Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum

Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum (http://www.outdoorsmenforum.ca/index.php)
-   Guns & Ammo Discussion (http://www.outdoorsmenforum.ca/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   45-70 for bush gun any thoughts (http://www.outdoorsmenforum.ca/showthread.php?t=332980)

maudite 11-09-2017 07:42 PM

I have a Browning 86 carbine in 45/70 and I recommend them highly

openfire 11-09-2017 08:15 PM

1 Attachment(s)
I have a JM marlin, Great bush gun.
Took this Buck with it in some thick stuff, less then 30 yards.

Unregistered user 11-10-2017 07:51 AM

I really like the Leverevolution ammo in mine.

denied access 11-10-2017 09:13 AM

I have a SBL. Quality on the new ones is great. Tipped over a Bison no problem this fall. Carry it mostly for bear protection but its quickly becoming one of my favorites. Seems to do well with everlution ammo. I am able to clip a grouses head off with it. Order a safety delete from beartooth mercantile if using it for bear protection as the cross bolt safety is redundant and in a location on the slab sides that it can easily be accidentally engaged. Also get a brass shell follower and if you really want to do it up right order a bearproof extractor from wild west. Then load up the bolt and action with metal polish and get your pay your favorite child 5 bucks to cycle the action a thousand times while they watch TV.

Plus its as fun as 2 monkeys to shoot. My wife even likes shooting it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfxV51bTYs4

35 whelen 11-11-2017 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1899b (Post 3662428)
I went through the .45-70 guide gun and Marlin .444 phase years ago. Problem was I always found myself in cutblocks or on a cutline when out in the bush where in all reality it’s the last kinda firearm you would want in those circumstances. Go for it. Quench your thirst and see where it leads..

Yep I've got a 444 carry the 270 more often than not because of this

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk

Bowser 11-19-2017 08:03 PM

DO it...you'll have no regrets.

cschache 11-19-2017 08:27 PM

I had a marlin 45-70 stainless lever action guide and it was an awesome fire stick! lots of punching power! you will not be disappointed! :sHa_shakeshout:

Xbolt7mm 11-19-2017 08:48 PM

I think the cartridge is great but it depends on the gun, a lever, sure. I have a Billy Dixon Pedersoli and is about 4 feet long and heavy. Accurate like crazy but a bit long for the bush for me.

1899b 11-20-2017 06:48 AM

IMHO nothing beats a handy Savage 99c lever action in .308 or 7mm08. You have a nice carrying lever action rifle that still has a bit of stretch.

Mavrick 11-20-2017 04:44 PM

I have a Savage 99F, I didn't know they ever made a 7mm08. That would be a great 99. I have a 45-70 and 444 made in the 70's, both are great for a "bush gun".

Tactical Lever 11-21-2017 01:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobinthesky (Post 3662648)
The Marlin is a good rifle but in 45-70, the action is too short for the longer/heavier bullets which (IMO) are what is best at close range if your using it for bear defense. For hunting of course, the lighter 250 to 300 grain bullets are fine. Chiappa's 1886 clone has a larger action and can cycle the heavy bullets just fine but it's heavier and more expensive to buy but it is available in a short barrel version.
If you never get out of thick bush then these are good choices for hunting rifles but your severely handicapped when you step out onto a cut line and see the bull of your dreams standing 350 yards away presenting the perfect shot..... for a scoped rifle!

Those 250 gr. are varmint bullets! Maybe I'm stretching it, but not by too much.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobinthesky (Post 3663024)
Some bullets such as the ones you mention are designed with the Marlin in mind and they have the cannelure placed further ahead so the bullet can be seated deep enough to shorten the overall length. The downside to a forward cannelure is decreased powder space in the case. The upside to this is the popular belief that bullet weight trumps velocity for close in bear defense.
I can tell you from experience that 350 grain Hot Cor and 405 grain Remington bullets to name a couple are too long to cycle in the Marlin if crimped into the cannelure and these are the bullets that you will most likely find in your local store rather than specialty cast 525 grain Piledriver bullets.

Never heard of anyone having a problem with those bullets. I'm acquainted with a fella that uses a 480 gr. Lyman bullet in his with no issues.

I have no problem cycling the 350 gr. Hot Cor, 375 gr. RN cast, 400 gr. FN cast, 350 gr. Hornady all loaded to max COAL or slightly over. And the 405 Remington in factory ammunition as well. Maybe, I didn't use the cannelure, as I have the factory crimper for a couple.

Tactical Lever 11-21-2017 01:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobmac (Post 3662321)
I’m thinking about getting a 45-70 for my close range gun moose bear hopefully bison one day thought on the cal would be great thinking no scope
Thanks Bob

Great cartridge, does it's work without excess blood shot meat, and muzzle blast. I would plan on shooting cast for it.

Kako 03-20-2020 06:57 PM

Reviving an old post but I recently got a 45-70 1895GBL and I love it.

One asthetic issue on the butt pad but that's about it. Cycles great and shoots great.

I am not the best with semi buckhorn sights. At 50 yards I can hit 5 inch gongs no issue with these sights.

Battle Rat 03-20-2020 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobinthesky (Post 3663142)
Calgary International Airport338
I'm not trying to take anything away from the 1895 Marlin, they have far too good of a reputation for me to take that on. That being said, it was my intention to answer the question which was "thoughts?" so I gave mine. Obviously you don't agree and that's fine with me but as good as the Marlin is, it does have limitations or weak points and they're well known. The fact that the 1895 action is slightly shorter than the 1886 action could be viewed as minor by some but the upside is that it's lighter to carry. The other is that the 1895 is not as strong as the 1886. This isn't my opinion but a commonly known fact, the biggest weak point in the Marlin is the receiver in between the barrel and magazine, if a Marlin is going to come apart from over pressure, this is usually where it will happen. In general, heavy bullets can be seated longer in the 1886 and pushed to a higher velocity. At this point we're splitting hairs but don't let that stop you from enjoying the 1895, it's not my intention to do that as I've enjoyed mine for many years however, it's not an 1886!.

I read a test where pressures were pushed until they both blew.
The 1895 and the 1886 barrels failed before the receivers did.

gramps73 03-21-2020 11:31 AM

I don't have a 45-70 but I do have a marlin 444 and love it..
I think that both are great bush guns.

Tactical Lever 03-21-2020 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Battle Rat (Post 4131355)
I read a test where pressures were pushed until they both blew.
The 1895 and the 1886 barrels failed before the receivers did.

I've heard that the 1886 were stronger as well. Not sure, but they are both beefy toggle link actions. Have heard from guys that have shot the 1895 loose from an extended diet of hot loads. You don't really need to push it to the max though to have a serious big game rifle.

No doubt that the 1886 are stronger at the barrel/receiver connection. The 1895 barrels are fairly thin where they join.

Dean2 03-21-2020 12:05 PM

Pushing big bullets faster does not improve their killing ability and with the round or flat nose you aren't going to make a long distance round out of it. Push a 350-400 grain bullet at 1500 fps, very tolerable recoil which also provides far faster followup shots, usable ballistics to 200 yards and it will go through a Moose or Bear length wise. I know this for sure, done it many times on bear and a few times on moose. Have shot bear with the 45-70 at 1200 to 2100 fps, beyond 1500 or 1600 fps I can see no difference in knockdown power or killing efficiency.

With large bore rifles, it is the hole that kills. They will penetrate just fine so hit them where the hole will do a lot of organ, nervous system of blood flow damage and whatever you shoot will die very quickly.

Tactical Lever 03-21-2020 01:57 PM

Forgot to mention that the 1886 isn't just a toggle link, but that it has a strong twin bar lock up similar to an 1892. I believe that it would be a stronger action as the 92 is very strong and acts similarly to a falling block. Though I wouldn't compare that to a true falling block action.

I don't believe there is load data that favours an 1886 as an action stronger than an 1885 though.

colroggal 03-21-2020 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tactical Lever (Post 4131760)
Forgot to mention that the 1886 isn't just a toggle link, but that it has a strong twin bar lock up similar to an 1892. I believe that it would be a stronger action as the 92 is very strong and acts similarly to a falling block. Though I wouldn't compare that to a true falling block action.

I don't believe there is load data that favours an 1886 as an action stronger than an 1885 though.

The 1886 is not a toggle link action. Nor is the marlin 1895. They both operate with a solid bolt and beefy locking lugs, similar to the win 1892 and 1894.

The original Henry, the 1866 yellowboy and the 1873 are toggle link actions that are only strong enough for 44-40 and saami spec 45 colt loads.

Colin

Tactical Lever 03-21-2020 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by colroggal (Post 4131789)
The 1886 is not a toggle link action. Nor is the marlin 1895. They both operate with a solid bolt and beefy locking lugs, similar to the win 1892 and 1894.

The original Henry, the 1866 yellowboy and the 1873 are toggle link actions that are only strong enough for 44-40 and saami spec 45 colt loads.

Colin

No, you're right. I didn't mean toggle link, and should have termed it differently. I believe the correct term might be a camming action. Both pretty similar (between 92, 94, 85, 86) but the locking lugs of the 1885 only coming up part way into the bolt and the 94 using a solid "sheet" behind the bolt. It is a strong action, and a good gun, but I'm not sure I'd call the lock up beefy. It's a 336 that handles a longer shell, and there's nothing wrong with that.

My point being that they were a similar type. And while we call them strong actions, they aren't rotating bolt. Thanks for the correction and chance to put forward more accurate information.

Battle Rat 03-21-2020 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tactical Lever (Post 4131675)
I've heard that the 1886 were stronger as well. Not sure, but they are both beefy toggle link actions. Have heard from guys that have shot the 1895 loose from an extended diet of hot loads. You don't really need to push it to the max though to have a serious big game rifle.

No doubt that the 1886 are stronger at the barrel/receiver connection. The 1895 barrels are fairly thin where they join.

I'm using 405 gr hard cast at around 1750fps.
If that don't get it done then then I don't know what will.
I've loaded hotter but shooting some beef in the head and finding the bullet far past the shoulder .
Your right you don't need to push it to crazy speed to get great penetration.

SnipeHunter 03-22-2020 02:06 AM

M96 9.3x57 w/ 285 grain bullet may be a good budget alternative. Not 500 grains but...

Iron Brew 03-22-2020 09:20 AM

It's an old thread revived, but I can't resist a 45-70 post. Love the caliber. I had a gbl that I put the xs ghost ring and long rail on. That was a great modification. BTW - SOME marlin's are prone to jamming with the lever all the way open. Do your research. It takes a bit of slicking with a stone, and tuning with a small screwdriver, but they come nice and smooth. I think they have it solved in the new ones.

1899b 03-22-2020 09:38 AM

Went through my .45-70 and .444 Marlin stage about 20 years ago. Got tired of being hamstrung by these cartridges with game that needed a longer poke so those rifles started staying home more often than not. Conditions don’t always allow a good decent stalk to reel those yards in for a big thumper. When I lived in Fort McMUrray and Edson when prime hunting was mere minutes away it wasn’t a big deal to see a nice buck way out there and go home thinking tomorrow’s another day. But when it’s 3.5 hours one way to go hunting I have to take advantage of every day out as those days are limited now due to travel...

obsessed1 03-22-2020 10:32 AM

Practice
 
I have never felt the need for more reach when hunting with my 45-70. The receiver peep allows me to hit 8" plates out to 250 yds. Add a low power scope if you can't use irons acc get er done. 250 is about as farthest range anyone NEEDS to take game at in normal hunting conditions. And this is coming from a long range guy.

Kako 03-22-2020 11:36 AM

Do any of you nail polish the front irons with white or orange? I can't seem to focus the black or bronze.

That being said, my fav rifle right now is a Winchester 94 30-30. Light and accurate enough.

Tactical Lever 03-22-2020 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Battle Rat (Post 4132022)
I'm using 405 gr hard cast at around 1750fps.
If that don't get it done then then I don't know what will.
I've loaded hotter but shooting some beef in the head and finding the bullet far past the shoulder .
Your right you don't need to push it to crazy speed to get great penetration.

Yeah, that's plenty. Probably about perfect. I've been guilty of wanting to push it a bit, and for a while I wanted a high velocity 300 gr. bullet at around 2400 just to hit the magical 4000 ft./lb. mark. I realized later that this was kind of nonsensical, but maybe fun for non-edible game. Momentum with heavy bullets is where it's at; and just my personal opinion, and not necessarily based on pure data, but I feel that 400 to about 430 grain is kind of a sweet spot for both taking advantage of the cartridges ability to launch heavy, yet still have reasonable velocity for normal-ish. Have heard of guys cracking 2000 fps with 405's but that is probably where guns loosen up. And it's those high velocities that are more punishing for the shooter, probably more so for the lighter bullets at higher speed.

One of my reloading books has a story of a cape buffalo hunt with a 45-70, using 405 gr. bullets loaded warm out of a Marlin. Short story, is that a good bull was seen and shot broadside, and 2 more pumped into it just to do as much damage as possible before tracking a dangerous animal. The tracker announced two animals down; a smaller cow was behind the bull. The bullet penetrated through both animals at the shoulder and was dug out just under the offside shoulder of the cow.

Had a long conversation with Bill Bagwell, as he used to be a factory Goex shooter, and long time reloader for the 45-70. He loads all BP or equivalent loads with cast bullets. I believe his load is about 1300 fps with a 480 grain Lyman cast FN. Apparently the big Lyman works fine in an 1885 as well. He has a video of a zebra hunt, where the zebra shot at about 160 yards drops like a rock. It was supposed to be a tough enough animal that it was going to ruin his rifle's reputation for complete pass throughs according to his PH, or guide.

Bill had told me as well that with penetration tests that the best penetration was at about 1300 fps. I believe it has to do with fluid dynamics, but not completely sure, and have read about this before. And seems independent of bullet deformation, as that is the first thing that is brought up.

Tactical Lever 03-22-2020 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kako (Post 4132324)
Do any of you nail polish the front irons with white or orange? I can't seem to focus the black or bronze.

That being said, my fav rifle right now is a Winchester 94 30-30. Light and accurate enough.

Haven't nail polished any of my rifles, but I put some orange on the front sight of a pistol that was hard to pick up, and it helped.

A fiber optic front sight might be a help, too. Have a "dangerous game" upland shotgun that wears one, and it's a nice improvement. And also a pistol, that has benefitted from it.

Another option is a peep sight. My eyes don't adjust between the sights very fast I think, and have a scope on most of them, but a peep works sort of similar, in that you don't focus on the peep, unlike an open rear sight.

1899b 03-22-2020 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kako (Post 4132324)
Do any of you nail polish the front irons with white or orange? I can't seem to focus the black or bronze.

That being said, my fav rifle right now is a Winchester 94 30-30. Light and accurate enough.

I actually always drifted out the front site and replaced it with the Tru Glo fiber optic one. That combined with a Williams peep site was a nice combo...

Flight01 03-22-2020 01:38 PM

Currently in the lever action brush gun phase myself.
Rossi 92 in 357mag for fun and still hunting deer in thick woods.

Now wanting either a Rossi 16” 454casull for flexibility (45lc and 454 full power)
Or the go to 45/70 in a 18” length


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.