not the outfitter knew about the illegal acts of his guide is irrelevant. The outfitter is, and always should be responsible for the actions of his employee, the guide. It's nice to have a safe to place to hide from the law. Come on.
__________________
Ranger
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-01-2016, 07:59 PM
Ruger99 Ruger99 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Water valley ( hour outside of Calgary )
Posts: 325
Default

i truly think the fines for poaching are not harsh enough ! if its shooting a sheep and leaving it or dumping 30 ducks in a ditch
( if you remember that story and outcome... )
they should never be aloud to hunt or guide again .
Maybe if fines were more harsh the sorry excuse for a "hunter" or guide or outfitter would smarten up . Leave the hunting to the ethical people quit looking at it as a income and go buy your meat a Safeway . People that see a animal as only Dollar amount have something wrong with them .
My two cents sorry if I offended anyone .
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-01-2016, 08:01 PM
waldedw's Avatar
waldedw waldedw is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Lloydminster
Posts: 4,515
Default

the penalties are still not harsh enough, 1 year ban for the hunter ????? maybe if he didn't know that he was outside their allotted area ???? he was fined $20,000 plus out the $24,000 he paid the outfitter and lost his rifle.
But the guide had to know they were outside their zone in which case he should get a ban for a minimum of 5 years as should the outfitter he was working for who must be held responsible for the illegal actions of his employees, you can bet your bottom this is not the first time that they " bent the law " in order to justify their healthy guiding fees, time to put some teeth into the laws, poaching effects all of us legal hunters.
__________________
The problem we have today is that the people who work for a living are outnumbered by the people who vote for a living.

We were all born ignorant but one must work very hard to remain that way.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-01-2016, 09:33 PM
bdub's Avatar
bdub bdub is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,713
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fatboyz View Post
From what I've heard around town this is the incident referred to in the "hunt with savage encounters" thread and Skip Selk.
http://www.outdoorsmenforum.ca/showt...age+encounters
Nordeg was bang on.

Is it just me or does it seem like poaching incidents involving outfitters/guides are popping up more often in the last few years or has been like this in Alberta for some time?
__________________
There are some who can live without wild things, and some who cannot. Aldo Leopold
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-01-2016, 09:49 PM
Nordegg2 Nordegg2 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 80
Default

I would think that poaching doesn't happen more than the past maybe even less. But the tolerance for it is a lot less.people have stopped turning a blind eye.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-01-2016, 10:08 PM
Acesneights's Avatar
Acesneights Acesneights is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 560
Default

Or is it that the threats of full curl has pushed people to push the limits and sometimes be wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 02-01-2016, 10:09 PM
lead chucker's Avatar
lead chucker lead chucker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 576
Default

And let me guess? APOS won't do a dam thing about this either?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-01-2016, 10:16 PM
blackmamba's Avatar
blackmamba blackmamba is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,003
Default

Where is his guiding territory.. I just watched a sheep hunt on wild TV with his guiding out fit..got on some tiny squeeker rams and the hunter missed 4 times..
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-02-2016, 06:10 AM
bdub's Avatar
bdub bdub is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,713
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Acesneights View Post
Or is it that the threats of full curl has pushed people to push the limits and sometimes be wrong.
A couple of the guide/outfitters incidents I am thinking of didn't involve sheep. The only other sheep incident I am thinking of was the one at Cadomin where the guide shot a large full curl ram on the mine site on his girlfriends late season tag.
__________________
There are some who can live without wild things, and some who cannot. Aldo Leopold
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-02-2016, 06:24 AM
Deer Hunter Deer Hunter is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,158
Default

Who is the outfitting company that may face charges?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 02-02-2016, 06:30 AM
Nordegg2 Nordegg2 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 80
Default

Selks alberta bighorns
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 02-02-2016, 06:59 AM
58thecat's Avatar
58thecat 58thecat is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: At the end of the Thirsty Beaver Trail, Pinsky lake, Alberta.
Posts: 24,607
Thumbs down

Quote:
Originally Posted by bdub View Post
Nordeg was bang on.

Is it just me or does it seem like poaching incidents involving outfitters/guides are popping up more often in the last few years or has been like this in Alberta for some time?
More than likely for some time just getting caught more right now.
Might get away with it for many years make huge amounts of cash on a whim you might get caught and pay a small price in fines when compared to what you made over the long haul. A bad gamble from my perspective because now your name is mud and at the end of the day that is the only thing you have...a last name mud!
__________________

Be careful when you follow the masses, sometimes the "M" is silent...
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 02-02-2016, 07:10 AM
LKILR's Avatar
LKILR LKILR is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Claresholm
Posts: 1,070
Default

Skip has a bad reputation for years now for bending the rules. I feel that the hunter likely was lead astray by the guide and outfitter. His fine should have been handed to the outfitter. I know a guide that worked for him that told me Skip have him bad info and sent him and his hunter to another outfitters area. Once he realized he was hunting another zone he quit and didn't go back. Also told me about salting.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 02-02-2016, 07:16 AM
Justahunter Justahunter is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 110
Default

Ah, now the truth is coming out and all those guys that hunted with skip in the past will be shi##ing their pants wondering if F&W will be knocking on their door to confiscate their sheep. Maybe you need to hire him to pick MUSHROOMS. LOL
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 02-02-2016, 07:23 AM
Deer Hunter Deer Hunter is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,158
Default

LOL^

Too bad the commercialization of hunting is wrecking it for all of us
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 02-02-2016, 07:35 AM
Nordegg2 Nordegg2 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 80
Default

It has nothing to do with commercialization and all to do with poor ethics and morals.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.